I think the visible evidence is against your case.
I'm sorry, but I feel people are intentionally ignoring all the facts. If you look here @ 20 seconds you can see the actual charges. This video shows all the angles which seem to be missing from here.
I'm sorry, but I feel it's only fair to show the truth. I assume posting a link to the video is o.k. since you did it. In this video you can clearly see charges going off. You can see them from different angles. Even the flashes. This was not caused by fire.
1. @Trailblazer has already demonstrated the first point that struck me: by the evidence of this video, the outbursts you are calling "charges" occur after the collapse has started. If so, cause and effect are reversed!
2. Compare the alleged explosion of charges with the undisputed demolition by charges in this video.I've chosen this example because I watched this demolition with my own eyes, and I lived in the left hand block for several years. So I know the structure well.
Notice the unmistakable noise of the explosions, a sound that is noticeably missing from your Plasco video. And I promise you that the video portrays the noise accurately.
3. Whenever we can see clearly in the Plasco video, it is clear that the outward bursts are always coming through windows. There is no evidence of the external structure being breached by explosions.
And the way the outbursts billow out looks exactly like the expulsion of clouds of air, dust and smoke from within, under the pressure of the collapsing structure, rather than a point explosion. You can confirm this using the times visible in these screenshots.
You can see this pressure effect expelling clouds in the Hackney demotion video, too, at 0.35-0.36, though here it's much neater, along well defined horizontal lines, because it actually is a controlled demolition, not a collapse due to fires.