Really sorry if this is the wrong place, seems like people here know their stuff. All this 2027 chatter has got me really scared and worried. Is it all hype is it all fear mongering? I have heard so many stories to alien invasion to it just disclosure. Any re assurance or knowledge to help would be really appreciated
2027 Catastrophe Rumors. Aliens and China.
- Thread starter Smay52
- Start date
The 2027 chatter is really just that, chatter. There's nothing to back it up. If you find it concerning then I'd suggest two things:
1) Look at the actual evidence that something is going to happen. Anyone can make a claim about something, but it's another thing to actuall support that claim. When pushed to give evidence of an alien invasion (real, simulated, or imagined), you won't get much. When they DO give you something, then look at that evidence carefully and try to understand what it actually means, not what they tell you it means.
2) Look at the track record of people making these claims. The alien invasion claim mostly traces back to Clif High, who predicted an alien-human war would start December 3, 2024. It didn't. Same guy predicted a 2008 Vancouver megaquake. Why give him any credence at all?
On a broader scale, the UFO invasion rumor seems to just be a spin-off of concerns that China will invade Taiwan (which it considers part of China) in 2027. Ufologist Leslie Kean once said that "something" big would happen in 2027, which people interpreted as being UFO-related, but she later explained that she was only talking about the world geopolitical situation.
The following AI-generated (verified by me) list shows the various factors that contribute to this rumor, several of which have already expired.
The world is an unpredictable place; you have to go with the flow. Preparing for a baseless alien invasion is really a waste of your valuable time.
1) Look at the actual evidence that something is going to happen. Anyone can make a claim about something, but it's another thing to actuall support that claim. When pushed to give evidence of an alien invasion (real, simulated, or imagined), you won't get much. When they DO give you something, then look at that evidence carefully and try to understand what it actually means, not what they tell you it means.
2) Look at the track record of people making these claims. The alien invasion claim mostly traces back to Clif High, who predicted an alien-human war would start December 3, 2024. It didn't. Same guy predicted a 2008 Vancouver megaquake. Why give him any credence at all?
On a broader scale, the UFO invasion rumor seems to just be a spin-off of concerns that China will invade Taiwan (which it considers part of China) in 2027. Ufologist Leslie Kean once said that "something" big would happen in 2027, which people interpreted as being UFO-related, but she later explained that she was only talking about the world geopolitical situation.
The following AI-generated (verified by me) list shows the various factors that contribute to this rumor, several of which have already expired.
- PLA centennial - The People's Liberation Army (China's military) was founded in 1927. 1927 + 100 = 2027.
- Davidson Window - In 2021, Adm. Phil Davidson (then head of US Indo-Pacific Command) said the China/Taiwan threat was "manifest in the next six years." That landed on 2027.
- Burns/CIA quote - In 2023, CIA Director Bill Burns said US intel knows Xi told the PLA to be ready by 2027. He explicitly added that this doesn't mean Xi has decided to invade.
- 21st CCP Party Congress - The Chinese Communist Party holds a major congress every five years. The next one is autumn 2027, where Xi is expected to lock in a fourth term.
- Pentagon China Military Power Report - The DoD (Department of Defense) annual report keeps citing 2027 as the PLA's capability target.
- CSIS wargame - The Center for Strategic and International Studies ran a 2023 wargame using a 2026 invasion scenario. Often misread as a prediction.
- Minihan memo - In 2023, USAF Gen. Mike Minihan wrote "my gut tells me we will fight in 2025." Already failed.
- AI 2027 - April 2025 scenario paper by Daniel Kokotajlo et al. predicting superintelligent AI by late 2027. The lead author has since moved his estimate to ~2030.
- Clif High / Web Bot - "Predictive linguistics" guy. Predicted an alien-human war on Dec 3, 2024 (didn't happen). Various 2027 doom predictions.
- Ross Coulthart - Australian UFO journalist relaying unnamed-insider rumors about "something" happening in 2027. Walks it back when pressed.
- John Ramirez - Former CIA officer claiming aliens will reveal themselves in 2027.
- Szydagis "catastrophic disclosure" paper - 2024 arXiv paper estimating 14-42% chance of accidental NHI (Non-Human Intelligence) disclosure by 2027. Conditional on aliens existing as an input.
- Saint Malachy / Prophecy of the Popes - 12th-century prophecy (actually a 16th-century forgery) that some interpret as pointing to 2027.
- Evangelical rapture date-setting - Various interpretations (1948 + 70 years, Daniel's 70 weeks, etc.) landing on 2026/2027.
- Project Blue Beam - 1990s conspiracy theory about a faked alien invasion. Currently retro-dated to 2027.
- Economic/demographic pressure on China - Real estate crisis, debt at 312% of GDP, population decline. No specific 2027 trigger but feeds the "peaking China is dangerous" framing.
The world is an unpredictable place; you have to go with the flow. Preparing for a baseless alien invasion is really a waste of your valuable time.
Last edited:
Dave51c
Senior Member
I think you will be fine.
Most of the stuff that is on this site has a mundane explanation. Then there is the spread of "AI" images and computer generated effects which fuel a lot what can be seen online.
There is a whole industry of people who have both overt and covert agenda's to promote all sorts of alien stories - most of which have a financial grift. Some of it may be genuine paranoia or psychosis on their part.
Unfortunately the mainstream media is not equipped to be a rational actor either. They chase sensationalism for views and often provide misinformation because they do not understand the nature of subject and will often platform the very people who have an interest in promoting alien conspiracy stories.
Nothing on this site has any evidence of an advanced, extraterrestrial civilisation. You are right, there are some very skilled investigators here from all backgrounds and disciplines. Most of us are skeptics - for myself not in the everything is bunk tradition but more of a skeptical approach first and then looking for evidence in a scientific and factual basis.
I can imagine that all of what you might see or read online could be very scary without any balance from rational sources. Always worth taking a bit of time to step back and let your mind settle from what might be deliberate shock information to pull you in to someone's agenda. It can be exhausting to deal with. Approaching it with a skeptical mindset can act as self-defence. Until you have a toolset to start to pick apart these claims it can be overwhelming.
I don't know what your background is, but it might be worth reading up on some basic ideas around the vastness of the universe and how we are actually trying really hard to spot any alien civilisation but have so far found nothing. You may already of heard of things like the Fermi paradox which is explained in this video by Brian Cox which, hopefully, gives some context to what you are feeling:
Take care.
Most of the stuff that is on this site has a mundane explanation. Then there is the spread of "AI" images and computer generated effects which fuel a lot what can be seen online.
There is a whole industry of people who have both overt and covert agenda's to promote all sorts of alien stories - most of which have a financial grift. Some of it may be genuine paranoia or psychosis on their part.
Unfortunately the mainstream media is not equipped to be a rational actor either. They chase sensationalism for views and often provide misinformation because they do not understand the nature of subject and will often platform the very people who have an interest in promoting alien conspiracy stories.
Nothing on this site has any evidence of an advanced, extraterrestrial civilisation. You are right, there are some very skilled investigators here from all backgrounds and disciplines. Most of us are skeptics - for myself not in the everything is bunk tradition but more of a skeptical approach first and then looking for evidence in a scientific and factual basis.
I can imagine that all of what you might see or read online could be very scary without any balance from rational sources. Always worth taking a bit of time to step back and let your mind settle from what might be deliberate shock information to pull you in to someone's agenda. It can be exhausting to deal with. Approaching it with a skeptical mindset can act as self-defence. Until you have a toolset to start to pick apart these claims it can be overwhelming.
I don't know what your background is, but it might be worth reading up on some basic ideas around the vastness of the universe and how we are actually trying really hard to spot any alien civilisation but have so far found nothing. You may already of heard of things like the Fermi paradox which is explained in this video by Brian Cox which, hopefully, gives some context to what you are feeling:
Take care.
JMartJr
Senior Member.
Hi!
This sort of dovetails in with the above posts, but one thing to consider is that predictions of some huge and exciting disaster about to befall us all go back a LONG way!
Examples include (but are by no means limited to):
The planet Nibiru (which does not, in fact, exist) was supposed to destroy the Earth in May, 2003, according to someone called Nancy Lieder who said aliens from Zeta Reticuli told her. The Aliens were apparently in error, and when that didn't happen, it was re-predicted by others for 2012, 2017, and assorted other times.
Russian mystic and villain of the animated "Anastasia"movie, Grigori Rasputin, predicted that a fire would consume the Earth and kill most life in 2013.
An alignment of the planets was supposed to wipe us out in May of 2000, for some reason. "Alignments" are not super uncommon, depending on how loosely you define one, and they don;t cause anything to happen any of the times THEY have happened A similar claim was made in a book called "The Jupiter Effect" which said an alignment of the planets in 1992 would destroy us. The earliest example I've found was in 1524, and whenever there is a planetary "alignment," this one goes around again!
Can't forget the Y2K bug, or the 2012 Mayan Calendar disaster, neither of which happened.
God was supposed to arrive on Earth in a flying saucer in 1998, according to the Chinese cult Chen Tao, on March 31, at 10:00 AM, I am not sure if they specified which time zone, but it does not matter now since it didn't happen at any point, all day long!
The Heaven's Gate cult believed that a flying saucer was coming to Earth, hiding behind the comet Hale-Bopp, to take the faithful to Heaven. Similar stories surrounded recent extrasolar comet 3I/ATLAS, which was claimed to be a spacecraft and it was expected to do... something... but instead persisted in doing nothing other than following its trajectory back out into interstellar space. Thankfully THAT bit of silliness did not cost any lives, nearly 40 people killed themselves in the Heaven's Gate tragedy, presuming their souls would ascend to the UFO and be taken to Heaven. In 1974 a group called "Children of God" believed that Comet Kohoutek was going to get us -- in this as in other ways, Kohoutek was a dud.
Pope Innocent III predicted the world would end 666 years after the rise of Islam. That would have been around the year 1284.
The world was to be destroyed by terrible flooding on December 21, 1954, claimed the leader of a UFO cult called Brotherhood of the Seven Rays.
Camille Flammarion predicted that the 1910 appearance of Halley's Comet "would impregnate that atmosphere and possibly snuff out all life on the planet" but not the planet itself. "Comet pills" were sold to protect against toxic gases.
During a large Leonids meteor shower in 1883, several people including Joseph Smith believed that it was a sign of Jesus' second coming. If it was, it was not a sign that second coming would be any time soon!
The Shakers believed the world would end in 1792, and when that didn't happen, in 1794.
Eclipses of the Sun are often promoted as signs of an impending global disaster -- in spite of the fact that there are one or two somewhere in the world almost every year!
Etc... It goes on and on...
The take-away from all this is that predicting alien invasions and the end of the world and other major disasters is a good way to attract attention, and bring in followers, and make money. I am sure that in many cases it is also sincerely believed. But all the many, many, many times this sort of prediction has been made it turns out to be wrong and nothing happens. Given that track record, I would not waste time or lose any sleep over the current example, or the ones that come after that.
(Source of list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events, except for the last one about eclipses, which is from personal observation of online fora.)
Edit: Several typos fixed.
Last edited:
Gary C
Senior Member.
Assuming that your primary source for these worries is things you have read on the internet, the first thing you should definitely do is change your web surfing habits. In case you are not already aware of it, the algorithms that drive web traffic will feed you more of whatever you click on in a self-reinforcing loop until catastrophy and disaster are all you get fed.
There are actually a number of intelligent, non-partisan ways to stay informed without letting some company's AI determine what you should be reading.
Todd Feinman
Senior Member
I used to keep all the old books on the library shelf predicting things were going to end at different dates; the books really began to fill up that shelf up over time, what with Nostradamus and the Mayan prophecies and the year 2000, etc. We just keep on going.
We are a species that loves to predict its own demise, while hurriedly preparing the means for it. I'd watch less news and read less alien stuff. I think things were supposed to end in the '90s too, but forget why.. Anyway, just be careful crossing the street or driving; you're more likely to get hit by a car.
We are a species that loves to predict its own demise, while hurriedly preparing the means for it. I'd watch less news and read less alien stuff. I think things were supposed to end in the '90s too, but forget why.. Anyway, just be careful crossing the street or driving; you're more likely to get hit by a car.
Last edited:
Thanks Mick,
I have followed your work for a while now and always appreciate the grounded approach. I presume if all these people were leaking something super secret why hasn't the government stepped in and stopped it? I think that's what helps me most.
John J.
Senior Member.
Hi @Smay52.
Sadly, none of us can promise each other that we'll all have a happy 2027, though I hope everyone here does!
Whatever problems or misfortunes any or all of us might face in 2027, an alien attack must be one of the least likely.
I do not believe for one minute that anyone has knowledge that such a thing will happen.
To assess the claims of some dreadful alien-related event in 2027, it might be worth watching TV shows where well-known astronomers and other relevant scientists give their views about possible alien life, and/ or reading a few popular science books about astronomy/ space exploration etc.
Most professional astronomers and many other research scientists are employed by university departments, not by the government.
Like the rest of the public, they have different backgrounds and diverse political views. Like (most of) the rest of us, they're usually able to put differences aside in order to cooperate in their work- finding out more about the universe.
There is no indication they are being suppressed or censored by government (at least in the US, "Western" countries and many others).
Carl Sagan, a prominent advocate of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, was arrested during a protest against US nuclear testing. But neither his professional work or his role in educating the public about science were affected, he wasn't "cancelled".
There seems to be a broad consensus amongst astronomers and scientists who study the findings of spaceprobes etc., and others with relevant knowledge (certain physicists, chemists, biologists and others):
(1) Extraterrestrial life is possible. From what we know about the history of Earth and what we think we know about other stars and their planets, life might have arisen elsewhere. If it has, we have no idea how commonplace it might be, just guesses.
(1a) But if extraterrestrial life exists, we haven't seen any. No-one has found good evidence of life elsewhere, of any sort. Some things that might have been possible evidence of extraterrestrial life- e.g. fossil evidence of microbes in some meteorites, trace gases in the atmosphere of Venus, are now widely thought to be due to non-biological processes. Some thought features on Mars as seen from Earth were canals or patches of vegetation, we now know they weren't.
But it shows scientists are prepared to consider the possibility of extraterrestrial life, do not hide their thoughts about it, and are not censored.
(2) Extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) might be a possibility. We're here, and if extraterrestrial life is possible, it might evolve intelligence too.
(2a) But if ETI exists, it is almost certainly much rarer than extraterrestrial life generally. Which we have yet to detect, see (1a).
There have been millions of multicellular species over hundreds of millions of years on Earth, a species with complex technology has arisen once, recently. Our very close relatives, the Neanderthals, were around longer than us but their technology progressed little. We don't know why.
(2b) There is currently no evidence, at all, of the existence of ETI. The lack of evidence of ETI has struck some scientists, giving rise to the Fermi paradox ("Where is everybody?") and discussion about "the big silence", the fact that we haven't detected signals from other species.
Sending radio signals over interstellar distances is relatively cheap and simple, even humans can do it. A species interested in establishing contact with others might choose to use radio signals even if they used other technologies for communication within their culture.
(2c) Reports of UFOs and meetings with aliens do not constitute evidence of ETI. There is no reliable, testable evidence that any UFO sighting, or even photo/ film/ video, shows an ETI craft. We do know people can be mistaken, and that people have made hoax UFO photos, some of which have convinced "believers" for many years- sometimes even after they've been shown to be hoaxes.
There are many famous UFO sightings, some discussed on this forum. None demonstrate that aliens exist, unless we accept that the claimants are telling the truth and are accurately recounting what happened. We know people can make extraordinary misidentifications in good faith, and (rarely) can have extraordinary, complex experiences which seem very real to them but which are probably subjective.
Some people claim to have met and even communicated with aliens But nothing they tell us has ever been anything useful, nothing new that can be used, and nothing that demonstrates these aliens actually exist.
Throughout history, probably in all cultures, people have reported seeing, and sometimes interacting with, strange things and non-human entities. People in past times believed reports of witches and fairies. Many respectable people have had encounters with figures from their religious traditions, but it must be unlikely all religious traditions are objectively correct.
I'm generalizing when I say there is a consensus. Some astronomers and related folk think differently. Avi Loeb thinks objects from interstellar space detected in our solar system, e.g. Oumuamua, might be of ETI origin. But this is very much a minority view, and Loeb hasn't claimed this is firm evidence of ETI.
Fred Hoyle was an astronomer who explained how different elements were made in stars, he also had unusual (and almost certainly wrong) views about extraterrestrial life, e.g. disease outbreaks being caused by comets (carrying bacteria strains which we know exist on Earth).
As in any profession, there will be small numbers with unusual beliefs. There are geologists and medical doctors who believe Earth, and humankind, were created around 6000 BC because of their interpretation of the Bible. They are probably wrong.
With people making claims about aliens in 2027, we have to ask:
(1) What evidence do they have that aliens exist at all? Because they haven't shared it.
(2) How would they know what a hypothetical ETI, whose existence they are unable to prove, is planning to do?
Human history has many examples of surprise attacks, Trojan Horse onwards. Equally military attacks are sometimes anticipated: Military forces are seen massing near a border, signals are intercepted, plans revealed by espionage or accidental leaks.
But in this case, how would the 2027 claimants know anything like this? Did a visiting UFO drop a folder with invasion plans? That they could read? Have they been tracking ETI spacecraft (no, or they'd provide evidence) or intercepting ETI communications (no, again no evidence, and how would they interpret the alien language- even assuming ETI military comms are unencrypted?)
There's a lot of nonsense on the internet. Pretty much anyone can post pretty much anything. It isn't hard to find groups supporting unusual and sometimes unpleasant, even dangerous views. There's a lot of deliberately fake news stories and "science" items. I suspect many people involved in producing them don't really believe them themselves.
The major news outlets with pre-internet origins (national broadcasters, newspapers) all have their faults, they all make mistakes and some are politically biased, but in many cases they are more reliable than many internet forums/ blogs/ "influencers". Some have a record of investigative journalism that has revealed important things we wouldn't otherwise have known about. AFAIK no significant traditional news producer has raised any concerns about aliens in 2027. They have, in several countries, carried stories which have contributed to the downfall of governments, so it's unlikely they're all controlled by the government (same goes for intelligence agencies; stories embarrassing to e.g. the CIA, MI6 are not all suppressed).
@Smay52, you could make a note of the 2027 claims that concern you, and make a point of checking them once in a while through 2027.
Try not to be too preoccupied with them, though. Sometimes, distracted, we let other important things slip by- including having fun or being happy.
I predict that by the end of 2027, there won't have been anything resembling an unambiguous alien attack.
I doubt that we'll find convincing evidence for the existence of ETI in 2027.
Bad things will happen in 2027; there will be disease outbreaks, natural disasters, aircraft crashes, armed conflict/ violent incidents.
Beware anyone saying these are due to hidden alien activity, and therefore evidence for their 2027 claims. Sadly, these things happen and they don't require aliens.
Sadly, none of us can promise each other that we'll all have a happy 2027, though I hope everyone here does!
Whatever problems or misfortunes any or all of us might face in 2027, an alien attack must be one of the least likely.
I do not believe for one minute that anyone has knowledge that such a thing will happen.
To assess the claims of some dreadful alien-related event in 2027, it might be worth watching TV shows where well-known astronomers and other relevant scientists give their views about possible alien life, and/ or reading a few popular science books about astronomy/ space exploration etc.
Most professional astronomers and many other research scientists are employed by university departments, not by the government.
Like the rest of the public, they have different backgrounds and diverse political views. Like (most of) the rest of us, they're usually able to put differences aside in order to cooperate in their work- finding out more about the universe.
There is no indication they are being suppressed or censored by government (at least in the US, "Western" countries and many others).
Carl Sagan, a prominent advocate of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, was arrested during a protest against US nuclear testing. But neither his professional work or his role in educating the public about science were affected, he wasn't "cancelled".
There seems to be a broad consensus amongst astronomers and scientists who study the findings of spaceprobes etc., and others with relevant knowledge (certain physicists, chemists, biologists and others):
(1) Extraterrestrial life is possible. From what we know about the history of Earth and what we think we know about other stars and their planets, life might have arisen elsewhere. If it has, we have no idea how commonplace it might be, just guesses.
(1a) But if extraterrestrial life exists, we haven't seen any. No-one has found good evidence of life elsewhere, of any sort. Some things that might have been possible evidence of extraterrestrial life- e.g. fossil evidence of microbes in some meteorites, trace gases in the atmosphere of Venus, are now widely thought to be due to non-biological processes. Some thought features on Mars as seen from Earth were canals or patches of vegetation, we now know they weren't.
But it shows scientists are prepared to consider the possibility of extraterrestrial life, do not hide their thoughts about it, and are not censored.
(2) Extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) might be a possibility. We're here, and if extraterrestrial life is possible, it might evolve intelligence too.
(2a) But if ETI exists, it is almost certainly much rarer than extraterrestrial life generally. Which we have yet to detect, see (1a).
There have been millions of multicellular species over hundreds of millions of years on Earth, a species with complex technology has arisen once, recently. Our very close relatives, the Neanderthals, were around longer than us but their technology progressed little. We don't know why.
(2b) There is currently no evidence, at all, of the existence of ETI. The lack of evidence of ETI has struck some scientists, giving rise to the Fermi paradox ("Where is everybody?") and discussion about "the big silence", the fact that we haven't detected signals from other species.
Sending radio signals over interstellar distances is relatively cheap and simple, even humans can do it. A species interested in establishing contact with others might choose to use radio signals even if they used other technologies for communication within their culture.
(2c) Reports of UFOs and meetings with aliens do not constitute evidence of ETI. There is no reliable, testable evidence that any UFO sighting, or even photo/ film/ video, shows an ETI craft. We do know people can be mistaken, and that people have made hoax UFO photos, some of which have convinced "believers" for many years- sometimes even after they've been shown to be hoaxes.
There are many famous UFO sightings, some discussed on this forum. None demonstrate that aliens exist, unless we accept that the claimants are telling the truth and are accurately recounting what happened. We know people can make extraordinary misidentifications in good faith, and (rarely) can have extraordinary, complex experiences which seem very real to them but which are probably subjective.
Some people claim to have met and even communicated with aliens But nothing they tell us has ever been anything useful, nothing new that can be used, and nothing that demonstrates these aliens actually exist.
Throughout history, probably in all cultures, people have reported seeing, and sometimes interacting with, strange things and non-human entities. People in past times believed reports of witches and fairies. Many respectable people have had encounters with figures from their religious traditions, but it must be unlikely all religious traditions are objectively correct.
I'm generalizing when I say there is a consensus. Some astronomers and related folk think differently. Avi Loeb thinks objects from interstellar space detected in our solar system, e.g. Oumuamua, might be of ETI origin. But this is very much a minority view, and Loeb hasn't claimed this is firm evidence of ETI.
Fred Hoyle was an astronomer who explained how different elements were made in stars, he also had unusual (and almost certainly wrong) views about extraterrestrial life, e.g. disease outbreaks being caused by comets (carrying bacteria strains which we know exist on Earth).
As in any profession, there will be small numbers with unusual beliefs. There are geologists and medical doctors who believe Earth, and humankind, were created around 6000 BC because of their interpretation of the Bible. They are probably wrong.
With people making claims about aliens in 2027, we have to ask:
(1) What evidence do they have that aliens exist at all? Because they haven't shared it.
(2) How would they know what a hypothetical ETI, whose existence they are unable to prove, is planning to do?
Human history has many examples of surprise attacks, Trojan Horse onwards. Equally military attacks are sometimes anticipated: Military forces are seen massing near a border, signals are intercepted, plans revealed by espionage or accidental leaks.
But in this case, how would the 2027 claimants know anything like this? Did a visiting UFO drop a folder with invasion plans? That they could read? Have they been tracking ETI spacecraft (no, or they'd provide evidence) or intercepting ETI communications (no, again no evidence, and how would they interpret the alien language- even assuming ETI military comms are unencrypted?)
There's a lot of nonsense on the internet. Pretty much anyone can post pretty much anything. It isn't hard to find groups supporting unusual and sometimes unpleasant, even dangerous views. There's a lot of deliberately fake news stories and "science" items. I suspect many people involved in producing them don't really believe them themselves.
The major news outlets with pre-internet origins (national broadcasters, newspapers) all have their faults, they all make mistakes and some are politically biased, but in many cases they are more reliable than many internet forums/ blogs/ "influencers". Some have a record of investigative journalism that has revealed important things we wouldn't otherwise have known about. AFAIK no significant traditional news producer has raised any concerns about aliens in 2027. They have, in several countries, carried stories which have contributed to the downfall of governments, so it's unlikely they're all controlled by the government (same goes for intelligence agencies; stories embarrassing to e.g. the CIA, MI6 are not all suppressed).
@Smay52, you could make a note of the 2027 claims that concern you, and make a point of checking them once in a while through 2027.
Try not to be too preoccupied with them, though. Sometimes, distracted, we let other important things slip by- including having fun or being happy.
I predict that by the end of 2027, there won't have been anything resembling an unambiguous alien attack.
I doubt that we'll find convincing evidence for the existence of ETI in 2027.
Bad things will happen in 2027; there will be disease outbreaks, natural disasters, aircraft crashes, armed conflict/ violent incidents.
Beware anyone saying these are due to hidden alien activity, and therefore evidence for their 2027 claims. Sadly, these things happen and they don't require aliens.
Last edited:
Thank you, reading this helped. Having a grounded approach helps me. It's hard to shake out of my head that people like Elizondo, Coulthard and co have these government insider sources.
Gary C
Senior Member.
NorCal Dave
Senior Member.
Welcome to the forum. As for "insider sources", this is something we do struggle with here. Various people will make claims of all kinds of things, from alien invasions to war with China, and they will back these claims up with "insider sources" or "high ranking officials". It can sound compelling.
The thing to do is stop and think about it for a minute. These sources are anonymous, at least to us, as we don't know who they are, and more importantly we don't really know what they said. We have to take the word of the person sharing the information that they are passing the information on correctly. Maybe they misunderstood what they were being told. We have examples of that happening. Maybe the source wants to elicit a reaction of some sort by passing the information on. Maybe there is no real source and we're being told a tall tale.
Elaborate claims from anonymous sources require further evidence than just "some insider said this".
I've been looking for that section, thank you. I found navigating the site on mobile sometimes a bit iffy.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
European report on the spread of mis/disinformation on social media platforms
- Latest: Smythe Bacchus
-
-
-
Trending content
-
-
-
Thread 'European report on the spread of mis/disinformation on social media platforms'
- MonkeeSage
Replies: 10 -
-
