Billy Kryzak no (yes) bullshit Interdimensional Being

Nourali

Active Member
Billy Kryzak, a video analyst from ProPixel who has appeared alongside Ross Coulthart on NewsNation, claims to have captured an "interdimensional being" on video.


Source: https://x.com/i/status/2069536251716198547


In the comments, he points to an abstract shape and calls it the silhouette of a humanoid. Too bad he somehow missed the reflection of another "humanoid" holding a phone.

41244.jpg
41242.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To me it looks like it could bee nothing more than a bright light (e.g. a garden or driveway light) that's seen through a grubby and/or rain on the window. The movement of the "being" could be movement of trees/bushes in front of the light, due to wind, or if it's raining, then rivulets and rain drops on the glass.

Also... is the "interdimensional being" eating an ice-cream?

Hot weather in the UK the last few days, so my interpretation may be biased.
 
A video from "Magic" Mike Battista? He's got history. He made the same psionic/psyonic claims - with Kryzak as co-conspirator too - and pushed by Ross Coultard as the cherry on top - last year:

Source: https://twitter.com/mbattista25/status/1969106467187016169#m

I think the conclusion from that one was that it's AI enhanced, and therefore bullshit-augmented. So they are about as far from a reliable source as it's possible to get.

Keeps good company, though:

Source: https://twitter.com/DrBeaVillarroel/status/2061473321376768019#m
 
Can't argue with your characterization of that. It doesn't help that people like him use 'dimension' to mean 'other worlds' in much the same way ancient peoples believed in mystical places that could only be accessed under special circumstances or through magical rituals.

The Celtic Otherworld
They use dimension because it's trendy to not call the aliens aliens these days because it seemingly feels good to some people to be able to snark back at anyone who calls them "aliens"
 
This zooming in on bright lights in poor quality pixelated digital videos trying to see detail that isnt there is not new. It was done with Kumburgaz video when people said they could see alien heads through the spaceship's hatch...

https://archivosovni2.blogspot.com/


It seems to have reached now heights of incredulousness with the advent of AI assisted image enhancement and the preponderance of 'orb' videos showing a bright light. Bledsoe is often the source and the enhancement is often done by people like Peter Osbourne and Billy Kryzek , which is nothing short of computer-assisted delusion.



Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIgQPUDZVfE
 
Last edited:
Billy Kryzak, a video analyst from ProPixel
ProPixel is just Billy's photography business; it's just him doing standard photography (weddings, portraits, real estate, etc). It's nothing to do with video or photo forensics. Based on his X timeline, he seems to have got caught up in the NJ drone panic in Dec 2024. His posts are popular with the UFO crowd, but he's increasingly just claiming to have captured alien/NHI craft, and he uses lots of "enhancement" to bring things out of ambiguous images.

He initially seemed halfway reasonable, and he does show good footage sometimes. But he's seemingly moved further down the rabbit hole. He blocked me on X as I was causing him mental distress.
 
Bledsoe is often the source and the enhancement is often done by people like Peter Osbourne and Billy Kryzek , which is nothing short of computer-assisted delusion.

To be honest I think it's more than that. I doubt think the alphanumerics on Chris Bledsoe's globe are the result of undirected "enhancement".
I suspect they are there by design. And not by ETI.

"I had my friends who have some abilities in digital image manipulation look at my footage; it seems the mystery orb was displaying what might be letters from my surname. What can it possibly mean?"

Billy Kryzak has a UFO-related YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@BillyKryzak
ProPixel Imaging website https://www.propixelimaging.com/, I think he's a pretty good photographer. The image of a woman posed in front of an aircraft carrier bow (Portfolio, Lifestyle & Portrait) is clearly not a naturalistic image, but nor is it claimed to be.
 
Is it reasonable that UFO personalities should be asked to stand by or dismiss or acknowledge in some way the related claims of the people they associate with at UFO events? Or is it unfair that we assume that just because they get a photo together that say Villaroel should be asked about Mike Battista's Utah psionic orbs? (Starlink) or Chris Bledoe's ISS videos.

Is it unreasonable to expect consistency about the details from the UFO scene?
 
Back
Top