In this video, David Tulis claims that a Stanford/NASA study on atmospheric aerosols, stating that they reduce wind speeds and rainfall, is related to geoengineering:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/55333712/highlight/574597
http://nooganomics.com/2014/11/stanford-nasa-say-perpetual-sky-haze-slows-wind-cuts-rainfall/
At 0:38:
[bunk]The Stanford study says that... geoengineering... it doesn't say this, but it lets you to understand this... that geoengineering, especially when material is deposited in the atmosphere, changes the weather.[/bunk]
As he acknowledges (but ignores), the study doesn't say that at all, and does not mention geoengineering anywhere.
The report the video references is this, from December 2006: http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/january24/slowwind-012407.html
Tulis is trying to link this to "geoengineering", or "sky striping", as he seems to believe that this is the only place that aerosols can be coming from.
At 2.55:
[bunk]Aerosol accumulation - what is that? What is aerosol accumulation? Mount Pinatubo went off 20 years ago, right, in 1992, I think, in the Philippines. We don't have aerosols being pumped into the air that I know of - except, well...[/bunk]
At 5:14:
[bunk]What's really absent in this story is where do these particles come from? We're not told. And the fact that this is a mystery is just intriguing.[/bunk]
He then goes on to try to link it to metal particles - the usual suspects of aluminium, strontium and barium.
In fact, if you look at the full paper, rather than the press release that made the news, the types of aerosols we are talking about are identified:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/55333712/highlight/574597
http://nooganomics.com/2014/11/stanford-nasa-say-perpetual-sky-haze-slows-wind-cuts-rainfall/
At 0:38:
[bunk]The Stanford study says that... geoengineering... it doesn't say this, but it lets you to understand this... that geoengineering, especially when material is deposited in the atmosphere, changes the weather.[/bunk]
As he acknowledges (but ignores), the study doesn't say that at all, and does not mention geoengineering anywhere.
The report the video references is this, from December 2006: http://news.stanford.edu/news/2007/january24/slowwind-012407.html
Tulis is trying to link this to "geoengineering", or "sky striping", as he seems to believe that this is the only place that aerosols can be coming from.
At 2.55:
[bunk]Aerosol accumulation - what is that? What is aerosol accumulation? Mount Pinatubo went off 20 years ago, right, in 1992, I think, in the Philippines. We don't have aerosols being pumped into the air that I know of - except, well...[/bunk]
At 5:14:
[bunk]What's really absent in this story is where do these particles come from? We're not told. And the fact that this is a mystery is just intriguing.[/bunk]
He then goes on to try to link it to metal particles - the usual suspects of aluminium, strontium and barium.
In fact, if you look at the full paper, rather than the press release that made the news, the types of aerosols we are talking about are identified:
The model was first run for February and August
1999 with and without emission of anthropogenic aerosol
particle and precursor gases (AAPPG) in the SCAB domain.
Precursor gases removed included anthropogenic SOx, NOx,
NH3, and speciated organics gases, but not CO2, CH4,
N2O, or CFCs. Particle emissions removed included black
and organic carbon, sulfate, and nitrate.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2006GL027838/full
In other words, standard pollutants from burning fossil fuels. No mention whatsoever of geoengineering or metal "nanoparticles".