ok-i consider myself to be what has commonly become known as a conspiracy theorist. a term that we have been labelled with not a title that i have self appointed. it is an inaccurate description in the sense that the acknowledgement of situations around us are based on theory when in fact they are simple observations. even the term conspiracy has lost its inclusion in this label as the activities that were once carried out behind closed doors are now, more and more frequently, happening in plain sight. indicators have led the inquisitive nature of many like minded people to see the outcome of conspiratorial planning years before it is finally acknowledge in the common arena of mainstream media.
i experience things that shouldnt be happening. things that are carried out with the protection of our various national leaders that are damn right criminal. ..but mention it before the fact, when you see it approaching in the distance, and you are crowned with a tin foil hat. tell people that you had told(warned)them about something many years before...well, its too late for some already.
still, i think debunking sites do the "conspiracy theorist" community a great injustice and i am certain that there are many who would agree that whilst we consider ourselves to be seekers of the truth we will at the same time view people calling themselves debunkers as protectors of a system.
you mention chemtrails and i havnt even looked at your chemtrail forums yet because i know it is another schoolboy battlefield. your(someone elses)'data" versus conflicting data presented in opposition. and around and round in circles we go. completely pointless.
my own experience is that from the perspective of an artist, of someone who paints the sky.
how can anyone pass doubt on MY own personal experience without entering my head, reading my memory and literally seeing what i have seen? ..but you have 'data' that says i am wrong..sure.
it is inadvertently the subject of chemtrails that brought me here to this site-well-from a post regarding aluminium resistant crops. anyway..
how can anyone possibly debunk something that i see with my own eyes? how do you do that? i first notice the presence of chemtrails in the mid 90's. it took a few weeks to sink in that these things that were vandalising the sky where becoming more and more frequent. i have always looked at the sky and i could point out a contrail anytime since i first saw one as a child, but these were something new and persistent.
i dont care what the science says because it is my own experience that one day they were not there and the next they were and a month later they were absolutely everywhere. so you can say that i, eh, duh, just never noticed them before, that i was blind to them, that i never looked up at the sky....but i would deny that any of that were true. next you can assess ones mental stability/condition/temperament etc...fine...all fine. ..and then you can choke me on data upon data mixed with data after data...
but it would never discourage my own experience, were it seeing a bus blown up by 'terrorists' or just looking up at what was once a blue sky.