jaydeehess
Senior Member.
AE911T Signatories
2,316 "Architects & Engineers"
20,014 "Other Supporters"
So just under 11% of total members have some related training or expertise to be included in the " architects and engineers" in the membership of AE911T.
AE911T is a vastly non-engineering, non-architect organization.
Just under 90% of signatories have no training or education with which they can be included in the "architect and engineer" category.
Contrast with the ASCE with a total membership in 2007 of about 141,500 of which only about 20% haven't the qualifications for membership grade above "Affiliate".
https://books.google.ca/books?id=e39...ed=0CDMQ6AEwCQ
The CTBUH has almost 800,000 members. While I do not have the breakdown in terms of qualifications, and many if not most, do not have structures training, education or experience, it should be noted though that the organization's executive has gone on record as not supporting any 9/11 conspiracy theory.
So again I wonder what standing AE911T has to argue a technical challenge to any NIST report in court. Does the court even hear technical based arguments in appeals to FOIA requests?
2,316 "Architects & Engineers"
20,014 "Other Supporters"
So just under 11% of total members have some related training or expertise to be included in the " architects and engineers" in the membership of AE911T.
AE911T is a vastly non-engineering, non-architect organization.
Just under 90% of signatories have no training or education with which they can be included in the "architect and engineer" category.
Contrast with the ASCE with a total membership in 2007 of about 141,500 of which only about 20% haven't the qualifications for membership grade above "Affiliate".
https://books.google.ca/books?id=e39...ed=0CDMQ6AEwCQ
The CTBUH has almost 800,000 members. While I do not have the breakdown in terms of qualifications, and many if not most, do not have structures training, education or experience, it should be noted though that the organization's executive has gone on record as not supporting any 9/11 conspiracy theory.
So again I wonder what standing AE911T has to argue a technical challenge to any NIST report in court. Does the court even hear technical based arguments in appeals to FOIA requests?