Typical example:
http://www.truthandaction.org/houston-eliminates-gender-based-restrooms/
[bunk]
It's now legal for men to use women's bathrooms, showers, and dressing facilities – and vice-versa – thanks to the passing of the Equal Rights Ordinance in Houston, TX last Wednesday night.
Mayor Parker, Houston's first openly gay mayor, called it "most personally meaningful thing I will ever do as mayor."
...
Careful next time you venture into a restroom in Houston, you and your kids might get an eyeful of something you didn't expect.
[/bunk]This is bunk for two reasons.
Firstly, the bathroom clause was removed from the bill weeks before it passed:
http://www.msnbc.com/craig-melvin/houston-passes-equal-rights-ordinance
It's a poorly worded clause, and has potential problems (what about people of indeterminate gender expression, or people who are simply not passing very well?). But the intent is clear - if a person looks and acts like a woman, then they should be able to use the women's restroom, and if a person looks and acts like a man, then they should be able to use the men's restroom
For example this person, formerly male.
Or this person, formerly female:
http://www.truthandaction.org/houston-eliminates-gender-based-restrooms/
[bunk]
It's now legal for men to use women's bathrooms, showers, and dressing facilities – and vice-versa – thanks to the passing of the Equal Rights Ordinance in Houston, TX last Wednesday night.
Mayor Parker, Houston's first openly gay mayor, called it "most personally meaningful thing I will ever do as mayor."
...
Careful next time you venture into a restroom in Houston, you and your kids might get an eyeful of something you didn't expect.
[/bunk]This is bunk for two reasons.
Firstly, the bathroom clause was removed from the bill weeks before it passed:
http://www.msnbc.com/craig-melvin/houston-passes-equal-rights-ordinance
Secondly, the clause never eliminated gender based restrooms. The actual clause was:External Quote:A final vote was pushed back earlier this month after critics raised issues with what's been dubbed "the bathroom clause." Parents and others expressed concerns that transgender people would be allowed to use public restrooms of the gender in which they identify themselves. The clause was ultimately removed, but transgender people can still file a discrimination complaint under the process outlined for all protected classes.
Note the clause specifically expects that restrooms are usually gender specific, and are designated as such. No changes are requested there. The law simply says that people who express a particular gender identity be allowed to used the appropriate restroom. It also says if they don't look like they are of that gender, then the business owner can deny them entry to the restroom.External Quote:
b) It shall be unlawful for any place of public accommodation or any employee or agent thereof to intentionally deny any person entry to any restroom, shower room, or similar facility if that facility is consistent with and appropriate to that person's expression of gender identity. It shall be a defense to prosecution for discrimination on the basis of gender identity under this article, however, if the defendant had a good faith belief that the gender or gender identity of the person discriminated against was not consistent with the gender designation of the facility. For purposes of this section, a defendant has a good faith belief if the manner in which the person represented or expressed gender to others (e.g. behavior, clothing, hairstyles, activities, voice or mannerisms) is not consistent with the gender designation of the facility the person attempted to access. Nothing in this section shall require construction of a new bathroom, shower room, or similar facility.
It's a poorly worded clause, and has potential problems (what about people of indeterminate gender expression, or people who are simply not passing very well?). But the intent is clear - if a person looks and acts like a woman, then they should be able to use the women's restroom, and if a person looks and acts like a man, then they should be able to use the men's restroom
For example this person, formerly male.
Or this person, formerly female:
Attachments
Last edited: