owntheissue
Member
But still, we're back to the same issue. He held this position for maybe 2 years:
So, like running AFRL, he may have known all the secrets, but so did a lot of people, including his predecessor and his replacement. What sets him apart from all the rest, is the DeLong emails and suggested ties to Duggin, bringing UFOs into the discussion.
You're probably aware of the types of tech. being name checked by credible sources around this time.
Nothing to do with UFO's (or ET, anti gravity or recoveries etc). but a few things that would be essential ingredients for wider game changing technology that might look like they came from Mellon's legally ambiguous "NHI"'s.
If anything had come of the CRADA, which had no monetary gain for TTSA, it would have shown TTSA was trafficking in stolen government assets. Like AAWSAP being the result of Bigelow knowing Reid, I suspect Elizondo had an old Army buddy that helped facilitate the CRADA for this piece of junk.
Again back to the point on legal grey areas.
TTSA sent CIA co-intel specialist Lue on a documented mission to retrieve the "junk" and this was then presented as "NHI in origin".
No idea where to start on the legality of this as presented by TTSA.
Would likely end up in some sort of maritime law based finders keeps argument.
I'm not sure what "terrestrial know how" from Justice you're referring to, but the CRADA involved one of Art's Parts
The bit where Justice (LM Skunkworks Advanced Systems VP/holder of 5 classified patents) implied we could (only using curent tech.) use an atomic deposition method to create a sub critical wave guide similar to the "Junk" from "1996" here at 35.55 onwards.
Im not aware of any supporting evidence from "Universities" that detail A: How you'd use atomic deposition to create a sub critical wave guide with the described "mass reduction" properties or B: How it would work on a metamaterial spaceship (or anything else) - to actually reduce mass.
Unless Justice is just making all this up (doesnt seem the type TBH) - the implication seems to be he possibly knows something we dont (and he cant tell us why).
If McCasland was an important person in the chain of information about (postulated) UFOs, might I suggest an alternative to the overly-dramatic action film scenario that the "bad guys" (however you define that) "disappeared" him?
The point is the evidence suggests he has nothing to do with UFO's - but lots to do with terrestrial technologies that could easily fall into the NHI finders keepers scenario.
If I were betting- your speculation (my sympathies for your late husband) is probably partially correct.
It wasn't necessarily the MiB that took McCasland- it might have been the compounding burden of maintaining "forbidden knowledge"' alongside his encroaching mental decline.
Last edited: