in response to my attempt at a metaphor, george said 'well what if i can force you to put wrong numbers in, erase others, etc...' saying the rules of the game would be forcibly changed and broken. well, to extend that thought to the collection of data on chemtrails, he seems to be saying that science cannot be used to make any observations. but science works on replicable laws of the universe, so if science is no longer usable, then the laws of the universe must be being changed. however, he was probably only saying that data would be corrupted, falsified, covered-up. the hyperbole was my own, and yes, i was starting to mix metaphors. i'm not the cleanest thinker around, but i do try to learn.
arithmetic was in the original sudoku metaphor as an example of how one gets to a valid result. one's standards have to be high and one cannot enter guesses. the standards for coming to valid conclusions about reality should be the same. speculation is cool, but has to be followed through and tested to see if it fails (falsifiability?).
it seems this part of things is being left out of the chemtrail story, an advocate will blur their vision just enough to not see the things proven against any particular fact in their case.
if chemtrails are being sprayed, organised, choreographed, budgeted, man-powered, etc, they will have very real effects in this universe. those effects can be observed. that's what 'so what'.
unless the instigators are using a time machine, or an alternate universe device, or have matrix-like inducing technology to get rid of that cause-effect relationship. like they're just lifting up a corner of the universe and sweeping the evidence under it.