New published physics article points out NIST limitations and need for new investigation.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Truthful

Banned
Banned
Here is a link to the published physics article

http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf


In it it discusses the assumptions NIST made without any further explanations and the likelihood of these assumptions being true.


It concludes that a growing number of science based people are beginning to ask legitimate questions in how fire and gravity created three unparalleled events.


So this seems to go against the NIST explanation and seems to give deeper explanations than NIST ever did.


Is this a bunk article or have these group of published physicist found legitimate grievances with the NIST report and demonstrated such accordingly?
 

SR1419

Senior Member.
Is this a bunk article or have these group of published physicist found legitimate grievances with the NIST report and demonstrated such accordingly?


This was already posted:

https://www.metabunk.org/scientific...e-to-controlled-demolition.t7895/#post-189957

There is nothing new here...although one of the authors, Tony Szamboti, has participated extensively here:

https://www.metabunk.org/members/tony-szamboti.2740/

you should really check out the 9/11 forum:

https://www.metabunk.org/9-11.f28/
 

Truthful

Banned
Banned
Well they bring up valid points like how fire and gravity can't account for the massive amount of pulverization that occurred within seconds. Gravity and fires aren't that strong ever!


Are you aware that according to the official story that 220 stories of mostly undamaged building constituents were pulverized into a dust pile that didn't raise over the lobby levels Within seconds ?
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
i'm locking this thread. i will delete it shortly. @Truthful i already sent you the link to where this article is being discussed. If you post this yet again i will put you in moderation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Cairenn The problem of open published journals Practical Debunking 3
Mick West The Physics of Explosions Tossing Girders - Overpressure and Impulse 9/11 0
Mick West Debunked: First object teleported to Earth's orbit [Quantum Communication] Science and Pseudoscience 11
V Flight 93 Crash Physics - Fragmented Plane Buried in the Ground 9/11 10
Mick West How Buckling Led to "Free Fall" acceleration for part of WTC7's Collapse. 9/11 127
Mick West Debunked: Clifford Carnicom's "Contrail Physics" Contrails and Chemtrails 22
JFDee NY Times: Article about Solar Radiation Management Contrails and Chemtrails 2
TEEJ Pentagon to launch task force to investigate UFO sightings - August 14, 2020 CNN Article UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 28
JFDee NY Times Article about YouTube CT Study General Discussion 2
Mick West YouTube adds Encyclopedia Britannica article on Contrails to "Chemtrail" Videos Contrails and Chemtrails 18
MikeG Debunked: Obamacare Article 54 (Satire FB Page) General Discussion 2
SR1419 NYT article: How the Internet Is Loosening Our Grip on the Truth Practical Debunking 23
Critical Thinker Psychology Today article: 'Reasoned Sense would be better than Common Sense' Practical Debunking 0
SamBST article: I Was A Professional 9/11 Truther (And I Gave It Up) 9/11 0
Mick West Debunked: Article: "Court Takes Child From Mother After She Mentions Chemtrails At School" Contrails and Chemtrails 92
MikeC Metabunk linked from Cracked.com article on "Truthers" Sandy Hook 2
deirdre Debunked: Newtown Bee removing article links related to Sandy Hook citizen investigations Sandy Hook 3
MikeC Rolls Royce article on researching new superalloys General Discussion 0
Tunnelvisionary Geoengineering would be 'irrational and irresponsible' - Article on New Scientist Contrails and Chemtrails 2
derrick06 Corny UFO Article General Discussion 46
Pete Tar Vox article on Debunking, avoiding The Backfire Effect Practical Debunking 0
Graham2001 Aulis article uses NASA documents to cast doubt on the reality of Apollo Conspiracy Theories 26
E** Claim: Forbes article proves Obama/government caught telling media to coverup ebola Conspiracy Theories 2
Tobes Article in The Telegraph claims James Foley beheading video staged Conspiracy Theories 108
Dan Wilson PopSci article claiming to debunk ten GMO myths Health and Quackery 10
Critical Thinker Gawker article: Why I Write About (and Debunk) the Chemtrail Conspiracy Theory Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Qualiall Claim of Weather manipulation in WaPo article Contrails and Chemtrails 16
Buildy Slate Article Goes After NaturalNews Health and Quackery 6
Critical Thinker Article in Psychology Today: The Art of Positive Skepticism Practical Debunking 0
Jay Reynolds Interesting Intelligent Article on Cloud Seeding/Weather Modification Contrails and Chemtrails 0
JRBids Article: There is no such thing as chemtrails only contrails Contrails and Chemtrails 1
AluminumTheory What Keeps Conspiracy Theories Alive (article) Conspiracy Theories 96
ThatGuy Article on the psychology of conspiracy theories (from NYTimes) Practical Debunking 2
Cairenn article on bullshit Practical Debunking 0
HappyMonday Epoch Times' - 'Nervous-System Damage From the Sky' article Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Related Articles



































Related Articles

Top