Steven Greenstreet's Report on "The Pentagon Ghostbusters"

[MonkeeSage]

There are apparently different versions of the attachment to Harry Reid's SAP request letter with different redactions of the preliminary Bigoted Access List for the proposed SAP.

In the document received by Greenwald via FOIA, all government employees are redacted below number 4, Robert T. Herbert, and all contractors are redacted.
View attachment 71296
https://documents2.theblackvault.co...090624_Reid_to_DEPSECDEF_ref_AAITP_in_SAP.pdf

In another version uploaded to wikipedia, originally released by George Knapp, all government employees are redacted below number 3, Daniel Inouye, except for 10, Luis Elizondo, and all contractors are redacted except for 3, Hal Puthoff.
View attachment 71297
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/ind...eid,_then_US_Senate_Majority_Leader,_2009.pdf

The one on wikipedia is stated to be from here: https://www.8newsnow.com/news/exclu...nts-related-to-pentagon-ufo-study/1324250087/

If the wikipedia version of the document is trustworthy, it shows there was some kind of connection between Elizondo and AAWSAP, but really doesn't tell us any more than that. We already knew he was somehow related to AAWSAP from his mentions in Skinwalkers at the Pentagon, where Stratton was bringing him to dinners and he was telling them about his alleged psychic abilities, and kept in touch with Stratton (page 63, PDF edition).

Further down the dinner table sat Luis Elizondo, who worked collaboratively with Axelrod and was at the office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USDI). Elizondo looked dapper with jet black hair and was considered a brilliant Special Agent and analyst with a lot of expertise on counterintelligence investigations. Little did anyone at that dinner table realize that nine years later Lue Elizondo would become a media star and a household name in global UAP investigations.

As he enjoyed his steak tartare, Elizondo regaled those around him with some war stories, including one hair-raising exploit about how his advanced intuition and remote viewing capabilities had saved his life and the life of his men while on a covert combat mission in war-torn Afghanistan. Lue was one of that rare breed, an astute, detail-oriented analyst with an open mind. After that dinner meeting and the briefing the following day, he kept in close touch with Jonathan Axelrod as the project progressed.

Steven Greenstreet also recently implied on a twitter space that he has seen a further unredacted version of the SAP request document that listed James Lacatski and Jay Stratton as names above Elizondo on the list, and he hopes to report on it soon. I am talking that as hearsay until he does actually report on it or release that version, but it fits what information we already have.

Taking the wikipedia version of the document as authentic, we at best have further confirmation of a connection between Elizondo and AAWSAP. What is does not provide is confirmation that Elizondo ever had any officially assigned duties with the actual DIA program AAWSAP, aka AATIP, or that it was ever actually a classified program.

Steven Greenstreet (@sgreenstreet) just released a new video report for New York Post that provides some new insight into others on this list and he has provided the full unredacted document.


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCYNvH_Y2So

Source: x.com/MiddleOfMayhem/status/1943347336278872149

 

[Tezcatlipoca]

Steven Greenstreet (@sgreenstreet) just released a new video report for New York Post that provides some new insight into others on this list and he has provided the full unredacted document.


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCYNvH_Y2So


View attachment 82347
Source: x.com/MiddleOfMayhem/status/1943347336278872149

Michael Greene there is of note. Much like a majority of the social network there, he has also worked with a plethora of small businesses that're competitors to the major contractors they harp about constantly. He also works with AIAAUAP.

Robert Herbert there is also a good example of how this stuff is able to have continuity and be covered up so well. The Robert Herbert of reference there was an aide to Harry Reid. Notably, Major General Robert Herbert. During the period of AAWSAP, he was a deputy commander for the Nevada NG. Basically a modern day Stubblebine.
https://www.dvidshub.net/news/406191/longtime-army-guard-aviator-advisor-promoted-major-general

Not much public info on Blackwelder or Ramsey.

 

[elvenwear]

Steven Greenstreet (@sgreenstreet) just released a new video report for New York Post that provides some new insight into others on this list and he has provided the full unredacted document.

Excellent post. It's great news someone is doing some good reporting on these people.

I was surprised Jessica Wyatt was doing the circuit now. That is interesting news.

 

[yoshy]

Steven Greenstreet (@sgreenstreet) just released a new video report for New York Post that provides some new insight into others on this list and he has provided the full unredacted document.


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCYNvH_Y2So

I think this video will need its own post or multiple. So much in there that's new (to me at least). Like Alex Diedritch having been much deeper in this than she ever mentioned, like being married to Michael Greene and recently speaking at a Bigfoot conference (?!?!?!?)

 

[Tezcatlipoca]

I think this video will need its own post or multiple. So much in there that's new (to me at least). Like Alex Diedritch having been much deeper in this than she ever mentioned, like being married to Michael Greene and recently speaking at a Bigfoot conference (?!?!?!?)

Most of the historical references are pretty well known already just not mentioned here on the site as much, don't think I've seen Greene refereced on here before but he's been covered elsewhere a lot. Flip example plenty of others and I have talked about the huge social network there and the dynamic he pointed out across a few threads.
The bits about Grusch and more recent materials are definitely new though, gives detail to things we had gaps of info on.

 

[yoshy]

Most of the historical references are pretty well known already just not mentioned here on the site as much, don't think I've seen Greene refereced on here before but he's been covered elsewhere a lot. Flip example plenty of others and I have talked about the huge social network there and the dynamic he pointed out across a few threads.
The bits about Grusch and more recent materials are definitely new though, gives detail to things we had gaps of info on.

True, the majority isn't new, but the stuff that is new is quite...I don't even know the right word...insane(?). I think my brain exploded a little with the revelations on Dietrich. She came off much more skeptical or even disinterested in the more paranormal/supernatural/ET side of the whole sighting event with Fravor in her interview with Mick, for example.

 

[John J.]

She came off much more skeptical or even disinterested in the more paranormal/supernatural/ET side of the whole sighting event with Fravor in her interview with Mick, for example.

She's bright enough to understand that Mick isn't going to be persuaded by the more outré claims made by her acquaintances, and he isn't going to be part of the audience that she and her friends are courting.

 

[jackfrostvc]

Here is a document I fund that seems to be from Jessica Wyatt, one of the people Greenstreet named.

It seems to have been written in the 2000's and is about better target systems . Whether that be drones, missiles, ground targets , submerged targets or emulated satellites etc

https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2006/targets/Wyatt.pdf

 

[John J.]

Here is a document I fund that seems to be from Jessica Wyatt, one of the people Greenstreet named.

It seems to have been written in the 2000's and is about better target systems . Whether that be drones, missiles, ground targets , submerged targets or emulated satellites etc

Yes, nothing obviously connected with UAP or esoteric subjects. Arguably an example of over-generous funding of defense bureaucrats; $5-7 million for summaries of other department's projects under the label "targets", all of which would have had their own specific purpose and procurement, evaluation, acceptance criteria.

 

[FatPhil]

Yes, nothing obviously connected with UAP or esoteric subjects. Arguably an example of over-generous funding of defense bureaucrats; $5-7 million for summaries of other department's projects under the label "targets", all of which would have had their own specific purpose and procurement, evaluation, acceptance criteria.

The best question I ever encountered during my decades as a developer was from a not-so-technical guy (from HR) who would occasionally have a chat with us about what we were working on. It was obviously a kind of test, not a mean-spirited one as he was genuinely interested in the actual tech we were working on, but it was to try and get us to explain ourselves clearly to actual humans: "what does it do?". As simple as that. However, if there was any jargon in your response, his follow-up question would be the icily poignant "but what does it do?". I think every single line in that powerpoint presentation would demand a "but what does it do?". And I'm guessing the true response to that question is "generate funding" for most of them.

 

[Mendel]

Here is a document I fund that seems to be from Jessica Wyatt, one of the people Greenstreet named.

It seems to have been written in the 2000's and is about better target systems . Whether that be drones, missiles, ground targets , submerged targets or emulated satellites etc

https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2006/targets/Wyatt.pdf

She's DIA, and seems a likely person to have been assigned to support AAWSAP, which had "weapon systems aquisition" in the name.

I don't remember who the contact on the Bigelow contract was, i.e. who Lacatski's administrative support was, but whoever it was, their name should be on this list.

 

[Tezcatlipoca]

Yes, nothing obviously connected with UAP or esoteric subjects. Arguably an example of over-generous funding of defense bureaucrats; $5-7 million for summaries of other department's projects under the label "targets", all of which would have had their own specific purpose and procurement, evaluation, acceptance criteria.

This is where I would make the tiny note, just because someone was in AAWSAP or part of the woo crew network, doesn't mean all their work is dumb or fluff. The powerpoint here isn't really a case of over-generous funding. It's a powerpoint reflecting future priorities at that time for DOT&E. Their staff directly advises the SECDEF on test & evaluation functions, helps develop DoD wide strategies, and provides policy level oversight for them. DOT&E would work above all those programs laying out DoD wide priorities for example and helping support projects which align with more critical priorities. DOT&E is also set up by congressional mandate and has to work directly with Congress on some subjects inherently. I believe outside a few of the SOF R&D functions DOT&E is the only one that inherently has to report to Congress also.

From themselves too - https://www.dote.osd.mil/About/About-DOT-E/