When I think about it, this photograph is emblematic of UFOlogy today:
It's a blurry, grainy, manipulated, zoomed in section of a much larger aerial photo taken 5-6 years ago. If one then squints at some of the various bits of boosted contrasting desert colors, one supposedly sees clear evidence of secret hangers. Not just random secret hangers, but hangers that prove Lazar was telling the truth. For those wanting to believe Lazar in the face of overwhelming evidence he's making stuff up, here's another small tidbit to hang one's belief on.
I find it fascinating that 30 years later, people like Corbel or this MUFON guy Venditelli, keep trying to validate Lazar's stories. And almost as fascinating, is the offering of dubious or vague evidence in support, while completely ignoring anything contradictory. Prior to this film, Lazar had 2-3 main bits of evidence supporting his claims:
- Knapp produced a telephone directory from Los Alamos National Lab, that included Lazar in the list of employees. He did work at the lab in the mid '80s.
- The journalist who wrote about Lazar's jet car, said he was a "physicist" at the lab, so he must have vetted that fact before publishing it.
- One physicist from the lab thought Lazar was a physicist because he looked and dressed like one.
Now we can add a photo of secret hangers that supposedly Lazar could not have known about, unless he actually went there. UFOlogists could say they have a pretty sturdy 3-4 legged stool now. But like so much of UFOlogy, it's all illusory.
Not only is the photo vague at best, it could have been checked against a vast amount of other data, including years of Google Earth. But no, it's just 1 vague photo.
The LANL phone directory with Lazar's name in it is real, but it also shows he worked for a contractor that supplied technicians, not physicists. IF Lazar was a physicist at the lab, he would not have been working for the contractor.
The article about his jet car was a puff piece. The idea that the journalist vetted Lazar's claims about being a physicist, is a 2nd hand claim from Corbel. It appears the journalist didn't vet anything Lazar was claiming, including the notion that an old '70s Honda Civic could attain 200+ MPH when boosted by the jet in it's trunk. Or Lazar's straight up false claim that the Gluhariff jet engine was far more efficient than any other design. Or the claims of how much thrust it created. None of it was vetted, including the claim of being a physicist.
Only one actual physicist from LANL even thought Lazar was a physicist, and he never confirmed it. He just felt Lazar looked like a physicist. This was likely due to Corbel's framing the question in a standard UFO false dichotomy. Corbel found one guy, that when he asked him was Lazar more like a physicist or a janitor, leaving out the idea that he was a technician.
Like so much of UFOlogy, when the evidence presented is examined, there's not much there, there. When counter arguments, like Lazar's non-existent school records, his various claims of involvement in prostitution, his bank bankruptcy, his failure to produce the E115 in his kitchen and others are brought up, they are ignored and supporters point back to the phone book, the jet car article and now some blurry dark areas on a photo.