Let's debunk my (very simple) perpetuum mobile

nah I don't think so, but there is another idea

what if there was a device at the bottom which would change the shape of the "open ball" so it would become buoyant and similar device at the top that would change the shape back so it would sink again when filled with balls? If the ball was made of elastic material in theory it could be possible, the question is however how much energy that would use especially at the bottom with high water pressure.
 
so here comes the next idea

Energy3.JPG

forget small balls, there is just one elastic big ball with two valves, one at the top one at the bottom, it's made from material denser than water(on this picture the ball is full of air, without pumping it out) and at the top it's connected to upper pump via upper valve, the air is sucked out and it sinks, at the bottom it's connected to bottom valve and bottom pump, the air is pumped in so the ball goes up, the rectangle on the left side is kind of battery (or "median" pump) that stores the energy since when it's on the top and air gets sucked out of the ball it actually produces power which is stored in that battery and used at the bottom for pumping the air in (granted there would be some losses).

The rest is same like before (ball is connected to string which rotates the coil etc.).

Anybody gets this or it's overcomplicated?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
nah I don't think so, but there is another idea

what if there was a device at the bottom which would change the shape of the "open ball" so it would become buoyant and similar device at the top that would change the shape back so it would sink again when filled with balls? If the ball was made of elastic material in theory it could be possible, the question is however how much energy that would use especially at the bottom with high water pressure.

Essentially inflating with vacuum. Imagine a device that slides out like a telescope. It really a different way of moving energy around. At the bottom you are storing energy in the ball by making it bigger and less dense (although really what you are doing is displacing water). You then recover the energy as the ball rises by the motion of the ball. There's no win, and friction pretty much immediately takes away the energy.
 
I know but the coil could be made so it makes the energy both ways (with reverse mode or something like that), so you would have ball making energy going up and going down and at the top when it pushes the air out, so you have 3 ways of making energy and only one taking it up.
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
"Potential Energy"

A well-known concept. There IS "potential" out there, in the Universe. We just must learn how to 'tap into' it. (Besides the obvious, of course....).
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I know but the coil could be made so it makes the energy both ways (with reverse mode or something like that), so you would have ball making energy going up and going down and at the top when it pushes the air out, so you have 3 ways of making energy and only one taking it up.

But the "making" energy (turning the coil) is also "taking" energy. i.e. it is a retarding force on the ball.

You can do an infinite number of variants on this, but at some point you should try doing the math.
 

KAT

Active Member
oh there is the flaw :D now if only it could be possible to kick the small balls out at the bottom without water entering in, but I doubt water pressure would allow it

Why does it have to be small balls in and out? Make the big one closed so it floats. Don't go opening it, ever, as that makes it fill up with water and sink. Just throw a net over it that has weights on. that would make it sink. Then remove the net and it will float up again. This is also easier than having to shovel up loose ones each time. The net dropping and removing can be done by the right arrangement of strings, associated with the outside one.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Why does it have to be small balls in and out? Make the big one closed so it floats. Don't go opening it, ever, as that makes it fill up with water and sink. Just throw a net over it that has weights on. that would make it sink. Then remove the net and it will float up again. This is also easier than having to shovel up loose ones each time. The net dropping and removing can be done by the right arrangement of strings, associated with the outside one.

But you can only do that once, as then the net will be at the bottom.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Is there a material that could sit halfway in the water column, react to the heat of the sun and rise during the day, then sink at night?
Any practical use to that motion, and would that technically be perpetual motion?
 

Jason

Senior Member
Is there a material that could sit halfway in the water column, react to the heat of the sun and rise during the day, then sink at night?
Any practical use to that motion, and would that technically be perpetual motion?
But then you would be dealing with evaporation, wouldn't you..
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Is there a material that could sit halfway in the water column, react to the heat of the sun and rise during the day, then sink at night?
Any practical use to that motion, and would that technically be perpetual motion?

No, it would be very inefficient solar power.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
S Help to debunk: 737 flies backward Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 61
Edward Current Does the beginning part of Gimbal debunk the claim that the object rotates? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 18
Daves! What tools are there to debunk pictures Practical Debunking 24
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
chrono117 How to Debunk Flat Earth Without Relying on NASA or Photos Flat Earth 42
Rory Explained: How Mount Rainier helps demonstrate the shape of the globe Flat Earth 38
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
George Tasker Using pin hole lenses to debunk CGI Rebuttals of Photos of Earth Curvature Flat Earth 7
Tom Binney Does my FE Debunk in this case make sense to you guys? Practical Debunking 23
derwoodii My eyes deceived me so I had to debunk myself Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 8
N How can I debunk the orbs in this photo? UFOs and Aliens 22
HoaxEye How to calculate the visible fraction of the Earth [e.g. 1972 Blue Marble, Apollo 17] Flat Earth 29
N Please help me to debunk this topic: stranges sphere outside of the ISS. General Discussion 18
Mick West Fireproof Cabbage, Burning Snow, Flat Earth - Are Some Things too Silly to Debunk? Practical Debunking 7
Mick West Burying the Debunk: How Fake News about "Pyramids" in Antarctica Creates False Balance Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 2
TWCobra Flat earth Debunk-change in apparent altitude of clouds as seen from airliner Flat Earth 2
Mick West An Easy Experiment to Debunk the Flat Earth by Observing the Size of the Sun Flat Earth 55
passionfly1 Lets finally debunk Nico and Marco Kaschuba (video hoaxers) People Debunked 0
Svartbjørn The Solar System.. To Scale (just for fun, nothing to debunk here) General Discussion 0
Mick West What to do about the Flat Earthers? Debunk, or ignore? Flat Earth 238
Critical Thinker Why we debunk and who do we reach. Practical Debunking 2
C MH370: Help me debunk this General Discussion 21
TemplarJLS Can someone debunk this George Washington quote? Quotes Debunked 6
TemplarJLS Some depopulation quotes to debunk? Quotes Debunked 16
Henk001 High altitude clouds don't have a cooling effect Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Mike Fl Can someone debunk this? Sandy Hook Shooting 100% Fraud Proof in 2 mins. - Photo Time Analysis Sandy Hook 21
M Debunk: The horizon never falling as proof of flat Earth theory Flat Earth 29
WeedWhacker Let's imagine the actual area of the sky, above.... Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Dan Wilson PopSci article claiming to debunk ten GMO myths Health and Quackery 10
Vindog Debunk this [Planes at different altitude and different contrails over France] Contrails and Chemtrails 43
Critical Thinker Gawker article: Why I Write About (and Debunk) the Chemtrail Conspiracy Theory Contrails and Chemtrails 0
W Debunk NASA is proposing spraying stratospheric aerosols. Contrails and Chemtrails 9
T Debunk: Chemtrails leave no space between aircraft and the beginning of the trail. Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Jeffrey Orling Is there anything about 9/11 left to debunk 9/11 46
C Help debunk please!? [Contrail Grids, Weather Modification, Fuel Dumping] Contrails and Chemtrails 18
George B Debunk: Kinder gentler Debunking is better. . . ?? Practical Debunking 38
Noblelox Practical bunk used to debunk Boston Marathon Bombings 18
Alchemist Please Debunk: The Drills (conflicting info from 2 reputable sources) Boston Marathon Bombings 13
Alchemist Debunk This New JFK Information Conspiracy Theories 101
David Fraser Should we debunk "hoax" tragedies with "crisis actors"? Practical Debunking 21
DebunkingShills Orbs: Something the metaJUNK shills just can't debunk. Contrails and Chemtrails 24
Joe Newman There will be widescale rioting after Zimmerman verdict. Debunk, please Conspiracy Theories 256
Mick West Using Campaign Finance Reform to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Practical Debunking 25
Z please someone debunk this crap Contrails and Chemtrails 15
BlindIdiots Please Debunk WeatherWar101s "Weather War Big Picture" Video Contrails and Chemtrails 5
Soulfly DOJ investigation of the AP debunk the government controlling the media? General Discussion 0
Oxymoron Easy WTC 7 Video to Debunk 9/11 2
sgirl Col. Richard French of the USAF States his Job was to Debunk UFOs - Citizen Hearing Conspiracy Theories 6
N Little help to debunk clouds with color Practical Debunking 2
Rroval Debunk: imgur: "Boston Truth Revealed" Boston Marathon Bombings 84
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top