I have no time for racist "Illuminati" type ideas whatsoever. While I had never heard of "chemtrails" until this site, Google convinced me that there was no need to learn any more about "them". I have never doubted we went to the moon, given the reflectors, although I am aware that ontologically there is no proof yet (but it will come in time, either way). My reply to 9-11er's, is (an ironic) "Americans are so arrogant, we smash three of their skyscrapers to the ground and bomb the Pentagon, and still claim they did it themselves".
I am, however, very concerned about the Boston bombing.
I stumbled into this since I follow Cryptome for professional reasons (and as my gossip rag, if you want to be the first to know who Colin was tapping while searching for WMDs, Gucifer's your hack).
Cryptome published many high resolution photographs of the crime scene.
4chan crowed sourced these, identifying many of the faces, leading to the arrest of two obvious characters. They were both released the next day, since independently Jeff Baumann identified the brothers...
There are now more pictures.
I have stared at these images on multiple high resolution monitors for many many nights over the last four months. I know the characters involved, what injuries they suffered, how they moved in the first few minutes, what they have said in the press, how their stories have evolved, etc. I am deeply disturbed, and if I had any way of explaining what is in front of my eyes, I would not be at this site.
I have been to all the debunking websites (lurking only), and to be honest, currently, they don't yet even know what the the real question is. This is happening in real-time. All the debunkers I have encountered so far have obviously not looked at the pictures. Some even admit to this! It takes a lot of work to do so. I have also read your threads, and you guys are also behind on this one. The questions being raised here are from you-tube type videos, the throwing of the towel/dust (I go for towel), the men in skullcaps, etc. Out there, the geeks are questioning at a far more subtle level.
I hope that I am mistaken and that you guys are able to explain this. I assume that this will be a pleasurable experience for you because this is where you hang. I will only be civil, I hope you will be too. I am also going to take it very slowly. I do not enjoy public Internet forums. I like to properly understand an argument and need time to work out a rebuttal or admit defeat. I have no problem being beaten in an argument, that's how science works.
I have to be honest and say that I have been (recently) influenced by http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/
. He has put in a lot of work and is a great writer. It is not a discussion forum. [And yes, he does have a moon series. I rather enjoyed reading and debunking it (but was the shell of the lander really so thin that the astronauts had to be careful not to bump holes into it and has NASA really lost all 123 boxes containing the plans, diagrams, communications, radar, etc, during the trips, sometime in the 70s they say). Whatever.]