JMartJr
Senior Member.
Yes, in any individual case. The weakness in the "you can't expect good pictures because people are surprised and need a moment to recover, think of their camera and pull it out" argument is that it has to work EVERY TIME.So for fleeting scenarios, I'd agree that not actively thinking of capturing a photo/video could be understandable.
A similar argument could be made for fireball meteors, plane crashes, homicides, etc. And while often such things happen with nobody taking a picture or video, SOMETIMES people react quickly, or have their camera out anyway, and we have examples of clear, definitive pictures/film/video of all of them.
The argument has been made, "Go out and take a video of the next low flying plane you see, you'll see how tricky it is" misses the point that however tricky it might be to grab a shot of a given unexpected plane buzzing you, we have LOTS of imagry of low flying planes -- that is clear, crisp, retailed and very obvious the sort of thing captured in the picture/video.
Numerous example here: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/rare-things-that-have-been-documented-much-better-than-ufos.13047/