Tunnelvisionary
Member
http://www.newscientist.com/article...rrational-and-irresponsible.html#.VNuimS4vz3Q
Thought this article would be an interesting read. One can deduce from the article that obviously nothing has been going on, it has been a bunch of scientists discussing and researching the feasability of the act. Another article on this same issue I read yesterday stated that calling it "geoengineering" implies a precision in changing the climate that is simply not in our ability right now.
http://gizmodo.com/scientists-confirm-hacking-the-weather-to-cool-the-plan-1684985070
Another interesting bit from the original link was an estimate amount/cost of sulphur dioxide needed to perform a sort of global dimming to cool the Earth.
A believer could interpret this as them winning and slowly changing the mind of the public, but I suppose you could also argue these articles are designed to fool the public that geoengineering isn't happening so "nothing to see here" while the worlds government is spraying the skies. A chemtrailers work is never over
Thought this article would be an interesting read. One can deduce from the article that obviously nothing has been going on, it has been a bunch of scientists discussing and researching the feasability of the act. Another article on this same issue I read yesterday stated that calling it "geoengineering" implies a precision in changing the climate that is simply not in our ability right now.
http://gizmodo.com/scientists-confirm-hacking-the-weather-to-cool-the-plan-1684985070
Another interesting bit from the original link was an estimate amount/cost of sulphur dioxide needed to perform a sort of global dimming to cool the Earth.
A believer could interpret this as them winning and slowly changing the mind of the public, but I suppose you could also argue these articles are designed to fool the public that geoengineering isn't happening so "nothing to see here" while the worlds government is spraying the skies. A chemtrailers work is never over