1. StarGazer

    StarGazer Member

    My tripod has a level bubble, it was not my intention to measure the curvature of the horizon that day, but the hidden of the lighthouse, so I didn't checked the bubble. I'll make sure to show you guys that the camera is levelled before I get back there.
     
  2. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    You were on the beach, so no curve would be visible. From that altitude above sea level the horizon is both very close, and essentially flat. And it's never tilting from one side of an image to the other - it only curves up in the middle. Hence your photos are not level.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Weirdly, zooming in and overlaying a grid appears to show that the lighthouse is pretty much bang on vertical. And rotating the image so that the horizon is horizontal in the frame puts the lighthouse at a noticeable slant.
     
  4. Clouds Givemethewillies

    Clouds Givemethewillies Active Member

    I blame the camera!
    Rotated 1 degree and stretched vertically x 40.
    No Zoom stecjhed 40x.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    No it doesn't.

    (Visual interpretation without pictures can be refuted without pictures)

    20171218-125731-e44vm. 20171218-125835-2yvpd.


    There's a slight lean illusion there due to the lighting. The left side is illuminated, so less visible.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Double weird. When I first looked it really appeared slanted; but I rechecked on my Slant Detector 5000 (TM) and it's not there now.

    Must be a bit o' that ol' Mandela Effect. ;)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. Clouds Givemethewillies

    Clouds Givemethewillies Active Member

    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Had another go at photographing the curve of the horizon today, with this setup from about 300 feet above sea level:

    unaltered.

    The results, to quote Professor Denzil Dexter, were disappointing:

    above centre.
    1. Above centre of frame

    slightly above centre.
    2. Very slightly above centre of frame

    below centre.
    3. Below centre of frame

    Disappointing, but some interesting distortions.
     
  9. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    What camera?
     
  10. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Moto E4 smartphone.
     
  11. DavidB66

    DavidB66 Member

    As has been mentioned in this thread and elsewhere, it is often said that from the normal cruising height of a commercial airliner - between 30,000 and 36,000 feet - the horizon is usually too obscure for its curvature to be definitely visible. I was therefore interested to see a 'flat earth' video which appears to get round this problem by using an infrared filter (as I think was also suggested somewhere in this thread). The video is here:

    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s6n7j-vC2s&t=566s
    In case the link is not valid, the uploader is JTolan Media1, and the title is "Infrared Horizon from 33,000 feet, Astounding Flat Earth Phenomena!"
    What is really astounding is that despite the claims of the uploader, and the chorus of adulation from his flat-earth subscribers, the infra-red footage actually shows pretty clear curvature throughout, except when the camera is zoomed in to a narrow field of view of the horizon. It is even very noticeable in the opening 'title' shot of the video. Of course, the curvature is small, but it looks consistent with what should be expected from a height of 11,000 meters in Walter Bislin's simulator. (It would be interesting for someone with the technical ability to overlay the two for comparison.)
    It is a puzzling psychological phenomenon when large numbers of people apparently literally cannot see evidence that conflicts with their beliefs. I can only surmise that they have grossly exaggerated ideas of the amount of curvature that (according to 'globers') they ought to see, so that when they do not see that exaggerated amount, they fail to observe the smaller amount of curvature that is actually there in front of their eyes.
     
  12. DavidB66

    DavidB66 Member

    I suggested that it would be interesting to overlay a shot of the horizon in JTolan's video with the expected curvature from Walter Bislin's simulator. I don't have the tech ability to do this, but out of interest I did the following.
    First I took a screencap from the video. Using the basic Windows picture viewer tools I inserted a green dot on the horizon at the left, then another one at the centre. (I used green because it seemed to give the best contrast.) These two dots determine a straight line. If the horizon were flat, the straight line would continue along the horizon. But in fact it rises above the horizon, because the horizon is curved. I inserted two green dots on the right, on the same straight line, which clearly rise above it.
    I then did the same with Walter Bislin's simulator, using a height of 10,000 meters and a field of view of 70 degrees. This gave a good match with the shot from the video.
    The two images are here, if this works (just noticed one of them shows some bookmarks. Fortunately nothing very incriminating, so I will leave them) :

    Screenshot (595)_LI. Screenshot (596)_LI.
     
  13. DavidB66

    DavidB66 Member

    I expressed the hope that someone would overlay the horizon in the video onto the predictions of Walter Bislin's curvature simulator for the same height, as I didn't have the ability to do that myself. My hope has been more than satisfied, because Walter Bislin himself has done it! In his page here the simulation for a viewing height of 33,000 feet (10,058 meters) and a field of view of 75 degrees is superimposed on the same shot from J Tolan's video: http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Curvature+App:+Simulation+of+Globe-Earth+and+Flat-Earth&state=-49-1Click--into--image--left--to--right--to--change--opacity!-210058.4-128.149668-10.44-10.05-51-9-9-8~0.0343-10-1262.00752-1~50.3796-634-1Infrared_Horizon_from_33000_ft.jpg-10.77257785-179-1Credit:--<a--href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s6n7j~vC2s">JTolan--Media1</a>-1#App

    The result is a near-perfect match.

    download (3). download (2).
    .
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2018
    • Like Like x 2
  14. DavidB66

    DavidB66 Member

    I came across this French video, which at first sight is one of the best general flat-earth-debunks I have seen. There are a lot of good things in it, but especially relevant to this thread are the last 5 minutes or so, where the narrator discusses the curve of the horizon, and uses the lateral compression method to reveal curvature in several photos. A lot of the video is self-explanatory from the graphics, without any knowledge of French. For those with a little French, it may help to slow the video down to .75 x normal speed. The auto-generated French subtitles may be also of some use, but are not to be trusted: at one point they show the narrator talking about zombies, when he is really talking about les ombres (shadows)!


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZdWRC57ems
     
  15. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Those could have been really nice. But without the straight edge, how can we be sure the curve isn't being caused by barrel distortion?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Leifer

    Leifer Senior Member

    I can often "see" the horizon while at 35k feet on a commercial flight....depends on the weather and clarity. Sometimes it's blurred or obscured by haze.

    I still like the simple method TWCobra mentioned in THIS POST.
    ......a partially-filled water bottle, held sideways, so it's water is "level".
    It does not match with the horizon...meaning, the earth curves down, relative to your leveled position.
    It's a simple test that anyone flying can do.
    In fact they hand-out the leveling tool to anyone.
    (water bottles) :p

    Bottle 3.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  17. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    You could also do it with one of the plastic cups. Just ask for no ice.

    However that’s the dip, not a visible curve. Of course it’s a consequence of the curve, but a. It OT for this thread
     
  18. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Wolfie6020 is a well-known flat earth debunker on YouTube and Qantas pilot. Here's a still from a video he posted flying at 46,000 feet:

    Screenshot (2).
    Source: www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DDwx18JT9Y

    It seems almost academic to apply the compression technique to something that shows the curve of the earth so clearly. But since there are some straight lines in there I figured, why not?

    wolfie window shot.

    I'd say that's pretty clear that the curve isn't being caused by the camera or the window.
     
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2018
  19. jarlrmai

    jarlrmai Member

    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 10, 2019
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    • Like Like x 2
  21. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Two and a half years and still no convincing shot of the curve of the horizon? :(

    I'm in a great spot to do it but I've never owned a good enough camera.
     
  22. cloudspotter

    cloudspotter Senior Member

    Isn't Critical Think's video a convincing shot of the curve? I don't see how you could look down opposite ends of a tube and see the horizon at both ends if it wasn't curved
     
  23. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Indeed. Lots of convincing proofs of the curve of the horizon - but what I mean is the ol' straight edge 'n' compression technique, which is kind of lovely. :)
     
  24. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    • Like Like x 1
  25. Z.W. Wolf

    Z.W. Wolf Senior Member

    Back in my day camera shops rented equipment. Do camera shops still do that?
     
  26. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    I posted a video on youtube briefly summarising how to take shots of the curvature of the horizon, and hopefully it will inspire some people to do this. A few responses, however, have shown that some don't think it's possible, given that the general understanding is that the horizon is 'flat'.

    As Mick and others have explained, that's true - and yet, there is also a curve. The simplest way I can think of to explain it is to imagine a tiny being hovering above a coin. The coin is a 'flat disk', yet the edge of the coin is curved, and can be photographed.

    4e coin.
    Compressing images from Google Earth provides theoretical support for this, as does Walter Bislin's round earth/flat earth simulator:

    upload_2019-1-19_10-42-21.

    This shows a flat earth horizon on the left and globe earth horizon on the right, for a viewer at an elevation of 656 feet with a field of view of 60°.

    Here's the vertically stretched flat earth horizon:

    bislins flat.
    And here's the one for the globe:

    bislins globe.

    Due to the resolution of the screenshot, it's not as smooth a curve as we would expect from a good quality shot of the actual horizon, but it's clearly there.
     
    Last edited: Jan 19, 2019
  27. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Took some photos today with two straight edges framed around the horizon. Elevation was about 575 feet above sea level. Here's a small selection:

    IMG_1968.
    IMG_1989.

    The curve matches both the simulated curve from Walter Bislin's website and the expected pixel difference between the centre of the curve and the edge (~4).
     
  28. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    This is the original of the first of those images, unaltered, if anybody wants to check it:

    IMG_1968.JPG