Here is a link to the published physics article
http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf
In it it discusses the assumptions NIST made without any further explanations and the likelihood of these assumptions being true.
It concludes that a growing number of science based people are beginning to ask legitimate questions in how fire and gravity created three unparalleled events.
So this seems to go against the NIST explanation and seems to give deeper explanations than NIST ever did.
Is this a bunk article or have these group of published physicist found legitimate grievances with the NIST report and demonstrated such accordingly?
http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf
In it it discusses the assumptions NIST made without any further explanations and the likelihood of these assumptions being true.
It concludes that a growing number of science based people are beginning to ask legitimate questions in how fire and gravity created three unparalleled events.
So this seems to go against the NIST explanation and seems to give deeper explanations than NIST ever did.
Is this a bunk article or have these group of published physicist found legitimate grievances with the NIST report and demonstrated such accordingly?