Debunked: Chemtrail "Chembows" [Solar Halos]

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
A recent post on The Ann Arbor News Facebook Page displayed a photo of a solar halo with some other clouds and some aircraft contrails

They included a short explanation of what it was:
Unfortunately the comments below the photo were quickly overrun by believers in the "chemtrail" theory (and then by other people trying to explain things to them). A few samples:
There's two equally important things you need to know about this story:

1) Atmospheric Optical Phenomena such as Halos, Sun-Dogs, "Fire Rainbows", and iridescent clouds" have been seen for thousands of years, and recorded and understood for over a hundred years
2) They can only be made by clouds of ice water.

The Science and History of Halos, etc.

Haloes have been observed since ancient times. Here's a 17th Century painting of some haloes.


And here's a 1957 book showing a halo with some contrails contributing to it:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/metabunk/sets/72157642384424663/

Halos are formed by the refraction of sunlight through billions of tiny ice crystals in the air.

The colors in the halo occur because of refraction. This the bending of light as it goes through a prism. Different wavelengths (colors) of light are bent
different amounts, and this produces the spectrum of colors. We've all see this with the classic triangular prism splitting light.

A hexagonal ice crystal is doing basically the same thing, as it's like a triangular prism with the corners cut off.


The most common form of Halo is the 22° halo, which is the one in the top photo. It's called a 22° halo because of the angle between the sun and the inner edge of the halo. This angle comes about in part because of the angle of the faces in the ice crystals.


http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/circ2.htm

Why it can only be water

There are several primary reasons why only water can make these halos.
1) Hexagonal transparent crystals
2) Refractive Index
3) Quantity Required
4) Temporary nature

1) Hexagonal transparent crystals
The 22° Halo requires transparent faces which are at 60° to each other. You can only get this with a triangular or hexagonal crystal structure. Water forms hexagonal shapes naturally. No chemicals form triangular crystals. So we can eliminate any crystal substance that does not have a natural sixfold symmetry, such as common table salt crystals:


We can also eliminate any finely milled substance, which would produce irregular shapes with rough surfaces incapable of refracting light. Here, for example, is a fine dust (nano scale on the right) of Aluminum Oxide:

And here's a more typical milled alumina dust:


We can also eliminate commercially manufactured Alumina power, the purest form of which is known as mono-crystalline aluminum oxide, and looks like:

Or nano sized:

Irregular colored crystal will not make a halo.

We can also eliminate most naturally occurring minerals, as they generally contain impurities that make the crystal either opaque, or they will color or scatter the light, or both.

The crystals would have to be grown on site from a near 100% pure vapor - which of course is trivial to do with water - as it's the natural process of ice cloud (or ice fog) formation. But a lot harder to do with an artificial substance - especially hard to do with aluminum oxide, with a melting point of 3,762°F (2,072°C). And even then, while aluminum oxide does have some hexagonal geometry from some angles, it does not tend to grow into hexagonal shapes.

2) Refractive Index

Ice has a refractive index of of 1.31. Pure Aluminum Oxide crystals (Al2O3, Corundum) has a refractive index of 1.76. The refractive index governs the angle, and so Aluminum Oxide could not make a 22° Halo, because it would refract light at the wrong angle.

http://www.micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/prismsandbeamsplitters/equilateralprism/


So if the halo is standard sized, then it's either water, or something with the same refractive index as (frozen) water.

3) Quantity Required

Clouds weigh quite a lot, even though they are not very dense, they are very big. Halos essentially form in a fog of cirrus. Cirrus clouds have about 0.03 g/m3 (grams per cubic meter) of water in them. Let's call that 0.01 for a fine ice haze. Now a 22 degree halo extends out a bit from the 22 degree, say 30 degrees. It' generally some around 12 km up, and the sun around 45 degree. This gives an actual circle of ice fog (12*tan(30)) = 7 km radius (being very rough with the geometry here). A thin layer of cloud would be 100m. So that 3.14*7000*7000*100 = 15386000000 cubic meters of ice fog. Multiply that by 0.03 gives 461580000g, or 461 metric tons.

And that's just if we've somehow just managed to weave the crystals into a small thin patch of sky directly in front of the sun. In the more normal case, the sky is covered with cirrus haze (say 50 km in each direction, which has a thickness of 1km or more. The amount of crystal needed to create such an cirrus overcast is over 200,000 metric tons. This is simply not possible to do with something like aluminum oxide.

So how is it possible with contrails? A typical plane creates 100-300 metric tons of water from the fuel. Yet an full sky overcast can occur with just a handful of planes. Where is the extra water coming from? The answer is it comes from the atmosphere. The air is at 70% relative humidity, meaning it's already holding millions of tons of water. The addition of the small amount of water from the engine pushes the relative humidity briefly over 100%, allowing the water to condense out in tiny drops, which then freeze. The ice crystals continue to grow from the atmospheric water, adding up to 1,000x their original weight.

That's simply impossible to duplicate by spraying a crystal powder. all you have is the original crystal, and that's nowhere near enough to cover the sky. A handful of planes would end up 1/1000th the optical density of the equivalent contrail-induced cirrus.

4) Temporary nature

Let's say you did somehow manage to loft up 200,000 metric tons of nano-manufactured perfect aluminum-oxide crystals, and ignoring the problems with geometry, and refractive index. Then the next problem is the temporary nature of solar halos. Sometimes they just last for a few minutes or hours. They are there one day, and almost always gone the next, and usually gone much sooner. Where does the overcast go?

The obvious answer with a cirrus haze is that it evaporates (technically it "sublimes", turning from solid back to water vapour). It does this quite naturally as the air heats up, or as the ice crystals grow large enough to slowly sink into slightly warmer air. It basically just fades away.

But if some other substance were being sprayed, then where does it go? How can it vanish in a few hours? Of course it can't. Water can vanish because it's basically being re-absorbed back into the atmosphere as water vapor. But a powder of aluminum oxide isn't going to vanish. It's just going to stay there, for many days, until it slowly sinks to the earth. But that's not what we see. So it must be water.
 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I downloaded HaloSim, but have not found how to change the refractive index.

I did come across this interesting "ice analog" which could in theory be sprayed out of planes to make a 22° halo:

http://www.herts.ac.uk/research/str...SRP/ice-scattering/ice-analogue-image-gallery
The discussion there emphasises just how unique the Hexagonal + 1.31 RI is.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I took this photo at Mammoth Mountain, California, Feb 18, 2008.



Occasionally a halo is accompanies by a Corona, which I also observed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_(optical_phenomenon)
The one I saw at Mammoth was rather atypical.

Seriously though, since a corona is a diffraction phenomena (i.e. caused by lots of small particles that scatter light of particular wavelengths) then if something were being sprayed in the sky it would create a corona, not a 22° halo (which requires refraction, and hence transparent crystals).

Because they are usually washed out by the strong light of the sun, Corona's are more frequently visible around the moon, in a layer of clouds. We've all seen something like this:


Solar coronas are more dramatic under more marginal and extreme conditions such as in antarctica, where the clean air scatters the sun less in general which isolates the optical effect of the corona:
http://ajpadilla.wordpress.com/2013/01/29/2013-a-fresh-start/

The diameter and spread of a corona depends on the size and size variation of the particles, so you can infer some things about the particles from the nature of the corona. Coronea can even be formed from pollen:

http://www.mysanantonio.com/life/li...-pollen-corona-spectacular-sights-4206774.php

[Note: the term "corona" is more frequently used for the "ring of fire" directly visible around the sun during a solar eclipse, or with a solar telescope]
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Particle size is an important consideration for contrails, clouds, halos, and coronas. If a particle is too small, then diffraction phenomena outweigh refraction phenomena. If it's really small, then it will only be affecting light by Rayleigh scattering, and it's practically invisible:

http://www.google.com/patents/US3517505
0.5 microns is 500 nm. So for a corona or halo to be visible, the particles have to be bigger than that - i.e. out of the nano range.
 

SR1419

Senior Member.
A recent post on The Ann Arbor News Facebook Page displayed a photo of a solar halo with some other clouds and some aircraft contrails

They included a short explanation of what it was:

Unfortunately the comments below the photo were quickly overrun by believers in the "chemtrail" theory (and then by other people trying to explain things to them). A few samples:


Did they (AANews) mislabel it as a sundog? Isnt it just a halo?

http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/parhelia.htm
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
Unfortunately the comments below the photo were quickly overrun by believers in the "chemtrail" theory...

This makes me sad...my "heart" hurts, and my eyes leak water...I think they are called "tears". (not "tears"...I didn't tear anything, I teared up...uh oh, this English language in print is fraught with impossibility and misinterpretation, sometimes...).

In espanol a "tear" is lagrima. The verb to "tear" is romper.

 
Last edited:

BigTBoom

New Member
Summertime halos are not uncommon either. The Monthly Weather Review would print a list of halo observations every month and there were frequent observations across the country during June/July/August...From Texas to the Dakotas, California to Maine.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Summertime halos are not uncommon either. The Monthly Weather Review would print a list of halo observations every month and there were frequent observations across the country during June/July/August...From Texas to the Dakotas, California to Maine.

Thanks for the pointer. See this article, from exactly 100 years ago:
https://www.metabunk.org/sk/mwr-042-07-0436.pdf



Says that in Paris, France, a 22° halo (or at least fragments thereof) is visible 130 days of the year (35%, or roughly one day out of three).

And here:

https://www.metabunk.org/sk/mwr-046-07-0309c.pdf
Halos observed in July 1918
 
J

Joe

Guest
Iv have seen quite a few over the past few years and all of the time it was because of persistent contrails .Probably more than 50. Have yet to see one without contrails present .
 

solrey

Senior Member.
Iv have seen quite a few over the past few years and all of the time it was because of persistent contrails .Probably more than 50. Have yet to see one without contrails present .

Because the conditions that produce the ice crystals (cirrus clouds) which make the halos are also conducive to contrail formation within the same air mass.
 
Here's a halo from reflective glass beads applied to road paint. I guess that counts as a chembow. The halo is more prominent closer to application day.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140711_150202_040.jpg
    IMG_20140711_150202_040.jpg
    149.3 KB · Views: 217

Ammon Wade

New Member
So the glass beads are crystals too? I would like to see some electron microscope of those little things. I can imagine now I need to see what kind of halo I produce if I spray a mist of "Penta Water" towards the sun? The perfect experiment for a bunk-hunting website! :D
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
I would like to see some electron microscope of those little things.

Yeah, fascinating to me as well, but do not expect that some adherents will be 'convinced' by the science. Meaning, what one cannot hold in one's hand and then contemplate and understand? It is increasingly difficult to explain to someone who hasn't had a FULL level of all the required scientific training.

ETA: As a layperson trying to understand fields of science that I do NOT have expertise in, I nevertheless can grasp at LEAST the basics. Some people cannot.
 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Here's a halo from reflective glass beads applied to road paint. I guess that counts as a chembow. The halo is more prominent closer to application day.
"Beads" implies spheres, so it sound more like a rainbow type optical effect than a halo.

Rainbows are created by total internal reflection in tiny drops (spheres) of water in rain or clouds (or garden sprinklers)
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
So the glass beads are crystals too? I would like to see some electron microscope of those little things. I can imagine now I need to see what kind of halo I produce if I spray a mist of "Penta Water" towards the sun? The perfect experiment for a bunk-hunting website! :D
You'd have to spray it away from the sun, unless you were somewhere very cold.
 

derwoodii

Senior Member.
some info from http://www.atoptics.co.uk/droplets/glorair.htm and from http://spaceweather.com/

about this heart shaped halo or called a Glory

glory_strip.jpg
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
some info from http://www.atoptics.co.uk/droplets/glorair.htm and from http://spaceweather.com/

about this heart shaped halo or called a Glory

View attachment 8023

Nice. Here I've increased the color contrast, and added an indicator of the perspective of the underlying clouds to make it more clear how the shape formed:
 

SystemX

New Member
I've seen halos/coronas around the sun/moon countless times over the years and it has always seemed natural to me, but this rainbow caught my attention as I've never seen anything like this before. I took this photo a few weeks ago in Los Angeles. Any info much appreciated and thanks in advance.Rainbow Cloud.JPG
 

Trailspotter

Senior Member.
I've seen halos/coronas around the sun/moon countless times over the years and it has always seemed natural to me, but this rainbow caught my attention as I've never seen anything like this before. I took this photo a few weeks ago in Los Angeles. Any info much appreciated and thanks in advance.View attachment 15170

Probably, this is (a part of) the circumhorizontal arc (a.k.a., circumhorizon arc).
 
Last edited:

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
Can you show how these can be confirmed online or microfiche? The reason why I ask is that so often the believers will try to assert these records are made up.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Can you show how these can be confirmed online or microfiche? The reason why I ask is that so often the believers will try to assert these records are made up.
Well, I have a paid subscription to the Gale database which includes The Times.There's no free online access. But public libraries ought to have them on microfiche.

Those are all from the letters page, and all from August 1944. I don't think I made a note of the publication dates (I took those screenshots some time ago when I posted them in the pre-1995 contrails thread) but they'd probably be within two or three days of the dates of each letter. They'd be easy to find in a library.


Edit: info on the Times Digital Archive here: http://gale.cengage.co.uk/times-digital-archive/times-digital-archive-17852006.aspx

I imagine quite a few big city or university libraries in the USA would have a subscription.
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Incidentally, a little biographical snippet... I've just been doing a bit of digging and I'm pretty certain that the U. V. Bogaerde who wrote that first letter is one Ulric Van den Bogaerde, the father of Derek Van den Bogaerde — better known as Dirk Bogarde!

The family had a home in Clayton, Sussex, and there can't have been too many U. V. Bogaerdes in England in the 1940s, certainly not in a small Sussex village.

image.jpeg
 
Last edited:

cloudspotter

Senior Member.
DIY experiments to recreate optical phenomena at home

Capture.JPG

https://photonicsdesign.jimdo.com/experiments/
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
MikeG Debunked: Air Force Verifies Chemtrails are Real Contrails and Chemtrails 6
MikeG Debunked: Geoengineering Killing Great Barrier Reef Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Mick West Debunked: Rise In Respiratory Mortality from 4th to 3rd Cause of Death. "Chemtrail Flu" General Discussion 13
Mick West Debunked: Kylie Jenner's Chemtrail Meme Tweet Contrails and Chemtrails 54
Trailblazer Debunked: "The Snake" non-commercial chemtrail plane (China Eastern A330) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 33
Gundersen Debunked: Australian Rainwater "Chemtrail" test Contrails and Chemtrails 11
Mick West Debunked: Chemtrail "Laser Line" and 4 UFOs Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Gundersen Debunked: Airline Passengers Told To Lower Shades During Chemtrail Spraying Contrails and Chemtrails 25
Willie Debunked: Chemtrail instrument panel Contrails and Chemtrails 4
mrfintoil Debunked: SKYSCRATCH - The Geoengineering/Chemtrail Cover Up Contrails and Chemtrails 0
TWCobra Debunked: Damien Collins "theDamo63" QF 63 Chemtrail video 21 May 2014 Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Mick West Debunked: German Aeronautics Engineer "I Installed Chemtrail Devices" Whistleblower Contrails and Chemtrails 45
Mick West Debunked: Monsanto Patents and Chemtrails (Infowars' GMO-Chemtrail Connection) Contrails and Chemtrails 20
deirdre Debunked: Look-up.org.uk's Chemtrail "Missing Link" [hybrid contrails] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 16
TWCobra Max Bliss debunked-Aircraft engine oil systems used to dispense Chemtrail chemicals Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Mick West Debunked: Unmarked "Chemtrail Sprayer" over San Francisco [Marked A380] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
Mick West Debunked: US Reported In Panic After Chemtrail Planes Forced Down In India and Nigeria Contrails and Chemtrails 1
TWCobra Wigington/Max Bliss Debunked. Automated Chemtrail dispersal Commercial aircraft Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Mick West Debunked: Monsanto and USAF School of Aerospace Medicine chemtrail study 1977 Contrails and Chemtrails 22
Mick West Debunked: Chemtrail Plane and Other Unlabeled Photos from Facebook etc. Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 227
Jay Reynolds Debunked: Iain Carstairs' Chemtrail Conspiracy Theories Contrails and Chemtrails 133
jvnk08 Debunked: Video: Two chemtrail tankers almost collide with fedex jet? Contrails and Chemtrails 34
HappyMonday Debunked: Chemtrail Health Alert Network notice for Arizona Contrails and Chemtrails 11
Mick West Debunked: Chemtrail Plane Interior (Ballast Barrels) Contrails and Chemtrails 319
Mick West Debunked: Amazing Footage of WWII Chemtrail Experiments Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Mick West Debunked: Chemtrail Spray Operations Captured on Doppler Radar Contrails and Chemtrails 10
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 35
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: "Nancy Pelosi's long time Chief of Staff is a key executive at Dominion Voting" Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: Wisconsin Turnout 89% Impossible High [Actually 72%] Election 2020 1
Mick West Debunked: Video of Poll Worker "Filling In" Ballots. Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top