Syria UAP 2021- Apparent Instantaneous Acceleration

[jdog]

Hah, I forgot I made this video talking about my balloon experiment.


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snwqUpQ6oSE

Missed an opportunity to say, "Upon reflection, I recalled I made this video..."

 

[Nemon]

This case is obviously this one now released with the second batch as

DOW-UAP-PR051

https://www.war.gov/UFO/#DOW-UAP-PR051-Syrian-UAP-instant-acceleration

I wonder how it's redacted now though it's been already published by Corbell unredacted.

 

[JMartJr]

Interesting how the clouds are flowing through the frame constantly from right to left, until right when the "UFO" zips out of frame, when they slow right down. Almost as if the camera is following the UFO, then stops doing that so the UFO exits the right of the screen.

This is all consistent with the object flying along at a constant rate of speed (or a constant apparent speed produced by a moving camera and parallax for an essentially stationary object like a balloon). There is no observable evidence of acceleration in either case, instantaneous or otherwise!

Yet somebody in DoD is releasing this as an object flying in an anomalous fashion. This raises some ominous and unavoidable questions about the competence of some number of folks at DoD -- hopefully the number is small, and limited to either folks who Want To Believe or who Want To Mollify Congressional Members Who Want To Believe.

 

[Mick West]

The segment in question

The video quality is quite a bit better than Corbell releases, you can actually see the interlacing artifacts, so it's much closer to the original, and you can see:

he clouds are flwoing through the frame constantly from right to left, until right when the "UFO" zips out of frame, when they slow right down. Almost as if the camera is following the UFO, then stops doing that so the UFO exits the right of the screen.

Which is also what the Sitrec analysis shows.

 

[Nemon]

The video quality is quite a bit better than Corbell releases

Do you think that this 'official' version has not been filmed off a monitor?

 

[Mick West]

Do you think that this 'official' version has not been filmed off a monitor?

I think it's the original footage, just reencoded, so not filmed off a monitor. The various contrast issues are problems with the original IR camera.