Synchronicity - What's your experience of it?

deirdre said:
its good in old age to stretch your brain outside your comfort levels.

ponder on it a bit. :) add: you can ponder both really, but i meant ponder my waterfall comment and what i was responding to.
Click to expand...
I pondered it for a bit and decided my next best step is to find out what you're smoking, so I can buy some too ;)
 
deirdre said:
Don't give up so easily. You can get this. (although being stoned would likely help you immerse in the thought flow)
Click to expand...
Hopefully not double meaning (being stoned).

About the off-topic riddle: "I gave you a sense of beauty so you can appreciate what I have done"?

 
john.phil said:
Hopefully not double meaning (being stoned).

About the off-topic riddle: "I gave you a sense of beauty so you can appreciate what I have done"?
Click to expand...
lol to the first observation.

you got the beauty part right, (but without any God stuff). Beauty is something greater than the finite world. Jung may discuss such things as well... meaning what is beauty? why do we perceive beuaty? it's not tangible ie. part of the finite world. it's subjective like synchronicity. can comfort our souls etc.
 
Last edited:
Giddierone said:
Whatever this is about it has no place or value here.
Click to expand...
maybe you can be more clear then about how people are discussing your topic "wrong". people gave their examples. people bashed on it for pages stating in various ways that it is just coincidence.

so... what part of the topic do you want us discussing? why we psychologically find meaning in the things we find meaning in? How to design a study (even though a hundred years have passed and men in the field havent thought of a way to design a study).
 
deirdre said:
meaning what is beauty? why do we perceive beuaty?
Click to expand...
If not already aware of it, you might be interested to read about Wabi Sabi. It is not classical western beauty.

External Quote:
Characteristics of wabi-sabi aesthetics and principles include asymmetry, roughness, simplicity, economy, austerity, modesty, intimacy, and the appreciation of natural objects and the forces of nature.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wabi-sabi

GM4AJK said:
There are 8 billion people on Earth, and by that 1 in a million chance events occur to 8000 people every day.
Click to expand...
Regardless for how population numbers are sliced and diced is synchronicity actually a chance event. Isn't that what we are trying to flesh out. Out of the potential 8 Billion recipients for a synchronistic event how many will actually be 'in a state of mind' to perceive it as such if such a state is required in the first place.

Personally, I don't ever remember anything resembling a synchronistic event before my early teens, but I still remember some that followed later in life. Not suggesting there is meaning to any of that but my brain 'placed a weight' against it in memory once I was aware of the experience of such an event. Also, how many synchronistic events didn't even register as such? Why would they not stand out. Where 'conditions' not right.

I've been fairly neutral in my lack of understanding of this topic - I didn't feel the need to invoke a call to a higher power and preferred to stay in the realm of science/philosophy, but I do find hand waving this topic away as pure woo to be a lazy argument. But acknowledge it's a woo adjacent area that can get pretty out there pretty fast.

How the hell anyone could design a valid study into this is unclear. I often wonder if consciously waiting for a synchronistic event collapses the 'chance' of that happening.
 
Dave51c said:
Regardless for how population numbers are sliced and diced is synchronicity actually a chance event. Isn't that what we are trying to flesh out.
Click to expand...
Dave51c said:
How the hell anyone could design a valid study into this is unclear.
Click to expand...

The point I was trying to make is that we know that many coincidences do happen every day, and occasionally, remarkable coincidences happen:-

External Quote:
In 1992 Jason Pegler, was walking home from work in Dover when he heard a public phone ringing. He picked it up and was startled to hear the voice of a colleague, Sue Hamilton, apologising for disturbing him and asking for advice about how to work the office fax machine. He had great difficulty in persuading her of what had happened - until she looked down at her desk and realised that she had dialled his staff number by mistake. It just happened to be the number of the call box he just happened to be walking past.
The question then becomes, at what point does a simple coincidence turn into a memorable synchronicity event? That conversion (if it is a conversion and not actually a higher power signalling something) takes place in the mind of the observer. Indeed, how would one design/build a study to figure that out? I don't know, but it seems like a challenge to me.
 
One more example, that I had forgotten about: Years ago a friend once told me about the dream she had the night before, about getting an envelope with a black border, signifying a death announcement. She was not in the habit of telling me her dreams, but this troubled her greatly. A week later she got such an announcement when her father died in Germany, but, knowing it would be an expensive trip if she were to return for the funeral, they had waited until after the funeral to tell her. He had actually died on the night she had the dream.

I opined that it was a coincidence, and the dream was probably a result of her worrying about him due to his advanced age. She agreed (and seemed relieved to have a realistic explanation) but it had impressed her strongly since it was such a solemn occasion. I'm sure that most coincidences are quickly forgotten since they concern mundane events, but this seemed momentous to her because of the subject rather than the timing. This is exactly the kind of thing that suggestible people see as being "caused" in some way.
 
Ann K said:
One more example, that I had forgotten about: Years ago a friend once told me about the dream she had the night before, about getting an envelope with a black border, signifying a death announcement. She was not in the habit of telling me her dreams, but this troubled her greatly. A week later she got such an announcement when her father died in Germany, but, knowing it would be an expensive trip if she were to return for the funeral, they had waited until after the funeral to tell her. He had actually died on the night she had the dream.
Click to expand...
I think that might be [labeled] telepathy, not synchronicity. (or precognition if she dreamed it a bit before he died.. depends on time zones i guess)
 
Last edited:
GM4AJK said:
The question then becomes, at what point does a simple coincidence turn into a memorable synchronicity event? That conversion (if it is a conversion and not actually a higher power signalling something) takes place in the mind of the observer. Indeed, how would one design/build a study to figure that out? I don't know, but it seems like a challenge to me.
Click to expand...
that's why i mentioned that synchronicity happens all the time and doesn't need necessarily to be a memorable event. Jung is a psychiatrist. Ergo his descriptions are in the context of psychiatry (ie meaning).

It would be much easier to design a study (and way less subjective) if you look at it from the non psychiatric point of view. But it would rely on dedicated self reporters to gather data. A good example would be @Charlie Wiser 's experience. I think the way she is calculating her numbers is wrong.. but if she dedicated to keeping a diary and wrote down everytime it happened over say 3 months when taking notes and what specific words were synchronized, i think there's a chance researchers could agree on what math numbers to use to calculate the odds.

To be honest, over decades of hearing synchronicity stories.. her's is the cleanest example i ever heard of. It's an activity she does often. There's no subjectivity.. ie. either the words match or they don't.

It doesnt really match Jungs definition.. theres no "meaning" derived from the participant, and its not really an external event later matching an internal event...but it is something concrete that has a chance of gathering accurate data.
 
I was a cab driver in Boulder Colorado in the late 90's returning from a 2 am fare to Longmont and picked up a hitch hiker who was journeying to the places his birth parents haunted during their time together. He was going to look for a high school friend enrolled at the university but did not have an address. I took him to the house I was renting and put him up for the night, returned my cab to yard and cycled home. Next day, first fare was the guy my hitch hiker was looking for. I took him to my house, he collected his pal and I never saw them again.
 
deirdre said:
i didnt say it exists, im saying i dont think that would be an example of synchronicity, i think stories like that are categorized as telepathy.
Click to expand...
This is what I find so fascinating - how do we define the difference. Is it based only on time, e.g. separate events that synchronise within a short timebase (a thought of a phone call followed by the phone call within seconds) or a longer timebase such as a sense of loss for a family member followed days/weeks later of the news of the said passing (where there was no pre-knowledge of illness).

1/ Short timebase - we could argue is coincidence and if the impact on the psyche is high we might personally interpret as synchronistic.

2/ Long timebase - we might not initially think of it as coincidence, the emotional impact is likely high but the interpretation is telepathy.

Could it be argued that both are synchronistic events.

My use of the word timebase is coming from an internal model I'm using to try and visualise whatever this may be as the phase difference between short wavelength and long wavelength sinusoidal signals. One is 'quicker' to sync up than the other - for the same rate of change in phase. Yikes, am I suggesting consciousness has an underlying clock! :) And what is altering the phase shift! Oh, I think I need a cup of tea and a lie down!

I'm just spitballing folks - I know this can be a tough crowd here, go easy! :)
 
Dave51c said:
or a longer timebase such as a sense of loss for a family member followed days/weeks later of the news of the said passing (where there was no pre-knowledge of illness).
Click to expand...
i dont think when you learn about the event (ie weeks later) matter. in Annes example he died (the event happened) the same night as her friends dream.

i mean in trying to determine if "time" is a factor. i imagine synchronicity cant be a long time frame between events because the longer the time between the more the "odds" of the event happening are diluted. ?? I'll google it. :)

add: although the plum pudding story was a long timeframe.. and that was a pretty astounding coincidence. hhmmm...
 
Ann K said:
One more example, that I had forgotten about: Years ago a friend once told me about the dream she had the night before, about getting an envelope with a black border, signifying a death announcement. She was not in the habit of telling me her dreams, but this troubled her greatly. A week later she got such an announcement when her father died in Germany, but, knowing it would be an expensive trip if she were to return for the funeral, they had waited until after the funeral to tell her. He had actually died on the night she had the dream.

I opined that it was a coincidence, and the dream was probably a result of her worrying about him due to his advanced age. She agreed (and seemed relieved to have a realistic explanation) but it had impressed her strongly since it was such a solemn occasion. I'm sure that most coincidences are quickly forgotten since they concern mundane events, but this seemed momentous to her because of the subject rather than the timing. This is exactly the kind of thing that suggestible people see as being "caused" in some way.
Click to expand...
Very interesting example of a possible precognitive dream. I think there might be a connection between precognition and synchronicities, if they exist.
I didn't mention it before because technically it was a precognitive dream, but my mother had a very similar type of dream that she had when she was younger. She was attending a girls' school in Canyonville, Oregon (early '60s?) and she had a dream that a girl would come pounding on the school door in the rainy night who had been raped. The next night it happened.
Google AI brings up some interesting ideas if you prompt it with:
closed time loop synchronicity.
Sheldrake, anyone?
Precognition is spooky synchronicity at a distance? Eh? It's wafer thin…:p
 
Last edited:
Ann K said:
One of the basic problems is the "God gave this land to me" belief. That attitude makes it impossible for religious absolutists to reach any kind of compromise with others. Secular governments can avoid that pitfall (although they don't always do so), and sales and trades of property can succeed.
Click to expand...
Adding to my own post with an example that popped up today in my news feed. Mike Huckabee, long known as a deeply religious person, had this to say in a conversation with Tucker Carlson:

External Quote:

The US's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, has contended to the podcaster Tucker Carlson that Israel has a biblical right to take over the entire Middle East – or at least the lion's share of it. "It would be fine if they took it all," Huckabee said to Carlson during an interview posted on Friday. The Trump administration appointee and former Arkansas governor discussed with Carlson interpretations of Old Testament scripture within the US Christian nationalist movement.

Carlson asked Huckabee about a biblical verse in which God promises Abraham that his descendants will receive land "from the wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates." Carlson pointed out that this area in modern geography would include "like, basically the entire Middle East, the Levant, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon – it'd also be big parts of Saudi Arabia and Iraq," Carlson said.

He continued: "Israel is a land that God gave, through Abraham, to a people that he chose. It was a people, a place and a purpose."

Pressed by Carlson on whether Israel has the right to that land, Huckabee responded: "It would be fine if they took it all."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/20/mike-huckabee-israel-middle-east-tucker-carlson
 
Mendel said:
So because Putin is not religious, he failed to come up with reasons why Ukraine belongs to Russia. Gotcha. /s
Click to expand...
That's a sentence with many clauses, it's hard to know which one you're using for ironic purposes.

Because I missed the "Putin is not religious" memo. He repeatedly plays the religion card - he's explicitly accused Ukraine of being the enemy of Christianity, and Russia as the defender of it, and for me that's close enough, and I'd give most counter-arguments as much weight as I would the typical (free-)men-who-have-sex-with-men-but-aren't-gay arguments. But I'm a descriptivist - the "Christianity" that Putin represents is nothing to do with the mediterranean superstitions of yore, it mutated in september 1943 into what it is today. And if thou disagreeth, I demand that thou useth the original, and therefore correct, second person singular pronoun in any English-language response to me.
 
Last edited:
Todd Feinman said:
"the great invisible ape"
Click to expand...
That's not the most common imagery at all. Judeism doesn't ascribe primate-like traits to the forms of its celestial beings, it doesn't even guarantee the ability for humans to understand what they perceive about some of its entities, and other religions have chosen completely different branches of the (often mammalian) animal family tree to focus on, including some mix and match. I suspect the "visually like us humans" meme was a renaissance artistic thing. Even if they could "take human form", that doesn't make them intrinsically human-like, if anything such an exception proves the rule that they aren't.
 
FatPhil said:
That's not the most common imagery at all.
Click to expand...
umm...
Todd Feinman said:
"I'm a special ape, and I have a divine mandate from the great invisible ape that makes the universe go."
Click to expand...
we are all monkeys. we were created in God's image.

oh no! (i swear i never seen the word Bonobo before @NorCal Dave 's disturbign post :) )
1771721833563.png
 
deirdre said:
umm...

we are all monkeys. we were created in God's image.
Click to expand...
Read the whole verse. Does god have tits and a fanny, or a dick? One of them must be in his image, and the other can't be, because we're do display some sexual dimorphism - it can't be both. Unless it can, in which case neither sex is in that divine image.

And judeo-christianity is a minor religious family, only a minority of the probably 90 billion humans who've ever lived on earth have believed in it.

And which god - YHWH, or Elohim? Ooops, that verse was written before other gods were introduced into the Judeistic panoply, so that's not a difficult question to answer, but the correct answer doesn't resolve the confusion that evidently arises when the other god is added a few hundred years later.

Etc., etc.
 
FatPhil said:
Does god have tits and a fanny, or a dick?
Click to expand...
men have tits and fannies. but it would be Adam because of the whole male domination thing back then. Eve was made from adams rib, although "why" i have no idea. Apparently Adam was lonely and God couldnt make a woman from scratch. or it was just God's way of saying "Fine, here.. but she's from you not from me so i dont want to hear any complaints"
 
deirdre said:
Eve was made from adams rib, although "why" i have no idea.
Click to expand...
This is debated among scholars, as it's possibly a mistranslation from Greek into Latin. The Hebrew word is "side", but in Greek, the equivalent word means either "rib" or "side", and when it was translated into Latin, the word "rib" was chosen instead. The scholars who defend "rib" do so in part because it fits the context, whilst the other scholars defend that every other occurrence of this word in Hebrew, means "side", never "rib". From Jewish symbolism viewpoint, "side" fits better, in part meaning that women are men's other half, our complement.
 
FatPhil said:
That's not the most common imagery at all. Judeism doesn't ascribe primate-like traits to the forms of its celestial beings, it doesn't even guarantee the ability for humans to understand what they perceive about some of its entities, and other religions have chosen completely different branches of the (often mammalian) animal family tree to focus on, including some mix and match. I suspect the "visually like us humans" meme was a renaissance artistic thing. Even if they could "take human form", that doesn't make them intrinsically human-like, if anything such an exception proves the rule that they aren't.
Click to expand...
We don't want to believe we are apes, beasts. Anthropomorphic deities go way back, as we know. Primates.
But by great invisible ape, I just meant great invisible anthropomorphic deity, or ancestor worship, or both.
You want something to make you feel special, not another animal! You want to have a special relationship with it. You want it to forgive you. You want it to love you! You want it to be powerful. The biggest, that can beat up all the others. You want it to heal you when you are sick, and to even conquer death for you.
 
Last edited:
Ann K said:
You haven't? I thought the free-wheeling sexual habits of bonobos were one of the first things people learned about primates.
Click to expand...
I seem to remember it was the 90s when their popularity kicked off in the UK. This 1997 article would support it being mid-90s:
External Quote:
David Attenborough introduced the bonobo chimp, subject of last night's Wildlife on One (BBC1), as "one of the rarest and least-known of all the continent's creatures". As far as "rarest" goes, I think we can bow to his superior knowledge, but "least-known" is a bit more debatable, because bonobos are rapidly becoming a top-biller in the natural history world. Two years ago, Karen Bass, who made this film, produced a Natural World programme which included bonobos and, if my recollection is correct, the chimps also featured in Channel 4's recent series about animal sexuality.
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/television-review-5581036.html
 
deirdre said:
men have tits and fannies.
Click to expand...

@FatPhil's from a place where men don't have fannies; in British English "fanny" means the female genitals.
British people generally have bum bags not fanny packs, though most probably understand the term, just like other American English names for things -sneakers, gasoline, rutabaga and zucchini (I know, not originally American words), skillet, sidewalk etc. etc. are usually understood.


deirdre said:
i swear i never seen the word Bonobo before
Click to expand...
Used to be widely called "pygmy chimpanzees", though there's not much difference in size.
 
Last edited:
John J. said:
@FatPhil's from a place where men don't have fannies; in British English "fanny" means the female genitals.
Click to expand...

External Quote:
fanny(n.)

"buttocks," 1919, American English, from earlier British meaning "vulva" (1741, perhaps 1725 where "Fanny Fire" is given as a humorous name for a prostitute).
https://www.etymonline.com/word/fanny

This is better known than the existence of bonobos. However, that doesn't mean everyone knows it. Evidence ^^ up there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Polo786
What was it that I photographed...?
Replies
22
Views
2K
Trailspotter
Trailspotter
Montauk
Popular Mechanics piece: “Your Consciousness Can Jump Through Time”
Replies
7
Views
7K
FatPhil
FatPhil
Mick West
Drones reported over Île Longue submarine base, France
Replies
2
Views
554
Mick West
Mick West
flarkey
Melinda Messenger's large golden orbs [flares]
Replies
19
Views
2K
flarkey
flarkey
A
The 1933 Hugh Gray Loch Ness monster photo
3 4 5
Replies
189
Views
12K
JMartJr
JMartJr

Latest posts

Trending content

Back
Top