WeedWhacker
Senior Member
Yes, but do you believe that this is a facebook group of actual 'chemtrail' pilots?
That's funny....I mean, just thinking about it makes me chuckle.
Yes, but do you believe that this is a facebook group of actual 'chemtrail' pilots?
"I used to be a 4'9" Asian woman and now I am strapping 6' 2" Caucasian man all thanks to Chemtrails"
Before Chemtrails I was just a normal person but now I have developed super intelligence and spider like climbing abilities and I'm quite concerned where this is heading
Hey y'all, I'm new to the group. I have a warehouse full of Durnitizers and de-fluxed Forbilators that are extremely effective at neutralizing the DiHydrogen Monoxide around your home when installed at the four cardinal points of the compass outside your walls. They are powered by standard Flux Capacitors (not included) and come with a one year factory warranty.
I'm giving these beauties away at just $1995.00 per set, plus shipping and handling. Hurry and order yours tomorrow before noon Pacific time for rush delivery before Christmas.
This is the perfect gift for your favorite prepper or tinfoil hat wearer. Order today!!!
- Michael CranstonCan somebody please explain why chemtrails turned both of my ex wives into monsters? We were quite happy on our wedding days but within a few short months chemtrails madde them impossible to get along with.
Like · Reply · 4 · Yesterday at 07:36
Andrew MasonOver exposure to dihydrogen monoxide mixed with electrolytes.
Like · 2 · Yesterday at 07:38
Patrick McKillipScary thought, Mike; maybe THEY were immune to the "stuff"...
Like · 1 · Yesterday at 14:43
Write a reply...
- Michael J KnickFruit Cake calling Condensation trails Chem. trails
Yes there are by products of combustion but let's no travel at all now who's smoking what out there.
Get a life!
Like · Reply · 1 · 16 hours ago
James EdwardsGet out of here with your science and logic. Don't you think we've tried telling them the facts and truth?
if you can't beat em, capitalize on it!
Like · 2 hours ago
Michael J KnickFunny man
Like · 45 minutes ago
it was a follow up question to the 6'2" guy who USED to be a 4' 9" Asian woman.I am...(laughing so hard)...I find it difficult to type....because....
"Don't you miss your boobs?"....I don't even know the 'context' of that sentence....but it is STILL funny...(just me, with the thirteen-year-old inside me....oh wait, I need to re-phrase that.... )....
But to the (imaginary) teenager that inhabits all of us
& don't mess with the she dog!! ;-)
Weed and Efft I think it is time to go to the naughty corner
Yes, we get the humour, there is a time and place for that. What I am trying to say here is Metabunk is doing a fantastic job and this kind of humour is detracting from the good work. Weed and Efft I think it is time to go to the naughty corner and read the Posting Guidelines & don't mess with the she dog!! ;-)
So, please:
- Do not insult people either directly or indirectly
- Do not call them names, such as "stupid", "ignorant", "uneducated", or "liar"
- Do not describe their theory as "stupid", "moronic", "idiotic", "delusional", etc
- Do not suggest they get an education, or take some classes
- Do not criticize their spelling or grammar
- Do not respond to the tone of their post instead of the content
- Do not mock people, or make jokes at their expense
- Do not suggest they are mentally ill, or that they need help
- Do not suggest anyone who believes in [any particular theory] is mentally ill.
Instead of giving people actual facts to chew on, these kind of satire sites just mock people and also give them some more "evidence" that is it is happening. It really doesn't help address the problem and get people to see the actual truth, by understanding the science behind clouds and contrails.
I think my intention in adding them to this thread was more to show that there is MUCH CLEAR EVIDENCE of satire on that page.
but I think we all agree here that it might be funny, but it is certainly NOT BIG OR CLEVER.
I am hopping we won't have to deploy SRM however if it comes to that I will be ok
i dont like ICA myself as i dont think they make the satire clear enough in their main threads. and not everyone reads 'comments'. And i respect what you are saying about being protective of your friends.Yeah I get what you are all saying and maybe it does deter some but it didn't deter me. Even when I was a very fringe chemtrail believer I could see ICA was a joke pretty quickly. It left me not trusting any debunkers tho and that didn't help me. The reason I don't like the page is more about ethics which could be another discussion. It is a concern how upset people have become over chemtrails or thinking geoengineering is happening now (the latter being me a few months ago). I appreciate your discussions it helps to keep the balance and I very much understand the frustration and the need for humour, just some of those people are my friends and I feel protective of them.
PLEASE do not "diminish" yourself.....YOU are very, very smart.Some actually ARE mentally ill, some are mentally ill but in the normal way like alot of us are, some are just trolls, some really are uneducated - especially in areas like 'how' to research or how to discern good data from 'wonky' data. And some CTs really are liars... just like ICA are liars.
Hi Lisa, I really appreciate your input and perspective...it always helps to hear from people who have viewedYeah I get what you are all saying and maybe it does deter some but it didn't deter me. Even when I was a very fringe chemtrail believer I could see ICA was a joke pretty quickly. It left me not trusting any debunkers tho and that didn't help me. The reason I don't like the page is more about ethics which could be another discussion. It is a concern how upset people have become over chemtrails or thinking geoengineering is happening now (the latter being me a few months ago). I am still very interested in where the future of SRM or climate engineering is going however I see it in a different light now. I am hopping we won't have to deploy SRM however if it comes to that I will be ok, maybe not so ok with nuclear power tho. And I don't think I would be too concerned with field testing as long as it is transparent that it is happening and the results are open to the public. I appreciate your discussions it helps to keep the balance and I very much understand the frustration and the need for humour, just some of those people are my friends and I feel protective of them.
Your personal circumstances are illuminating...but you might not be the most typical former believer.
In fact, the very fact that you're here now suggests that you are probably not typical of "believers."
i think thats what @Lisa P was getting at, that mocking people or calling them uneducated (here at MEtabunk) does not equal 'taking people seriously'.If they want a skeptical place that takes them seriously, they have this place to go to
Metabunk is about bunk. It doesnt matter who is spreading the bunk. ICA is spreading bunk. (hence the debunks of their claims).
I have seen this argument put forward a few times.The very fact that we're sitting here debunking chemtrails all day means there's must be something to it, to the CT mindset. So should we stop doing it then?
Nicely said.Well how about because I don't want the world slipping into a new dark ages,devoid of reason and sense, but full of superstition and fear, where I can be burnt as a witch simply because I understand some real science, or because I weigh the same as a duck.
To me it seems they share the same goal that metabunk does, in the big picture.
Mick, I feel really weird disagreeing with you on this, since you've spent so much more time debunking than I havePerhaps they think they do, but their actions are not compatible with those goals. There's simply no way this is helpful. It just adds noise. Those who recognize it as satire think that it's just there to cloud the truth - a form of disinformation. Those who do not recognize it as satire just fall deeper down the rabbit hole. It does not help anyone, it just makes it harder to debunk things. Yes it's funny, but it's a problem.
yea but what percentage? women are mocked for nagging ALL the time everywhere and we still do it. (because we're right : )will see that believers are being viewed/mocked as gullible clowns, and head the other direction.
What if it's 25%? 30%?yea but what percentage? women are mocked for nagging ALL the time everywhere and we still do it. (because we're right : )
say .001% of believers will head teh other way, then figure what are the chances those particular .001% will even see this page OR understand it as satire?
we'll do an experiment. i'll mock 10 of you over the next few weeks and we'll see if any of you change your behaviorsWhat if it's 25%? 30%?
Okay, you should probably start your mocking w/ WW , but remember,we'll do an experiment. i'll mock 10 of you over the next few weeks and we'll see if any of you change your behaviors