American involvement in Syria: Theory or fact?

You don't read a lot about Russia, do you? To compare Putin to either Pres Bush or Pres Obama is silly, to say the least. I disliked Pres Bush and to be honest, his overreaching for power worried me. But a new election was held and he retired from office.


Many have spent months in cells awaiting trial and face long jail terms for crowd violence.

With his streetwise rhetoric and charisma, Navalny emerged as the most effective of the opposition leaders who led the unprecedented protests against Putin. ...
Content from External Source

http://www.thejournal.ie/putin-russia-opponent-prison-998133-Jul2013/




Mikhail Borisovich Khodorkovsky (Russian: Михаи́л Бори́сович Ходорко́вский, IPA: [mʲɪxɐˈil xədɐˈrkofskʲɪj]; born 26 June 1963) is a former Russian oligarch[1] and businessman. In 2004, Khodorkovsky was the wealthiest man in Russia and one of the richest people in the world, ranked 16th on Forbes list of billionaires. ...
There is on-going debate about whether the trials and sentencing were politically motivated.[2][3] The trial process has received criticism from abroad for its lack of due process. Khodorkovsky has lodged several applications to the European Court of Human Rights, seeking redress for alleged violations by Russia of his human rights. In response to his first application, which concerned events from 2003 to 2005, the court found that several violations were committed by the Russian authorities in their treatment of Khodorkovsky.[4] In particular, the court ruled that Khodorkovsky's arrest was "unlawful as it had been made with a purpose different from the one expressed."[5] Despite these findings, the court ultimately ruled that the trial was not politically motivated,[6][7][8] but rather "that the charges against him were grounded in 'reasonable suspicion'".[7]

He is considered to be a prisoner of conscience by Amnesty International. ...
February, 2003, at a televised meeting at the Kremlin, Khodorkovsky argued with Putin about corruption. He implied that major government officials were accepting millions in bribes. Putin privately told Lord John Browne, the former head of BP, "I have eaten more dirt than I need to from that man."[14]

In early 2012, prior to the Russian presidential election, writer and activist Masha Gessen wrote that Khodorkovsky and Putin had both underestimated each other. "During his eight years in confinement, Khodorkovsky has become Russia’s most trusted public figure and Putin’s biggest political liability. As long as Putin rules Russia and Khodorkovsky continues to act like Khodorkovsky, Khodorkovsky will remain in prison—and Putin will remain terrified of him.
Judicial controversy

On 14 February 2011, Natalya Vasilyeva, an assistant to the judge who convicted Khodorkovsky, Viktor Danilkin, said that the judge did not write the verdict, and had read it against his will.[20] Essentially, Natalya Vasilyeva said the judge's verdict was "brought from the Moscow City Court".[30] In her statement she also noted that "everyone in the judicial community understands perfectly that this is a rigged case, a fixed trial".[30] On 24 February Vasilyeva underwent a polygraph test, which indicated that she likely believes that Danilkin acted under pressure.[31] Judge Danilkin responded that "the assertion by Natalya Vasilyeva was nothing more than slander"

Content from External Source


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Khodorkovsky



Vasily Georgievich Aleksanyan (Russian: Васи́лий Гео́ргиевич Алексаня́н, Armenian: Վասիլի Ալեքսանյան; December 15, 1971[1] – October 2, 2011) was a Russian lawyer, businessman, and a former Executive Vice President of Yukos oil company. On 6 April 2006 he was arrested as a suspected accomplice to tax evasion and money laundering.[2] After a decision by European Court of Human Rights, he was released on a bond in January 12, 2009, dying from complications of AIDS on 2 October 2011.
Content from External Source




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...oot-state-Last-words-Moscow-lawyer-death-scre

Sergei was 36 and worked for a boutique American law firm called Firestone Duncan. He was a tall man with dark hair and a soft handshake who could do ten things in the time it took others to do one. He was a man of clarity and precision.

He said he knew the law and that he had done nothing wrong. Moreover, he said these police officers had stolen an enormous amount of money from his country and he wanted to make sure that they were brought to trial. So he stayed.

In fact, Sergei’s belief in justice was so strong that he testified against the police officers, judges, and criminals involved in the $230 million theft – a prospect most Russians would regard with terror.

Then, one month after his testimony, on November 24, 2008, the Russian establishment made its response. Two police officers arrested Sergei in front of his wife and two young children. It later emerged they had worked with one of the policemen against whom he had testified.

...

He was put in cells with neither heating nor window panes – in December in Moscow – so he nearly froze to death. He was put in cells with just a hole in the floor as a toilet and from where sewage would bubble up. The authorities wanted him to withdraw his testimony against the police officers and sign a false confession saying he had stolen the $230 million.

How do we know all this? Because Sergei wrote it down. In the 358 days he was in detention without trial, he kept a diary, passed out via his lawyers month by month, and filed 450 complaints detailing how he was being mistreated. As a result, his has become the most well-documented human rights abuse case that has come out of Russia in the past 25 years.

After six months, Sergei’s health began to deteriorate alarmingly. He lost 3st, developed serious stomach pains and was diagnosed as having pancreatitis and gallstones and needed an operation, which was scheduled for August 1, 2009.

One week before the operation, he was abruptly moved to Butyrka, a maximum-security prison considered to be one of the toughest in Russia. At Butyrka, which lacked any proper medical facilities, he suffered constant, agonising pain from his untreated pancreatitis and he was refused medical treatment.

His cellmate banged on the door for hours screaming for a doctor. When one finally arrived, he refused to do anything for Sergei, telling him he should have obtained medical treatment before his arrest. Sergei wrote 20 requests to be treated and every one was either ignored or rejected. The investigators came to him again and again saying all he had to do to end the situation was to sign a false confession

...

On November 13, Sergei was suffering agonising pain and appealed to prison authorities for medical help. The doctors did not see him until three days later.

On the night of November 16, Sergei was moved to a different prison with a hospital. But when he arrived, instead of sending him for treatment, they put him in an isolation cell, handcuffed him and allowed eight riot guards to beat him with rubber batons until he was dead.

This is a regime where a man’s life means nothing. Where officials and criminals are allowed to work together to steal from their own people and those who expose them are repressed and killed. We don’t know if President Putin was a direct beneficiary in the $230 million theft or had an involvement in Sergei’s torture and murder, but he is ultimately responsible for the cover-up that ensued.

You don’t have to dig very deep to find numerous other examples.

Just two weeks ago Leonid Razvozzhayev, a prominent member of the opposition, was kidnapped in Ukraine by Russian secret policemen, threatened that he and his family members would be killed and then forced into signing a false confession.

This follows the arrest and jailing for two years of two young mothers from the Pussy Riot punk group for releasing a 40-second song on YouTube criticising Putin.

According to a major Russian think-tank that advises the president, one out of every six businessmen has been subject to a criminal investigation. The lawlessness has reached epidemic proportions.

Content from External Source
 
You don't read a lot about Russia, do you? To compare Putin to either Pres Bush or Pres Obama is silly, to say the least. I disliked Pres Bush and to be honest, his overreaching for power worried me. But a new election was held and he retired from office.

Heh. Worried ya, huh? He not only reached for power, he grabbed it and got it, just like Uncle Dick encouraged him to do. Once they left it was sitting there for the leaner, meaner more hopeful version to come in and ignore whatever whiff of a mandate he had and double down on everything we hated about W right down the line.

Forget all the legislation swamp as that's just scut work for dicatators. Focus instead on the three fundamentals any dictator worthy of the name would focus on before all else: military might, civil control, and intelligence. As far as real dictatorial muscle, Putin is bush league compared to W and O.

Our military might is unchallenged in all the world. It's simply indisputable who has more bang in the box and that right there is the big stick that prods the play a certain way. A timely issue is the petrodollar, which only exists because of the backing which is the bang in the box. The rest of the world doesn't want it, especially Iran, and they are tied in with Syria. This war isn't about the people in Syria no matter who says what on that score.

Civil control is the finest money can buy and it's to the point now where new stories of police overkill are met with a yawn. The hardware available to our now militarized police forces nation wide is the stuff of dictatorial wet dreams, never mind that folks don't even mind it enough to notice. Well, except the megaphone bunch, and just needing one shows how far away they are from the manstream's ear. They couldn't even get attention when they were right about all these bullets.

The rubicon has been crossed. I saw it pass by the other day. There was a story about the weather service buying more hollow points. Same old stuff about target practice, yadda. But what was new was the answer to the question about why spend the extra money since nobody uses hollow points for target practice. Well, said the guy, you always want to practice with something that is as close to what you would use in a live situation.

Makes sense. And it didn't raise a peep. It's a total non-story when a guy in a gov dept not known for packing says something as sinister as shooting folks with hollow points and it doesn't even penetrate the media fog. Not only that, but the recent change in the law so that you can now pump in propaganda to the media also doesn't raise an eyebrow.

Which brings us to the alphabet soup of intelligence, with the nsa, the cia, and all the ones we never hear about nor understand what they do. The government's capacity and willingness to gather the stuff from every imaginable source in every possible way we is unmatched in human history and the fun is only beginning. The advances in metrics and all the other stuff churning out of this vastly competitive industry is mindboggling. The abuses already are too numerous to keep track of and have become pat of the wallpaper because nobody can do anything to stop that and more are on the way, with the blessings of those who don't want to stop them, seeing them as the price you have to pay for Keeping Us Safe.

So on the score of the big dictatorial three, we do what we want, when we want, and there's not much anyone can do to stop it if they wanted to. The face out front might change, but the machine chugs along unabated.

I guarantee you that if you could read Hitler or Stalin's deepest and darkest regret, the one that hurts the most, it would be that they were born 80 years too early.
 
So you think they can now? they can't, Have you heard about the group, Pussy Riot? I guess not.

Figures, their big civil rights violation was to be framed based on "Pussy Riot" and we have Bradley Manning, Snowden and other serious minded whistle blowers. And which does a "flat minded" person tend to care about if they're presented to them to "hear about" in the corporate media? Pussy Riot. (2 years for rioting is a bit excessive... isn't it? But there again, Manning and Snowden are threatened with execution and torture for trying to whistle blow.)

Apparently Hillary should be sent to Russia to tell them that we'll give up on getting Snowden back if they let us take "Pussy Riot" to the land of the free, where pussies can riot. Otherwise we might have an international incident here.
 
Which brings us to the alphabet soup of intelligence, with the nsa, the cia, and all the ones we never hear about nor understand what they do. The government's capacity and willingness to gather the stuff from every imaginable source in every possible way we is unmatched in human history and the fun is only beginning.

Here's a perfect example: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-program-online-data


A top secret National Security Agency program allows analysts to search with no prior authorization through vast databases containing emails, online chats and the browsing histories of millions of individuals, according to documents provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The NSA boasts in training materials that the program, called XKeyscore, is its "widest-reaching" system for developing intelligence from the internet.
Content from External Source
 
Back
Top