Truman: "“I can assure you that flying saucers, given that they exist, are not constructed by ..."

Rroval

Member
I've stumbled across this quote when I was arguing with UFO fans:

“I can assure you that flying saucers, given that they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth.”
– President Harry S. Truman. April 4, 1950. White House Press Conference.

Can this quote be debunked?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Truman gave no press conference on April 4th 1950. The Earliest version of the quote I could find was 2004:

http://web.archive.org/web/20040404170420/http://www.presidentialufo.com/truman4.htm
But there don't seem to be any other verification of this.

Truman mentioned Flying Saucers only once in an official capacity July 10th 1947, joking.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=12698
 
Last edited:

RFMarine

Member
further proof, list of presidential news conferences, its not there, there was one on march 30 and one april 13 but none on the supposed date



Harry S. Truman March 2, 1950 The President's News Conference

Harry S. Truman March 9, 1950 The President's News Conference

Harry S. Truman March 30, 1950 The President's News Conference at Key West

Harry S. Truman April 13, 1950 The President's News Conference
Harry S. Truman April 27, 1950 The President's News Conference


http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/news_conferences.php?year=1950
 
Last edited:

DavidB66

Active Member
Even if he said it, the phrase 'given that they exist', might just mean 'if they exist', or 'assuming that they exist', not an admission that they do exist. It would be a slightly odd way of saying it, but some more recent Presidents have had much odder turns of speech.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
THE PRESIDENT. Only the explanations I have seen in the newspapers. Did you ever hear of the moon hoax ?
This is veering off-topic, but what "moon hoax" would he have been referring to in 1947? Nowadays that term usually means the idea that the manned moon landings were faked.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
This is veering off-topic, but what "moon hoax" would he have been referring to in 1947? Nowadays that term usually means the idea that the manned moon landings were faked.
He's talking about speculation in the newspapers that the UFOs might be from another planet, and that seems to remind him of a classic newspaper hoax about aliens on the moon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Moon_Hoax
Metabunk 2018-09-04 07-32-56.jpg
 
Even if he said it, the phrase 'given that they exist', might just mean 'if they exist', or 'assuming that they exist', not an admission that they do exist. It would be a slightly odd way of saying it, but some more recent Presidents have had much odder turns of speech.
Yep. That's the way I read it. “I can assure you that flying saucers, IF they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth.”

Makes sense to me when you read it that way.
 

Rory

Senior Member.
While it seems there's currently zero evidence to suggest that Truman said this, or anything resembling this, I have to disagree with the above interpretation of the word "given".

To me, "given that they exist" = "they exist".

I believe it's being used here as a preposition:

 
While it seems there's currently zero evidence to suggest that Truman said this, or anything resembling this, I have to disagree with the above interpretation of the word "given".

To me, "given that they exist" = "they exist".

I believe it's being used here as a preposition:

The last word there is assuming.

“I can assure you that flying saucers, ASSUMING they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth.”

assuming
əˈsjuːmɪŋ/
conjunction
  1. 1.
    used for the purpose of argument to indicate a premise on which a statement can be based.
    "assuming that the treaty is ratified, what is its relevance?"
So it's like saying:

“I can assure you that flying saucers, for aguments sake, lets say they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth.”

I'm still reading it as NOT admitting to anything, just telling people that IF you believe they exist, they're not made by us.
 

Rory

Senior Member.
The last word there is assuming. So it's like saying:

“I can assure you that flying saucers, for arguments sake, lets say they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth.”
It is like saying that, if you ignore all the other meanings of "given", and take only that meaning of "assuming".

Shall we agree to disagree? ;)
 
Last edited:

deirdre

Senior Member.
I can assure you that flying saucers, ASSUMING they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth.”
except Truman didn't say it during a conference April 1950. Which means a UFO believer wrote a fake quote. and a UFO believer means 'they exist'. Why would a UFO believer have Truman say "flying saucers, if they exist, blah blah", that doesn't help the UFO world at all. Even I know that flying saucers, if they exist, aren't constructed by any power on earth. What would be the point of having Truman say such a thing that everyone already knows?
 

DavidB66

Active Member
except Truman didn't say it during a conference April 1950. Which means a UFO believer wrote a fake quote. and a UFO believer means 'they exist'. Why would a UFO believer have Truman say "flying saucers, if they exist, blah blah", that doesn't help the UFO world at all. Even I know that flying saucers, if they exist, aren't constructed by any power on earth. What would be the point of having Truman say such a thing that everyone already knows?
In that time, early in the Cold War, were there not suspicions that the mysterious 'flying saucers' might be secret weapons built by the USA itself, the USSR, or some other earthly power? There were rumours that Nazi Germany had developed very advanced aircraft technology, work on which secretly continued after the War. According to this Wikipedia article, in early 1950, Giuseppe Belluzzo, an Italian scientist and a former Italian Minister of National Economy under the Mussolini regime, […] claimed that "types of flying discs were designed and studied in Germany and Italy as early as 1942". Belluzzo also expressed the opinion that "some great power is launching discs to study them". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_UFOs

The timing of this would fit in rather well with Truman's alleged comments. I can imagine that in the days of Cold War paranoia some people may have preferred to be told that flying saucers were the work of advanced extraterrestrial beings rather than the dreaded Russkies.

Of course this is not evidence that Truman said it, but it might explain why he did, if he did.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Belluzzo also expressed the opinion that "some great power is launching discs to study them".
more semantics.
I only link that because I am a debunker. It seems most newspapers reprinting the story cut the quote like your link does, https://web.archive.org/web/20090913022250/http://www.german-discs.net/builders/belluzzo.php

So yes, Truman reading that phraseology might have been responding to Belluzos claims, meaning the technology was impossible. ? I can see your point there. But if he did, it's hard to imagine newspapers wouldn't have covered his comments since this Belluzzo thing was somewhat a sensational news story according to the archive link.
 

DavidB66

Active Member
Isn't "the timing of Truman's alleged comments" some time around 2004?
OK, I should have said the alleged timing of Truman's alleged comments!

Did Truman make any such comments in April 1950? Nobody has yet produced any clear reference to them from before 2004, which is surprising if he did make them, as the subject is intensively, not to say obsessively, studied by many people. So Truman did make some well-attested comments on flying saucers or UFOs, but probably not these.

However, I don't think the case can quite be closed. The following web page by a UFO enthusiast should obviously be read with caution, but it does refer to a report in Time magazine on 17 April 1950 which (allegedly) states that "in April 1950 Truman sends word through his press secretary that he knows nothing about the saucers". This doesn't give the exact quote, but it would fit the timing, the means of communication, and the general drift of the alleged comments. Someone who has access to the magazine's online archive (which requires subscription) or a good American reference library would be able to check this claim.

The UFO web page I mentioned is here: http://www.presidentialufo.com/old_site/harrys.htm It appears to be from the same site as the link Mick West gave earlier, but unlike that one it cites a verifiable source.

Added: I can't access the Time report, but I have found this brief report in the Canberra Times (Australia) of 6 April 1950, which confirms that Truman's press secretary, Charles Ross, made some statement denying any knowledge about flying saucers. https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/2774308 And if the story reached as far as Australia, there must surely have been reports in the American press too. The New York Times would be an obvious place to search. Of course, none of these reports yet confirm the exact words of the quote at issue, but the last sentence of the Australian report (which unfortunately is not fully legible) does appear to say that "neither the President nor members of his staff knew anything of such mysterious objects, either [illegible] of this or any other country."

Further added: zooming in on the illegible words, and playing with the brightness, I think I can decipher them as "as a secret weapon". The word "weapon" is reasonably clear, which has probably biased me to read the preceding word as "secret". Other readers can make their own minds up. If I am right, the sentence would read: "neither the President nor members of his staff knew anything of such mysterious objects, either as secret weapons of this or any other country."
 
Last edited:

deirdre

Senior Member.
in April 1950 Truman sends word through his press secretary
1.a Press Secretary speaks to the press. Ergo, the press would have reported on it.
2. what does "knows nothing about the saucers" have to do with “I can assure you that flying saucers, given that they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth.” ? The second sentence is the exact opposite of the first.


Bottom line: Produce the quote in newspaper print or in private letters, OR the quote is debunked.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
According to this book c.2012 page 97, and quoting the French Space Program (CNES), a radio broadcast put out the idea on April 3 1950 that the UFOs were a secret US military project -which some UFOs probably were-

and then on April 4th Charles Ross, Truman's Press Secretary, put out a statement that the military had no such projects. Later a scientist stated that such technology wasn't humanly possible.

So maybe the radio host, Henry Taylor, said the OP quote. Or the quote was a conflation of the events in this book which does give source references back to a 1983 publication of the CNES.

ht1.PNG
crpage97.PNG
gg.PNG

kkp.PNG
 
Last edited:

Rory

Senior Member.
Zooming in on the illegible words, and playing with the brightness, I think I can decipher them as "as a secret weapon". The word "weapon" is reasonably clear, which has probably biased me to read the preceding word as "secret". Other readers can make their own minds up. If I am right, the sentence would read: "neither the President nor members of his staff knew anything of such mysterious objects, either as secret weapons of this or any other country."
That looks like the right sentence to me.

Good work Deirdre on digging out the Henry Taylor stuff.

Case closed? :)
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Good work Deirdre on digging out the Henry Taylor stuff.
I found this book online
upload_2018-9-10_12-37-9.png


if you open the doc and search for "Truman" you will see many newspaper articles from April 3rd- (I got to april 10 then stopped reading) Los angeles Times, Denver Post, NY Journal, NY Times etc .. they are text excerpts of bits of the articles, but nothing indicates Truman himself spoke at all April 4th or later, and no newspaper is quoting Charles Ross saying anything like the OP quote.

The book is called
an example of some in th ebook


Apparently all of Ross's transcripts are available at the Truman Library (box 12 and box 25 cover the time periods) but I'm not seeing them online.

https://www.trumanlibrary.org/hstpaper/ross.htm
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
The Earliest version of the quote I could find was 2004
I found one from 2001 but doesn't give a date or location
rickrichards.PNG
https://web.archive.org/web/20010409014456/http://www.rickrichards.com:80/UFO.htm



and then I found a book published in 2003 that claims
pp.PNG

somewhat interesting, this Twichell guy is described as a MUFON field investigator.

Your 2004 link at least investigated enough to see that Charles Ross and Truman were not in DC April 4th.

I also discovered (everyone here probably already knew) that during that specific time frame UFO talk in newspapers was mega-viral [http://sohp.us/collections/ufos-a-history/pdf/GROSS-1950-Apr-July.pdf] , so definitely if Truman, Ross, any gov guy or even the scientist who spoke said anything like “I can assure you that flying saucers, given that they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth.”; it would have been reported in the newspapers of the time.

maybe a red herring but I did find a somewhat similar turn of phrase from a May 23, 1955 article in the NY American Journal. I found no other near-misses using the term "constructed" or "on earth".
 

Scotts62

New Member
I have found the original source of the Truman statement “I can assure you that flying saucers, given that they exist, are not constructed by any power on earth." in the 1995 The Rockefeller UFO Briefing Document Page 100.
Metabunk 2019-06-16 05-50-53.jpg
You can download it here.
http://www.openminds.tv/wp-content/uploads/Rockefeller-Briefing-Document.pdf

via:
https://integralisme.wordpress.com/2015/08/06/the-rockefeller-ufo-briefing-document/

I have been unable to find the original notes from April 4, 1950, White House Press Conference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I have found the original source of the Truman statement
While this is an older source than the previous ones listed, it's not clear it's the original.

What does seem clear is that Truman did not give a press conference at the white house on that day.
 

Rory

Senior Member.
I have found the original source of the Truman statement in the 1995 The Rockefeller UFO Briefing Document
I wonder what the legitimacy of that document is: the quote after the Ford one is from Jimmy Carter, cited in The National Enquirer.

upload_2019-6-16_20-41-22.png
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West UFO Billboard in Montana Uses Photo of Identified Flying Object UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 4
Mick West Illusion of Contrail Asymmetry from Flying perpendicular to the Sun Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 0
Marine0811 Unknown flying insect or object Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 19
Mick West Sideways Flying UFO Hawk Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Mick West A Plane Flying Across the Face of the Sun, with Contrails [Virgin Flight 353] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Yolo fish Demonstrating the curvature of the Earth by Flying in a "Straight Line" Near the Poles Flat Earth 33
Mick West Explained: Exmouth UFO Flying Saucer - Sunlit Contrail and Motion Blur Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 70
Mick West Four Engines, Flying West over Sacramento Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 6
Trailspotter UFO with navigation lights, Drone or aircraft? [Low Flying FedEx 777] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 14
Provemewrong Explained: Why flying isn't impossible on a globe Flat Earth 106
Mick West Two Large Planes Flying Parallel, Chiloquin, OR. Is it Legal? Yes. Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Mick West Butterfly UFO - Things it Might Be, Like an EDF Flying Wing UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 17
Critical Thinker Debunked: Monsanto wants to replace the bees they are killing with genetically engineered flying ant General Discussion 5
Eyes_Open Debunked: Angels over Brazil [Hoax] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Joe 10 White "UFO" objects filmed flying over Japan UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 15
ĕrēmīta Low Flyer Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 16
Whitebeard Explained: Colorado Man Photographs Flying Jellyfish-Like ‘Critters’ [Water on Lens, Caustic Bokeh] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 17
StratMatt777 The Yellow Tailed DHL 747-8F that went over Redding is flying over WA Contrails and Chemtrails 5
Trailblazer Pair of jets flying in formation? [Two commercial flights] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 4
Mick West Explained: Flying Carpet Rhombus-shaped Cloud in Exeter Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 23
Josh Heuer MH17: Russia Claims Ukranian military plane flying nearby before incident Flight MH17 121
Gridlock Why was MH17 Flying Over The Conflict Region? Flight MH17 102
zebra100 Businessman Claims he Saw ‘White Plane Image’ Under Water while Flying from Melbourn Flight MH370 0
Dylmar Low flying plane leaving trails that don't come from the engines [Fuel dump, Continental flight 009] Contrails and Chemtrails 11
WeedWhacker MH370: Report of Jet flying over Maldives Island Kudahuvadhoo Flight MH370 86
Mick West Two planes in Germany flying Racetrack patterns together [Likely Eurofighter Typhoon Practicing] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 9
R Flying back and forth Contrails and Chemtrails 29
Fred259 WTC: Were the planes drones, how hard is flying a 767 into a building? 9/11 58
Charlie Primero Bush and Clinton Flying Cocaine into the U.S. Conspiracy Theories 0
Mick West Debunked: Holographic Circular Plane or Flying Saucer Leaving Chemtrails [Bokeh] Contrails and Chemtrails 11
Related Articles






























Related Articles

Top