Listening to MJM's latest interview on RadioFreeBlood
which begins @ 1hr:29mins into the show. MJM again gives mixed signals on what to expect. If I heard this in isolation, I'm left with the impression the plan is to make a (call to action) film that will go mainstream (or at least be professional/slick enough). Obviously this needs funding and the only donation option I've found is under the guise of (quote) a possible class action lawsuit
In MJM's words (1hr:58mins) after surmising that his two previous films contain adequate information (presumably he means evidence/proof?) "the goals and objectives of this film are to motivate people and(?) getting involved both legally and legislatively......it's not geared so much as being informational, we've given enough information, but is a call to action film and our goals and objectives are getting this on to the mainstream, so this is something we can bring into future United Nations meetings, future debates, future legislative initiatives and that's our goal, to motivate people to stand up (inaudible, talked over)..."
He also boasted "an all-star team" and says his editor is Tina Imahara
who does seem quite the sort of professional required. As he's using the past and present tense, I think it's fair to assume her fees are or will be funded from donations.
Around 1hr59mins, when asked, "..for my listeners to understand, where does this start, who are we suing, I mean if they don't admit this program exists...is it class action on the part of victims here, because I know you were working on that last time and try and find or recruit people who have been victimised by geoengineering?"
MJM goes onto to say "We're not disclosing all the information in terms of specifically where we're going and we're still gaining, er obtaining resources to study this very closely but here's the very concept of the lawsuit; we're going up our aerosol collection project, we have plans to going into the skies of maui, what they're doing, they're using ship-based aerosols, we see them on satellite and visually as well, and they're putting aersols from ships, huge plumes into our skies putting storm-fronts and whatever else they're doing with these aerosols, so we have a team and we're going through those plumes and take aerosol samples, also photographic evidence, we can conclusively prove, no question about it that geoengineering is occuring...with that, our goal is to go into court and sue, whether it's corporations, governments who are moving forward with mandates, because there are damages with these taxes, California now has carbon tax based on carbon models that can be proven to be flawed, so that is the concept". The radio host doesn't seem to agree and tells Michael AGW is happening but agrees we need to seperate this from geoengineering causes.
p.s. Anyone else notice he's dropped "shade of" from the title?