That whole Isis and Osiris thing is interesting, as I've heard that people in the chemtrail community basically believe in that (as the deep background to the conspiracy).
Personally I don't see any real evidence for it, and it does not seem like there's going to be any one old mythology like that behind the working of the elite. The billionaires are a very varied bunch, with many different ideas. I suspect they would find such talk quite laughable.
I laughed it off when I first heard about it, I agree it sounds silly. I guess that is why generally people don't investigate it. That and the fact it is time consuming and requires some considerable effort.
I listened to Bill Cooper's "The hour of the time", Mystery Babylon and researched some stuff from there. It is interspersed with some liberal helpings of portents of blood and doom and 'wake up sheeple' etc but the facts are startling and compelling. It is to do with 'deep politics' and the origins thereof and how it affects the here and now because there are (and that is fact), powerful people who believe and practice it. I greatly respect Bill Cooper's work whilst recognising that some of what he said came from his own particular political and religious orientation. He was far from perfect but then who of us are?
The series can be downloaded from
http://www.ukginger.net/mystery-babylon.php
It is well worth listening to and investigating further. Even some parts I was quite sceptical about or which didn't originally make sense to me, after investigation proved to be well founded.
I take on board what you say about the diversity of many of the rich and powerful but we all know that 'the old school tie' or the 'old fraternity' carries weight. Its like a family, brothers and sisters and cousins and parents may all have different leanings or capabilities, likes and dislikes and may well vehemently disagree with each other but they are still tied to each other.
Just an e.g that comes to mind, sorry it won't mean much in the U.S but no doubt there are similar examples of 'groups' that 'go on together' that are more relevant there.
Source:
http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/tag/lord-mcalpine/
In the meantime, in what The Slog imagines is an entirely unrelated episode, we turn our attention to Ken Clarke QC MP’s wedding day as part of our new series
The Level Playing Fields of Britain. Here we see a gay band of young blades in November 1964 just before Suedophile Ken pledged his troth and went on to claim the glittering prizes. One is struck – is one not? – by the astonishing coincidence via which every last usher invited by Jazzophile Ken went on to equally great things later. Yes, be it stuffing mad cow disease down their kids’ necks or selling out to Brussels, every one of these chaps became a shining light. They began by being awful pretty, and gradually they became pretty awful. Such is life.
{QUOTE}
Its like the knights of old being chivalrous. Undoubtedly they were... to each other but that chivalry did not extend to the peasants. It was a 'self protection code' much like an early Geneva convention but only applying to them and their families not to the riff raff.
http://library.thinkquest.org/10949/fief/medknight.html
[SIZE=+1]
The code of chivalry demanded that a knight give mercy to a vanquished enemy. However, the very fact that knights were trained as men of war belied this code. Even though they came from rich families, many knights were not their families' firstborn. They did not receive an inheritance. Thus they were little more than mercenaries. They plundered villages or cities that they captured, often defiling and destroying churches and other property. Also the code of chivalry did not extend to the peasants. The "weak" was widely interpreted as "noble women and children". They were often brutal to common folk. They could sometimes even rape young peasant women without fear of reprisal, all because they were part of the upper class.[/SIZE]
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Limoges
When the city wall fell, Froissart mentions the massacre of three thousand inhabitants, men, women and children
Froissart's account is sometimes challenged as French bias.
[4] Author Jim Bradbury does not dispute Froissart's account but simply states that Limoges was "not an exceptional atrocity."
I am quite surprised to see the 'Bohemian Grove' subject hasn't been addressed on this forum or the assertion that the Roman Empire didn't really collapse, it merely transformed itself into the Roman Catholic Church. All interesting stuff and all highly relevant to today.
“If you don't know history, then you don't know anything. You are a leaf that doesn't know it is part of a tree. ”
―
Michael Crichton
