Actually, some of them show start/stop in real time. One I've seen is pretty obviously fuel dumps by some fighters. @ about :30, I think.
My guess is that it is one of the US aerobatic teams on their way to a show and testing their smoke system enroute.
I don't know about the US but I know that the Red Arrows keep their website up to date when they were doing training flights etc.Except that there is no tanker evident. The USAF Thunderbirds and the USN Blue Angels travel to an airshow every week during the season... Except this year due to cutbacks. The smoke systems need to be tested in the air. The simultaneous turning on of them is the sort of thing they do. I could be wrong but that is my best guess.
Ooops. I have to 'fess up here. This is not the video I thought is was. As you were. Disregard.Except that there is no tanker evident. The USAF Thunderbirds and the USN Blue Angels travel to an airshow every week during the season... Except this year due to cutbacks. The smoke systems need to be tested in the air. The simultaneous turning on of them is the sort of thing they do. I could be wrong but that is my best guess.
As a lifelong aviation enthusiast used to identifying many types at a glance I find it very intriguing, especially when I'm shown this stuff as 'evidence'.
He keeps on changing his measurements from feet to metres. He mentions he has parachuted. I have done my fair share of that mostly out of a C130 at 1000ft and they tend to be pretty distinctive at that height.
That thumb trick is neat but complex.
Another way to put: a plane with a length (or wingspan) of 100' at 1000' distance would appear visually about the same size as something about 3 and a half inches across at 3 feet away (or about 4 fingers' width at arm's length).Yeah, I'd try to reduce it to something super simple, like "distance is 4000 divided by your thumb"
Unfortunately division is beyond most people's immediate abilities.
He keeps on changing his measurements from feet to metres. He mentions he has parachuted. I have done my fair share of that mostly out of a C130 at 1000ft and they tend to be pretty distinctive at that height.
Yeah, I'd try to reduce it to something super simple, like "distance is 4000 divided by your thumb"
Unfortunately division is beyond most people's immediate abilities.
LOL unfortunately your whole explanation looked like blah blah blah blah blah blah to me. I am terrible at math.
The other issue that comes to light is the constant misinterpretation of altitude. Here is Max Bliss ranting about aircraft he is filming being at low altitude. One he declares is at less than a thousand feet! How on earth can they get it so wrong? Ignorance certainly is Bliss!
"They're looking for us, they have to be..."
Umm.... how do you respond to that type of thinking? You can't.
This is our 3rd black helicopter fly over that I am aware off....the first the following day after setting up our first chembuster.... another visit months later when I made more chembusters... This time may have been because I have started to add a glass jar of white vinegar inbetween the pipes on top of the base ( it may boost the effects), also in London on the Chemtrails Protest day, whilst being interviewed outside DEFRA, I got a chembuster out to discuss and talked about a black helicopter visiting me before... and amazingly right on cue (and filmed for the documentary) a Black helicopter appeared just above us... disappeared over the high buildings and then reappeared over us before flying away. I look forward to that clip in the upcoming documentary of the Chugaboom Tour. I could not see any markings or registration number on this helicopter and I got very close as it was approximately 100m above...there appeared a couple of flashes...that may have been navigation lights but I only saw the 2...which seemed odd.
Really white vinegar is a useful and worth a visit from a 'black helicopter?
It is impossible! Max also believes that the 'Black Unmarked Helicopters' are after him due to his chembusters! Not only in France but also when he is out on protests!
So am I the only one who noticed the helicopter is neither black nor unmarked (there is writing on the tail-boom) ?
Also the powers that be can't have much of an intimidation/surveillance budget if all they can afford to operate is an S-300.
So am I the only one who noticed the helicopter is neither black nor unmarked (there is writing on the tail-boom) ?
Also the powers that be can't have much of an intimidation/surveillance budget if all they can afford to operate is an S-300.
So the powers that be have some kind of sensors that smell vinegar? Then they send a black helicopter to investigate? @@
Umm... when she says this: "This is the face of my online terrorist", of whom is she speaking? She says someone is calling her [names]. Is she associating that behavior with Metabunk? I'm confused.
It's this page...
https://www.facebook.com/ChemtrailsAreVeryReal
...which does't take the most constructive or polite approach to things. MM's w.... comment is referring to this comment by another anon page that have been calling her out on various issues: Chemtrails ... WHERE'S the evidence???
And she's removed (or changed privacy settings) of her and her metabunk sign now. The ChemtrailsAreVeryReal page have a copy here...
Removing references to the w word, as otherwise she'll just point to it here and claim we are repeating it. Best to leave her well alone if possible.
I get that, but how do we ignore her carrying around a sign about Metabunk at a public demonstration?
She's said some pretty nasty things about Mick and Metabunk on her page but when someone calls her out it's off limits apparently.
Despite all of her activity on Facebook against Metabunk she, (or any female) does not deserve to be called a whore. To do so justifies her belief system (in her mind) and it is just plain wrong.
To be fair the phrase was/is "she is an attention w####". That is entirely different and in common usage in the UK where the page originates.
She's just trying to provoke a reaction. The best thing to do is ignore her, and take the free publicity.
No, I get the phrase and the US has a similar meaning as in the UK. She will, and has, used the word to her own ends. While it is arguable that she seeks attention (and why shouldn't she since she is trying to call attention to a "great crime") I don't think the w appellation does anyone anyone credit. The politeness policy extends to everyone not just those of us on this board.
She's just another person pushing the existence of chemtrails. She'll attract attention. It's going to happen.
I'll say I don't care for what they are doing over there. It won't accomplish anything. I much appreciate the effort to remain civil here, even though I have my doubts about anything changing the direction in which the chemmies seem to be heading.
Erm, what does this mean? Do you mean the principles of politeness for effective communication extend to the rest of the world, or just that we should be polite here if we're talking about someone not-here?... The politeness policy extends to everyone not just those of us on this board.