Yes, we can safely say that if A2001 did not walk off, then any hypothesis that relies upon that walk-off is false.
Correct. If A2001 did not walk off, then the NIST hypothesis, which relies upon that walk-off, is false. You cannot claim that the NIST hypothesis is anything other than what they
said it is.
But the months of computer simulations that NIST did gave a result, which they shared with the world and put in their final report, in which A2001 did NOT walk off. So A2001 not walking off does not invalidate that result.
NIST did not put the simulation
in their final report, they released it at the same time
they stated in their final report that the collapse was triggered by the walk-off of A2001.
They also gave a narrative in which A2001 DID walk off. Why they did this is a puzzle,
That is
not a puzzle. They stated clearly and unequivocally that the walk-off of A2001 was the trigger that started the collapse. And they went into great detail as to how the floor beams pushed the A2001 girder off of its seat.
but it does not invalidate the simulation results,
Either the NIST narrative invalidates the simulation or the simulation invalidates the NIST walk-off hypothesis.
and it likely based on a different simulation that for some reason they did not have visualizations of.
Hogwash! There was no other simulation. You are making stuff up to justify your denial that the NIST hypothesis is based on the A2001 girder walk-off.
AE911 really really want everyone to think that the only possible way the building could collapse is from the walk-off.
AE911Truth has presented conclusive proof of controlled demolition. i.e. none of this happened.
But that's not what NIST's report shows.
It is what the NIST final report
says. The video is
not the NIST report. It accompanies the NIST report, The report is the 1000+ page written document.
It quite clearly shows a collapse without the walk-off.
Yes, the simulation shows the A2001 girder failing because it is sagging far more than it possibly could, That is fraudulent.
They don't show a collapse with the walk-off, but they do talk about one.
And therein lies the rub. Both cannot be true. Therefore, one is false. Take your pick but you can't have it both ways.
So, AE911's (and Hulsey's, and NIST's) focus on A2001 is not justified. Regardless of the walk-off, the building collapses.
Of course. Everyone, including NIST, has it wrong, but you have it right.
However, if you are right and NIST has it wrong, then their report is invalid.