It's already happening, estimating the bank angle from the artificial horizon is better than assuming 3 degrees. But it's all lost in the noise.I was rather expecting Chris Lehto to come back saying: 'Aha, but you can't trust the banking angle shown on the screen. Any expert pilot knows that isn't reliable. ' I don't think he has (yet), but be prepared!
The UFO enthusiasts increasingly remind me of the flat-earthers. If you refute one claim, then without blushing they come up with some ad hoc excuse. If you're not careful you'll be knocked over by the rapidly moving goalposts.
We are already at the point where we have videos from guys like sim pilot Alpha Check about the complete infallibility of US military systems, and videos from ex F16 pilots telling us the same systems present inaccurate numbers.
We also now have two UFO theory proponents telling us 2 different things about the same on screen number, TTSA and Chris Lehto.
I'm sure at the time of the TTSA release if we had questioned the RNG figure on Go Fast we would have been told "the systems don't make mistakes," now the same people are saying oh that figure, the one that basically says it's not low/fast, that's now wrong.
Chris Lehto, pilot says the videos are odd, all over UFO Twitter/Reddit, CW Lemoine says they don't show anything unusual, ignored.