Please restrict discussion in this thread to the general topic of the evidence (i.e. the actual exhibits presented in the trial).
If there's something in it that debunks something, or there's some new theory that arises from these exhibits, then start a new thread (or add to an existing thread on the topic), otherwise this one will just end up being a mess.
Also, not every claim needs debunking. Don't waste your time with every little silly claim of the kind "looks like this to me", unless it's getting traction. There's an endless stream of bunk, but most of it goes nowhere.