Synchronicity - What's your experience of it?

I immediately thought "Every Breath You Take" was cringe & creepy...
but I also realized that it superficially sounded enough like a standard love song,
that people would hilariously use it at their weddings...
With such a high divorce rate, you should be watching…
 
I had a number of bizarre synchronicities around my first UFO experience in 2010; those events must have been connected in a strange way, perhaps with external agency.
Once at my former job a staff member was going to make an obscure dessert for a staff meeting. She got sick and couldn't make it. A different staff member with no contact, made the same dessert she was going to make and brought it!
Many times staff members would show up with the same color of clothing; this happened so much it stopped being discussed.
Once, I saw a patron wearing an elaborate pirate costume for no reason, leave building. Weird! Then I got to looking up pirate's real name in Wikipedia as I had forgotten it. Was instantly approached by person across huge room to change their name after divorce, back to their maiden name; the unusual surname of the pirate!
 
Once at my former job a staff member was going to make an obscure dessert for a staff meeting. She got sick and couldn't make it. A different staff member with no contact, made the same dessert she was going to make and brought it!

At risk of being a bit of a killjoy: Two staff members at the same place, both willing to make a dessert for a meeting (I'm guessing this wasn't a job requirement?) So they probably live in the same general area and have some interest in home baking/ meal preparation. Maybe they watched the same cooking show on TV, or read the same online/ magazine article about a particular dessert, or noticed the same unusual dessert in a local restaurant or shop.
If they are both staff members of the same organisation at the same location (or maybe at different nearby locations) they might have had mutual friends (or at least contacts) with whom they sometimes discussed their cookery interests. The two cooks might have got inspiration from the same source, or the first (intended) cook might have discussed the dessert with someone who then mentioned that dessert, without reference to the first cook, to the second (this also works if the person who ended up providing the desert had mentioned that dessert first, and that dessert idea was mentioned by a mutual friend to the woman who was originally intending to provide it).
 
I have a brother and a sister named John and Kim. John's wife is also named Kim. John's wife Kim has a brother named John. John's wife Kim's brother John has a girlfriend named Kim.

No word on the names of my sister Kim's brother's wife's brother's girlfriend's siblings, but good chance there's a John in there.
Neighbors of ours had a son named Terry and a daughter named Kelly, while the couple across the road from them had a son named Kelly and a daughter named Terry. Army base, people moving in and out, so it wasn't prearranged in any way.
 
My son is James G III, my cousin once removed is Joseph B the 5th, a first cousin is Arthur M III while my brother is another Arthur. This is not synchronicity, we are just uncreative namers...
I knew a William W. the tenth, although I'm sure some of their mothers probably rolled their eyes and wanted to name the kid something else.
 
I immediately thought "Every Breath You Take" was cringe & creepy...
but I also realized that it superficially sounded enough like a standard love song,
that people would hilariously use it at their weddings...
I believe it was originally intended as such, the ambiguity being a part of the conceit.

It follows a 'standard' progression ['Stand by Me' etc.] but the real magic is in Summers' arpeggio. He was [is] of course, as good as the other two. It occurred to me that he plays guitar much like a pianist; what I mean of course is that he plays guitar like a musician.
 
When I came to this thread last night, I found it interesting. At #17 I said to myself, "How long will I have to wait until I see 666 again?"

Had my answer first thing this morning

1769069982134.png
 
Probably not synchronistic, but name related:

External Quote:
Nominative determinism is the hypothesis that people tend to gravitate toward areas of work or interest that fit their names. The term was first used in the magazine New Scientist in 1994, after the magazine's humorous "Feedback" column noted several scientific studies carried out by researchers with remarkably fitting surnames. These included a book on polar explorations by Daniel Snowman and an article on urology by researchers named Splatt and Weedon. These and other examples led to lighthearted speculation that some sort of psychological effect was at work.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative_determinism

When I used to read the printed magazine, some of the examples were funny. Online, New Scientist seems to be behind a paywall, but I did see this snippet - a pig researcher named Alex Hogg.
 
At risk of being a bit of a killjoy: Two staff members at the same place, both willing to make a dessert for a meeting (I'm guessing this wasn't a job requirement?) So they probably live in the same general area and have some interest in home baking/ meal preparation. Maybe they watched the same cooking show on TV, or read the same online/ magazine article about a particular dessert, or noticed the same unusual dessert in a local restaurant or shop.
If they are both staff members of the same organisation at the same location (or maybe at different nearby locations) they might have had mutual friends (or at least contacts) with whom they sometimes discussed their cookery interests. The two cooks might have got inspiration from the same source, or the first (intended) cook might have discussed the dessert with someone who then mentioned that dessert, without reference to the first cook, to the second (this also works if the person who ended up providing the desert had mentioned that dessert first, and that dessert idea was mentioned by a mutual friend to the woman who was originally intending to provide it).
Agreed. Generally, I'd add that coincidences and synchronicities are more likely to occur in information-rich environments; libraries, especially sorting tables (we used to manually sort books back in the day) are ideal environments for those kinds of connections to happen.
On a different note, divinatory methods, such as Tarot, the I Ching, and others, attempt to create complete systems containing information capable of being interpreted in particular ways depending upon the circumstances.
 
One unfortunate coincidence occurred some years ago. I had read about the "Suicide Machine" a service some time ago that would remove traces of your personal information online. I sent an email to staff in the morning including the lyrics from "Suicide Is Painless", only to find out a bit later that day that a very significant staff member's sibling had committed suicide the night before. I apologized to the person.
 
When I used to read the printed magazine, some of the examples were funny. Online, New Scientist seems to be behind a paywall, but I did see this snippet - a pig researcher named Alex Hogg.
A term I have seen for these kinds of names is "aptonym."

I was in a band with an ER doctor, and two of his colleagues at the hospital were named Dr. Gutman and Dr. Doctor. But my favorite medical-related aptonym was my old boss' hematologist, Dr. Pierce.
 
I was in a band with an ER doctor, and two of his colleagues at the hospital were named Dr. Gutman and Dr. Doctor. But my favorite medical-related aptonym was my old boss' hematologist, Dr. Pierce.
A GP at my local surgery when I was a kid was called Dr De'Ath.

They used to put the names of the doctors up on one of those black pegboards with white plastic letters that push into the little holes, and they apparently didn't have any apostrophes, or they had been stolen or dropped off and got vacuumed up.
 
When I came to this thread last night, I found it interesting. At #17 I said to myself, "How long will I have to wait until I see 666 again?"

Had my answer first thing this morning

View attachment 88046
Today, I've got a twofer...

This morning, when using an automatic checker to verify that the sudoku puzzle I'd just created had a unique solution, the bot's stats said that it made 666 guesses before finding the only solution. (The solver's dumb, no guessing is required, just judicious note-taking - play here: https://sudoku.coach/en/s/CWqE )

And this evening, at a beer tasting at a local brewpub, one of the beers was a limited edition barrel aged nonsense - only 666 cans produced!
(Probably a 500L batch with sizeable wastage at each stage, and they *definitely* don't know how many cans they'll get from the batch when they order the labels, so it's clearly a "40 days and 40 nights" kind of magic number.)
 
I read this post on X just now (red emphasis mine)

1769186264032.png


And the very next one X gave me, which wasn't anything to do with the first one), was:-

1769186319970.png


What are the odds?! :rolleyes:
 
Ok this is a good one. A couple of minutes ago I posted this photo of a contrail in a 1990s show in the pre-1995 contrail thread. I commented that there are screen reflections visible because I couldn't get screen capture to work with the streaming video on Netflix.

Immediately after posting, I saw a notification that there was a new thread, clicked on it and what was right there in the replies?

1769512600721.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Ok this is a good one. A couple of minutes ago I posted this photo of a contrail in a 1990s show in the pre-1995 contrail thread. I commented that there are screen reflections visible because I couldn't get screen capture to work with the streaming video on Netflix.

Immediately after posting, I saw a notification that there was a new thread, clicked on it and what was right there in the replies?

View attachment 88119
and i just mentioned you (in a good way) last night , in a response to Mick, referencing 'the old days' and you post in an old days thread :) not the most mindblowing example, but i like it.
 
I thought I had an amazing one for you... yesterday in San Juan, Puerto Rico, I spotted an older white-bearded somewhat heavy gentleman who looked a lot like Santa Clause, wearing an Hawaiian shirt with Santa all over it. A few minutes later, I saw a different Santa-looking jolly fellow ALSO in an Hawaiian shirt, with a DIFFERENT pattern of Santa-themed fabric. "Wow," sez I, "what are the chances of THAT?"
Moments later, it became obvious that a club or professional organization of Santas was vacationing together...

P1310728.JPG


...an odd thing, maybe, but only ONE odd thing and so not a coincidence
 
Ok, this is going to be a bit convoluted, but then so are most synchronicities. And just ever so slightly adult.

Our son introduced us to a somewhat confusing online word puzzle called Minute Cryptic back at Christmas and my wife, with some assistance from me, will try them in the evenings.

On Friday last, we didn't do the puzzle as we went to a performance with some friends. Afterwards, somehow the subject of swingers and open marriage came up while enjoying a nightcap. Our friends had other friends for whom that was a thing.

The following Saturday evening, the wife and I were enjoying a quiet cocktail at home and we were recapping the previous night's swinger discussion. Something like, "I guess as boring old married people for 37 years we're…well… boring". But it did remind me of a book called Sex Before Dawn that I brought up. The authors tried to make the argument that monogamy is a purely cultural construction and goes against our true human nature. I shared, that as evidence they cited the sexual proclivities of our close relatives the chimps and even more so the chimp's less well-known cousin, the Bonobo. Basically, Bonobo's are very polyamours and are constantly engaging in sex acts, thus making them very peaceful and conflict free. One can read it for themselves to see if any of these arguments hold up.

As we finished the discussion, my wife opened up the Minute Cryptic puzzle from Friday, as we had been out and didn't work on it. Normally hard and confusing to solve, it only took a few minutes to realize the answer was of course…Bonobo.

Not sure what the universe is trying to say here. :confused:
 
Not sure why this is but I seem to have a very good memory for pictures from a fleeting period in my life (childhood), such that If I see something that reminds me of them I can usually remember the exact page it was on. I particularly remember thinking how violent this illustration was at the time.

That said, I just saw someone post this AI image on Twitter.

1769712760300.png


Which immediately made me think of this from a Transformers annual from...1985...
1769712751024.png
 
So, I promise not to keep updating this post, because it's beyond tiresome at this point, but I've been stuck at home due to the winter storm. Some days ago, I picked this afternoon to venture out and replenish my essentials, leaving my property for the first time in 9 days (9 days ago also being when I wrote that post).

Who do you suppose began to plow his driveway just as I was exiting the front door?
:oops:
 
Thinking about posts 69, 70:

I get the impression many of us here have or had an interest in science fiction (books, TV shows, films, comics).
I wouldn't be surprised if SF is more popular among people with an interest in science / technology subjects.

Maybe people interested in science subjects have a better than average understanding of science, and are more aware of/ annoyed by pseudoscience and bunk (and a few of those exasperated souls end up here) :)

Robots (and cyborgs etc.) are common characters in SF, there must be lots of SF (and superhero) comics/ book and magazine covers/ film and TV scenes where someone is fighting a robot, or two robots/ cyborgs fight each other.
 
I get the impression many of us here have or had an interest in science fiction
Absolutely! I love good SF. It can be equally inspiring and frustrating at the same time. I learned how to suspend disbelief as I got older, but remember being deeply upset as a kid by a line in a Dr Who episode "I just need to reverse the polarity of the sonic screwdriver" in order to get him out of a sticky situation. My early meddling with electronics always resulted in destruction whenever I (accidentally, cough) reversed polarity! Earthling physics sucks!
:)
 
Hows this?!

This morning we got a rare snowfall here in Charlotte, and I snapped this pic to post on FaceBook, showing the falling snow and a bit of yard art.

P1310933.JPG



When I went to the site to post the pic, this suggested video was waiting for me...
delme.jpg


As far as I can tell, it doesn't have any deeper meaning, so I guess it is not synchronicity? But a heck of a coincidence!
 
As far as I can tell, it doesn't have any deeper meaning, so I guess it is not synchronicity?
it doesnt have to have "deeper meaning". If you notice it, it has meaning. ( i personally think alot of it is just God-or someone in heaven- saying hi or "cool yard art!")

edit add: to be fair, the way modern software tracks our every move anything digitial could just be the algorithm, not synchronicity. :)
 
Last edited:
Thus, Facebook was aware of your photo before you even logged on and found a corresponding Reel for you as soon as you showed up on Facebook.
It was not a phone pic, so it was not that.

I suppose it is possible that the computer read the SD card as I plugged it in, decided that the dinosaurs pic was of particular interest (whether or not it guessed I was there to post it) and fed me the dinosaur video... but My guess us that just a coincidence might be more likely, given that there are so very many chances for coincidence to crop up, all the time.

(I just realized I was sufficiently sidetracked by the strangeness that I never completed actually posting the post... guess I better go do that to avoid causing some sort of temporal paradox.)
 
And how many more times since this USB epiphany yesterday have you heard about those colours?


How many new things did you learn about between May 5th and July 10th that only occurred one time? Are these also in your diary?

I learn new things practically every day, as I read or watch so much.

But here's the thing. Yesterday I discovered the word 'exegesis' in a video on religion. I had to look up what it means. Just half an hour later I heard the word again in a completely different video. Whilst both videos were on religion, you could watch many many religion videos and never hear the word. And the other critical thing is that having heard the word twice in the space of half an hour, I could now easily go 10 years and not hear the word again.
 
I learn new things practically every day, as I read or watch so much.

But here's the thing. Yesterday I discovered the word 'exegesis' in a video on religion. I had to look up what it means. Just half an hour later I heard the word again in a completely different video. Whilst both videos were on religion, you could watch many many religion videos and never hear the word. And the other critical thing is that having heard the word twice in the space of half an hour, I could now easily go 10 years and not hear the word again.

Well, that's the exact point of my comment. Had you not heard it in the second video, then it would have just been one of those one-time things you just learnt. And by your own admission, one of many one-time things. It's you who added the significance when the second occurrence came along, not something strange or bizarre.
 
Back
Top