Hopefully our group's most active members will get the blueprints and/or calculations, so we can see what the cause of this collapse actually was.
Hi Eleanore, and also welcome to the forum!
Who are the most active members of your group who you'd expect to do the bulk of the analysis? Last year, when the Plasco building collapsed in Tehran, the AE911 brochure to claim explosive demolition was put together in large part by Ted Walters, Craig McKee and Chris Sarns, none of whom has any relevant credentials whatsoever. One would have thought that a group that claims 2500+ members with degrees in engineering or architecture would be able to put a group of experienced engineers to the task.
I hope your group will look at the sudden onset, the high acceleration, the pyroclastic-like dust clouds, the reports of "explosions", the dust ejections, the falling straight down into foorprint, etc., to re-evaluate whether these features are indicative of controlled demolition rather than collapse from fire, as has been claimed by AE911T for so many years. What's your take on on these features?
Last edited by a moderator: