Signatures - Get rid of them?

[Mick West]

I find signature lines to be a bit of a distraction, and most posters don't use them. So, shall we get rid of them?

 

[FatPhil]

I find signature lines to be a bit of a distraction, and most posters don't use them. So, shall we get rid of them?

View attachment 91477

Everyone already has this choice as part of their settings, so I don't think there's a huge need to have it enforced as policy. As a disabler, my "no" vote definitely wasn't pro-sigs, merely pro-choice.

 

[RobertBillyBob]

Everyone already has this choice as part of their settings, so I don't think there's a huge need to have it enforced as policy. As a disabler, my "no" vote definitely wasn't pro-sigs, merely pro-choice.

This only works for logged users.

 

[Giddierone]

Everyone already has this choice as part of their settings, so I don't think there's a huge need to have it enforced as policy. As a disabler, my "no" vote definitely wasn't pro-sigs, merely pro-choice.

Forcefully shielding readers from the "forced benefit" of repeatedly reading some bit of pomposity would be a kindness.

 

[Smythe Bacchus]

Forcefully shielding readers from the "forced benefit" of repeatedly reading some bit of pomposity would be a kindness.

Then that would be a different poll against pompous signatures. I hope mine does not fall into that category?

 

[Todd Feinman]

Then that would be a different poll against pompous signatures. I hope mine does not fall into that category?

Aaawww. I like my skeptic-roasting propaganda! But alright…

 

[Smythe Bacchus]

This only works for logged users.

Signatures are also hidden to save screen space when using a mobile web browser