Rocky
Active Member
So could this headline be any more misleading? Not sure if Mick West has seen this yet as it's only 6 hours old. Straight from MSN looking for clicks. I watched the thorough analysis Mick posted recently regarding the "Gimbal" video and I thought at the time "I bet someone will take something out of context in this video" and I was right. This also reminds me of interviews I have watched or listened of different scientists that go on some of these History and Science channel shows where they have complained about their comments being edited in such a way to make it seem as though they agree with the fringe. But hey, they got paid and the networks can do what they want. So here is the article posted by MSN with a misleading headline of Mick Wests analysis...
Famous Navy UFO video is camera glare hiding something 'really interesting', researcher says
Famous Navy UFO video is camera glare hiding something 'really interesting', researcher says
External Quote:Although the object appears to defy aerodynamics in the way that it travels, Mr West argues that what we are seeing is in fact a glare hiding a different object. That object is still unknown, he says, and could be "really interesting"