BlueCollarCritic
Member
The Title I wanted but did not have enough room for: Sandy Hook –How many Coincidences, Strange Behavior And Odd/Unexplainable Points Raised Does It Take To Make A Debunker Say “Something Is Not Right Here”?
Let me start by saying that I am not saying SH (Sandy Hook) was a hoax. What I am saying is that for a school shooting there are a lot of good points/questions raised about the incident. Even if they are all %100 debunkable you still have to ask what is it about SH that raises so many questions that previous school shootings did not?
For example there is the question about Robbie Parkers interview a few days after the shooting.
I admit this may have been explained and I just have not seen the explanation yet. While no one can truly say they “know” what a parent is feeling when they have lost a child to a tragic event those of us who are parents can derive somewhat of an idea of how a parent might feel. There is a video of Robbie Parker, father of Emilie Parker, doing an interview 2 days after the event, in which he can be easily seen changing his emtional state, drastically changing it by going from jovial like to what looks like the prepatory actions an actor takes before going into character and finally into an emotional state of sadness and sorrow, all within about 5-10 seconds.
Now all name calling aside I’d like to know how debunkers can explain away this odd behavior. And yes grieving people do strange things even swinging drastically from one stage of a mind to another in an attempt to deal with the tragedy however what’s not “normal” in that kind of emotional swing is to go thru motions/actions similar to what an actor does when going into character.
Hopefully Mick will have a chance to address this before the discussion slips into chaos from other posters just looking to name call and throw virtual dirt at the other side.
Thanks
Let me start by saying that I am not saying SH (Sandy Hook) was a hoax. What I am saying is that for a school shooting there are a lot of good points/questions raised about the incident. Even if they are all %100 debunkable you still have to ask what is it about SH that raises so many questions that previous school shootings did not?
For example there is the question about Robbie Parkers interview a few days after the shooting.
I admit this may have been explained and I just have not seen the explanation yet. While no one can truly say they “know” what a parent is feeling when they have lost a child to a tragic event those of us who are parents can derive somewhat of an idea of how a parent might feel. There is a video of Robbie Parker, father of Emilie Parker, doing an interview 2 days after the event, in which he can be easily seen changing his emtional state, drastically changing it by going from jovial like to what looks like the prepatory actions an actor takes before going into character and finally into an emotional state of sadness and sorrow, all within about 5-10 seconds.
Now all name calling aside I’d like to know how debunkers can explain away this odd behavior. And yes grieving people do strange things even swinging drastically from one stage of a mind to another in an attempt to deal with the tragedy however what’s not “normal” in that kind of emotional swing is to go thru motions/actions similar to what an actor does when going into character.
Hopefully Mick will have a chance to address this before the discussion slips into chaos from other posters just looking to name call and throw virtual dirt at the other side.
Thanks