Building 7 Explained by Edward Current

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Excellently accessible debunking of the Building 7 controlled demolition theory by Edward Current.



And for those who respond to his closing point with "What about the Windsor tower in Madrid". Well, that was a concrete cored building. The steel framed parts DID collapse:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_Tower_(Madrid)

acontrailscience.com_skitch_Debunking_9_11_Conspiracy_Theories640c90f6e39ed31a53c798008b4db1b0.jpg


upload.wikimedia.org_wikipedia_commons_thumb_a_a2_TorreWindsor1.JPG_342px_TorreWindsor1.JPG
 
Last edited:
Excellently accessible debunking of the Building 7 controlled demolition theory by Edward Current.
0:29 Building 7 collapsed simply due to uncontrolled fires - bare assertion.
00:42 Not a proportionally fair representation of the fire/steel ratio in building 7
00:55 Conclusion based on NISTs analysis which was based on incorrect and incomplete data
02:06 To assert that NISTs model is consistent with reality is just plain wrong
02:40 Total collapse is not inevitable for a steel structure on fire, it is unprecedented.
02:47 The steel overpass is not a good comparison at all, and was a partial collapse in any case.
03:15 False claim, steel buildings have had larger, longer lasting fires, and have not collapsed.
03:30 "it's really that simple" - Until you look at the drawings and the explanation, yes.
This video debunks nothing.
 
Back
Top