jomper
Inactive Member
How many times do you have to have it pointed out to you that FEMA identified steel from WTC 7 and tested it, including recommendations for further testing?I am suggesting that they didn't have the steel to check.
How many times do you have to have it explained to you that the scientific method involves looking at all the evidence, including, you know, the actual physical evidence, before coming up with a theory -- not the other way around?
I must've pointed this out to you at least five times in this thread and you still don't seem to get it. The very least I'd expect from you as a "debunker" at this point is an attempt to undermine the relevance of FEMA's study of the WTC 7 steel or an attempt to explain why NIST didn't mention it -- not just dull repetition of something you've been repeatedly disabused of.
I'm not sure what's more bizarre: your insistence that there was no steel from the building to test, or Mick's assertion that the complete collapse of a building was not sufficient reason to test it.
Last edited by a moderator: