Event 201

Eleora

New Member
There is a conspiracy theory out there that Event 201 is a prediction of the covid19 outbreak. Here is a link to Event 201 https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/
2020-04-20 (10).png 2020-04-20 (13).png

The conspiracy theory goes like this, when the Elite do something it's their code of conduct to also tell people what they are doing hence why Event 201 was made. Their plan is take away freedom of speech and to use the virus outbreak as a means of implementing new laws that will enable them to eventually accomplish their New World Order as this video states, the video also pulls up a website @ 12:35 minutes in to 13:50 minutes in I do not understand that part could someone please elaborate? And provide some tools for a better understanding of it and how to debunk it.

2020-04-20 (8).png2020-04-20 (9).png

How can this entire theory be debunked. And what type of tools and verbiage could a person use to debunk it with those who believe it?
 
Last edited:

Mendel

Senior Member.
There is a conspiracy theory out there that Event 201 is a prediction of the covid19 outbreak. Here is a link to Event 201 https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/
From the website:
Basically, governments and institutions all over the world have been prudent and used past pandemics as impetus to plan for the next one: after SARS, MERS, Ebola, Swine Flu, it was kind of inevitable that a new epidemic would come along, and the potential for it to be not contained and develop into a pandemic was already apparent. It would be foolish to not plan a response to these challenges (and more foolish to not heed these plans once the pandemic had reared its head, but I digress).

These plans and planning events for a predictable future are now produced as "proof" of a "prediction", when all they are is evidence of people in responsible positions employing forethought.
These claims all insinuate that "planning an epidemic response" and "planning an epidemic" are the same thing, and that preparing for an outbreak and predicting an outbreak are the same thing.
As an analogy, does keeping a standing army mean you know what the next war is going to be, and when? Do the military exercises we do in peace time indicate what kind of war we want? No, they indicate what kind of conflict we think is going to be likely, and if we were smart, our guess was somewhat close to the actual future. That's natural and desired, but it isn't proof that we planned a war. It just means we planned for a war.

We did not plan an epidemic, we planned for an epidemic. Because it's the smart thing to do.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
How can this entire theory be debunked.
Their plan is take away freedom of speech and to use the virus outbreak as a means of implementing new laws that will enable them to eventually accomplish their New World Order

The theory can't be debunked. Event 201 can be explained (as Mendel just did) and you can present multi examples of other exercises from previous years after Sars 2002 that would show that "yes, it is a coincidence this exercise on October 18, 2019 was a few weeks before the Covid pandemic".

i dont want to watch the whole video
but basically his claim in your youtube video is that "this is a wild coincidence"





the video also pulls up a website @ 12:35 minutes in to 13:50 minutes in I do not understand that part could someone please elaborate?
the clip shows a patent owned by the CDC (United States health agency) for isolated SARS-COV (the 2002 SARS outbreak) virus from humans.

SARS-COV is not Covid-19. SARS (2002) was a scary outbreak you can learn about on Wikipedia or by googling about it.

Your clip says
which is just total bunk. first noone releases a virus. second he provides no proof anyone released the virus.

The youtuber also seems to think it is a new virus. it's not it is the SARS-COV virus (2002).

the tools you need are google. Google "patent [then name of patent]" and you get the patent you can read
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220852B1/en

(btw, filed DURING the SARS 2002-2003 outbreak)
1587388062689.png

 
Last edited:

Eleora

New Member
I received a message that I must edit this post as it breaks community guidelines, I am trying to figure out a way to that now.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
I received a message that I must edit this post as it breaks community guidelines, I am trying to figure out a way to that now.
you can speak to the moderator, if you have questions, by responding to the message in your Metabunk Inbox
1587395745251.png
 

Mendel

Senior Member.
I received a message that I must edit this post as it breaks community guidelines, I am trying to figure out a way to that now.
It's a good exercise: thinking about "what exactly is the claim" and "what exactly is the evidence they claim to have" are among the first questions you need to answer when you want to deal with something like that on your own!
 

Eleora

New Member
Yes I honestly find it hard at times to even figure out what is being said and to put into words. Its something I need to work on. My head is mush right now so much stuff being thrown at me and it takes a lot of time to answer and debunk these things. Wish I could do it like you guys.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Yes I honestly find it hard at times to even figure out what is being said and to put into words. Its something I need to work on. My head is mush right now so much stuff being thrown at me and it takes a lot of time to answer and debunk these things. Wish I could do it like you guys.
Metabunk is good training. you just have to practice. I'm still a bit scatter brained, but I was much more scatter brained before i started on Metabunk.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
It's a good exercise: thinking about "what exactly is the claim" and "what exactly is the evidence they claim to have" are among the first questions you need to answer when you want to deal with something like that on your own!

and the topic. even coming up with a proper title (from the transcribed claim) helps you focus on the actual claim. like "event 201" tells us nothing. or "fauchi jama article".

if the title is "Claim: Bill Gates funded Event 201 pandemic simulation exercise a NWO power grab" or whatever the claim is … (why they would publicize it if it was malicious, I don't know)
 
Top