Explained: Why flying isn't impossible on a globe

Status
Not open for further replies.
The earths curve is approximately 8 inches per mile squared. With planes flying at 500mph, the earth would curve beneath them around 31.5 miles every hour. In order for the plane to keep up with the curvature and not steadily head towards space, the plane would have to descend 2777 feet per minute or 46 feet per second!
Since there's at least one pilot here this should be an easy one to solve.
 

Spectrar Ghost

Senior Member.
Plane altitude is determined by hydrostatic forces; lift versus weight. Increasing altitude puts the plane out of equilibrium, causing it to descend. No active control is necessary.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
So the plane actually does descend by a rate of at least 46 feet per second?
What do you mean by "descend"? Altitude is measured relative to sea level, or, if you prefer, lines of equal gravitational potential.

If you maintain the same altitude and move around a globe, then your path will describe a curve, following the curve of the Earth. If you followed a "straight line" as the Earth curved away underneath you then your altitude would be getting greater and you would have to supply additional energy to overcome gravity.


Why even bring planes into it? By your logic, if you drove a car along a straight road, then after one mile your car would be 8 inches off the asphalt, and after two miles it would be 32 inches, almost three feet up in the air! Why should gravity affect planes differently?
 
Last edited:
What do you mean by "descend"? Altitude is measured relative to sea level, or, if you prefer, lines of equal gravitational potential.

If you maintain the same altitude and move around a globe, then your path will describe a curve, following the curve of the Earth. If you followed a "straight line" as the Earth curved away underneath you then your altitude would be getting greater and you would have to supply additional energy to overcome gravity.


Why even bring planes into it? By your logic, if you drove a car along a straight road, then after one mile your car would be 8 inches off the asphalt, and after two miles it would be 32 inches, almost three feet up in the air! Why should gravity affect planes differently?
... Cars drive on the earths surface, planes are in the air. I'll reword the question. Does the plane fly towards the surface of the earth at 46 ft per second while maintaining altitude?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
... Cars drive on the earths surface, planes are in the air. I'll reword the question. Does the plane fly towards the surface of the earth at 46 ft per second while maintaining altitude?
No, it stays the same distance from the surface, which curves slightly.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
... Cars drive on the earths surface, planes are in the air. I'll reword the question. Does the plane fly towards the surface of the earth at 46 ft per second while maintaining altitude?
No, the plane maintains the same distance from the centre of the Earth (and therefore the surface, ignoring mountains, hills etc), so it "falls" at the same rate as the surface does.

The Earth's surface "falls away" (compared to a straight line). If your car falls away with it, then why wouldn't a plane? Maintaining level flight means maintaining the same gravitational potential. A gravitationally level surface on a round planet describes a curve.

In your view, what is holding the car down and making it follow the Earth's surface?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Sorry I'm just having a hard time wrapping my head around it. How does the plane stay the same distance from the surface which is curving away at 46 feet per second?
You can't measure curvature like that.

In one second, a plane traveling at 500mph travels 0.139 miles, (500/60/60)

The "drop" over 0.139 miles is just 0.15 inches.

The curvature is vastly less than the gentlest curve of a freeway.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Sorry I'm just having a hard time wrapping my head around it. How does the plane stay the same distance from the surface which is curving away at 46 feet per second?
Because it is in level flight. If the lift from the wings exactly balances the pull of gravity, then the plane will maintain a constant altitude above the Earth (ie, a constant height above sea level).

Edit: and, as Mick says, you can't measure the drop that way. You are trying to measure the drop relative to a stationary starting point, with the plane disappearing off over the curve. Following that logic, by the time the plane was a quarter of the way round the world, it would be heading vertically downwards!
 
You can't measure curvature like that.

In one second, a plane traveling at 500mph travels 0.139 miles, (500/60/60)

The "drop" over 0.139 miles is just 0.15 inches.

The curvature is vastly less than the gentlest curve of a freeway.
I see. Thanks for the quick replies!
 
You can't measure curvature like that.

In one second, a plane traveling at 500mph travels 0.139 miles, (500/60/60)

The "drop" over 0.139 miles is just 0.15 inches.

The curvature is vastly less than the gentlest curve of a freeway.
Just to play devils advocate....
You can't measure the curvature that way either, or there would never be enough to make a sphere. So let's make a more realistic scenario.
Airport A and B are 1500 miles apart. 1500 miles has about 1.5 million feet of curvature.
To make this easier we'll say the plane leaves point A at its full and constant speed of 500 mph, already at cruising altitude of 35,000ft.
At 500mph hour this trip would take 3hrs, equaling 500,000 ft of curvature every hour.
/60=8333.33 ever min
/60=138 feet per second.
The plane obviously doesn't adjust 138 feet per second so my question is ......
Where does the curvature go?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Just to play devils advocate....
You can't measure the curvature that way either, or there would never be enough to make a sphere. So let's make a more realistic scenario.
Airport A and B are 1500 miles apart. 1500 miles has about 1.5 million feet of curvature.
To make this easier we'll say the plane leaves point A at its full and constant speed of 500 mph, already at cruising altitude of 35,000ft.
At 500mph hour this trip would take 3hrs, equaling 500,000 ft of curvature every hour.
/60=8333.33 ever min
/60=138 feet per second.
The plane obviously doesn't adjust 138 feet per second so my question is ......
Where does the curvature go?
Try drawing a scale diagram of this situation.
 

Z.W. Wolf

Senior Member.
The distance between the two airports is 1,500 miles along a curved line.

Instead of telling you things, maybe it's best to ask you some things. When you drop a bomb from a plane does it drop straight down? If you were the bombardier would you release the bomb when the plane was directly over the target? Or would you release the bomb before your plane was over the target?

This is germane to your problem.

To start, we have to think about:
1. Kinetic energy
2. Potential energy
3. Gravity
4. Gravitational potential energy (Important!)
5. Inertia

Something else to chew on. In this idealized (2 dimensional) problem, we should treat the horizontal and vertical motions independently.

What path would the dropped bomb follow? What shape would that path take? And - to quote the wonderful Dr. Julius Sumner Miller - "Why is it so?"
 
Last edited:
The distance between the two airports is 1,500 miles along a curved line.

Instead of telling you things, maybe it's best to ask you some things. When you drop a bomb from a plane does it drop straight down? If you were the bombardier would you release the bomb when the plane was directly over the target? Or would you release the bomb before your plane was over the target?

This is germane to your problem.

To start, we have to think about:
1. Kinetic energy
2. Potential energy
3. Gravity
4. Gravitational potential energy (Important!)
5. Inertia

Something else to chew on. In this idealized (2 dimensional) problem, we should treat the horizontal and vertical motions independently.

What path would the dropped bomb follow? What shape would that path take? And - to quote the wonderful Dr. Julius Sumner Miller - "Why is it so?"
To simplify it, are you saying the difference in curvature is partially due to the difference between point a and b being measured on a curved line vs a straight one?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Again, draw a scale diagram. It will make things much clearer for you.

Imagine driving down a road that just curves a little to the left. A VERY little. So little that if it were on a flat plane, and the road curved around until it joined itself, it would be 24,000 miles long.

What would that road look like to the driver?
 

Henk001

Senior Member.
The plane doesn't have to adjust anything, because EVERYTHING is curved -- not just the Earth's surface, but also the directions! "Up/down";"straight ahead";"water level". All these directions are locally defined by Earth's gravity, which always points towards the centre of the Earth/perpendicular to the surface.
upload_2016-9-30_7-40-41.png
 
The plane doesn't have to adjust anything, because EVERYTHING is curved -- not just the Earth's surface, but also the directions! "Up/down";"straight ahead";"water level". All these directions are locally defined by Earth's gravity, which always points towards the centre of the Earth/perpendicular to the surface.
View attachment 21722
Actually I've heard pilots DO have to make adjustments, or a computer does it automatically in relation to the VSI (vertical speed indicator). Hoping for some input from TWCobra seeing as he's a pilot.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Actually I've heard pilots DO have to make adjustments, or a computer does it automatically in relation to the VSI (vertical speed indicator). Hoping for some input from TWCobra seeing as he's a pilot.
Pilots (or autopilots) do make adjustments to altitude, but that is nothing to do with the curvature of the Earth. If you want to maintain level flight (a constant altitude), then you might have to adjust up or down to account for wind etc, or the aircraft trim not being set perfectly. You'd have to do the same whether the Earth was flat or curved, just like you have to make little corrections of the steering wheel even when driving along a straight road. It's not the case, as you seem to assume, that without corrections the plane would go flying off at a tangent from the Earth. Doing that would actually mean ascending at an increasingly steep angle (again, draw a diagram).

It seems to be a common misconception that curvature means the altitude somehow changes over distance. It doesn't. EVERYTHING is curved. "Level" is always at right angles to "down". You don't have to adjust for the curvature any more than you have to remember to turn yourself upside down before getting off the plane in Australia.
 

NoParty

Senior Member.
Actually I've heard pilots DO have to make adjustments, or a computer does it automatically...
That's an interesting thing to hear, in that something that a plane does automatically, in the background, seems quite different than a manual task that pilot would be forced to constantly perform.

Can you share the source where you heard this?
 
Pilots (or autopilots) do make adjustments to altitude, but that is nothing to do with the curvature of the Earth. If you want to maintain level flight (a constant altitude), then you might have to adjust up or down to account for wind etc, or the aircraft trim not being set perfectly. You'd have to do the same whether the Earth was flat or curved, just like you have to make little corrections of the steering wheel even when driving along a straight road. It's not the case, as you seem to assume, that without corrections the plane would go flying off at a tangent from the Earth. Doing that would actually mean ascending at an increasingly steep angle (again, draw a diagram).

It seems to be a common misconception that curvature means the altitude somehow changes over distance. It doesn't. EVERYTHING is curved. "Level" is always at right angles to "down". You don't have to adjust for the curvature any more than you have to remember to turn yourself upside down before getting off the plane in Australia.
I disagree with no adjustments needed. In Mick's example of the car, the wheel would have to be turned slightly to the left for the duration of the ride. Same thing should apply in any direction.
 

mm1145

Member
Actually I've heard pilots DO have to make adjustments, or a computer does it automatically in relation to the VSI (vertical speed indicator). Hoping for some input from TWCobra seeing as he's a pilot.
no the "adjustments" are made by gravity and because the instruments point to the centre of gravity (not at 90 degrees to a straight line) you fly a level curve
 
no the "adjustments" are made by gravity and because the instruments point to the centre of gravity (not at 90 degrees to a straight line) you fly a level curve
Lol a level curve! Level and constant curvature in relation to the ground to maintain altitude correct?
 

mm1145

Member
I disagree with no adjustments needed. In Mick's example of the car, the wheel would have to be turned slightly to the left for the duration of the ride. Same thing should apply in any direction.
ok if I asume you are thinking about a car driving in a cricle?

imagine if yo had a rope tieing you to a pole in the centre that rope keeps you going in a circle. but it is more than that because the rope dose not only effect the car but also all the things in the car at the same time.

I relay recommend playing kerbial space program for a bit if you want to really get a visualisation of how orbits (witch are all that level flying on a globe is) works because it is a realy visual/experimental learning and you can really get a feel for how you have to adjust some ways of thinking to account for a scale the human brain is not used to
 

mm1145

Member
Lol a level curve! Level and constant curvature in relation to the ground to maintain altitude correct?
yes you fall to the ground at the same speed as the ground falls away so you stay the same distance form it I will try to draw some diagrams later
 

jonnyH

Senior Member.
I disagree with no adjustments needed. In Mick's example of the car, the wheel would have to be turned slightly to the left for the duration of the ride. Same thing should apply in any direction.
Imagine the road has a slight incline towards the centre of the circle, do you still have to turn the wheel?
 
Thank you!

The source you cite begins with:
"A plane will fly at a constant altitude and will follow the curvature of the earth and would not gain altitude during a level flight."

Is that, in fact, the position you have been trying to argue for?
Yes it is! I guess I'm trying to understand the concept of a level curve.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Yes it is! I guess I'm trying to understand the concept of a level curve.
The difference between "level" and "flat" is not an intuitive one. The plane flies level, but does not fly flat.

Think of a spirit level. If I hold a spirit level up in the air here in England so the bubble is centred, and someone in California, roughly a quarter of the way round the Earth, does the same, the two levels are at an angle to each other, right? But they are both level.

Now imagine a long line of spirit levels, placed end to end in the air, stretching from England to California. The plane will follow that line.
 
Last edited:
The difference between "level" and "flat" is not an intuitive one. The plane flies level, but does not fly flat.

Think of a spirit level. If I hold a spirit level up in the air here in England so the bubble is centred, and someone in California, roughly a quarter of the way round the Earth, does the same, the two levels are at an angle to each other, right? But they are both level.

Now imagine a long line of spirit levels, places end to end in the air, stretching from England to California. The plane will follow that line.
And THAT is a great description. Thanks a lot guys.
 

tadaaa

Senior Member
sI think the good analogy is a person walking around a pole whilst attached to the pole by a fixed/rigid link

so the question is "does the person have to walk in a circle" (if it help imagine they are blind folded)

the answer surely is "no" he/she walks in a "straight" line

the fixed link is acting the same as gravity

flat.png
 

NoParty

Senior Member.
The difference between "level" and "flat" is not an intuitive one. The plane flies level, but does not fly flat.

Think of a spirit level. If I hold a spirit level up in the air here in England so the bubble is centred, and someone in California, roughly a quarter of the way round the Earth, does the same, the two levels are at an angle to each other, right? But they are both level.

Now imagine a long line of spirit levels, places end to end in the air, stretching from England to California. The plane will follow that line.
That's an interesting visual, Trail. thanks.
I also learned that y'all call a bubble level a "spirit level." Thanks for that, too.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I disagree with no adjustments needed. In Mick's example of the car, the wheel would have to be turned slightly to the left for the duration of the ride. Same thing should apply in any direction.
The road example is to mentally illustrate just how LITTLE you need to turn the wheel. It's a thought experiment taking the great circle that a plane follows, putting it sideways (on an imaginary flat plane with gravity), and then driving a car around it.

Have you ever driven along a perfectly straight road without moving the steering wheel for a few minutes? Not a good idea.

Those normal corrections you'd have to do to simply keep a car going in a straight line would be vastly more than tiny tiny correction to keep it on the curve.
 
sI think the good analogy is a person walking around a pole whilst attached to the pole by a fixed/rigid link

so the question is "does the person have to walk in a circle" (if it help imagine they are blind folded)

the answer surely is "no" he/she walks in a "straight" line

the fixed link is acting the same as gravity

View attachment 21723
There are a few problems with this.
Let's say you can take 3 steps straight forward before reaching the end of the rope. After taking those 3 steps, what do you have to do to continue your way around the circle?
Also a plane flying at 35,000 feet still has plenty "rope" left to go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Explained: Exmouth UFO Flying Saucer - Sunlit Contrail and Motion Blur Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 70
Whitebeard Explained: Colorado Man Photographs Flying Jellyfish-Like ‘Critters’ [Water on Lens, Caustic Bokeh] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 17
Mick West Explained: Flying Carpet Rhombus-shaped Cloud in Exeter Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 23
Mick West Explained: New Navy UFO Videos UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 77
Cassi O Polaris Height Perspective Explained (No math required) Flat Earth 1
Mick West Explained: RARE Video Footage of "Alien Space Craft" WATCHING ISS Astronaut! UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 1
A Explained: astronaut's movement causes lunar flag to wave in Apollo 15 footage Conspiracy Theories 0
Mick West Explained: The "Many Faces" of Patrick Crusius, the El Paso Shooter Conspiracy Theories 22
Mick West Explained: "Beam of Light" in To The Stars Academy header images UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: "UFOS" in Donald Trump's Crowd Photo on 4th of July UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 3
D Explained: Photo of 747 with Contrails Only on One Side [Fake, April Fool] Contrails and Chemtrails 21
Qulaey Explained: 17.61 Mile Mirror Flash Supposedly Proves Flat Earth [Refraction] Flat Earth 5
Mick West Explained: The Navy's New "UFO" Reporting Guidelines UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 32
Mick West Explained: "It's photoshopped because it has to be" Flat Earth 3
Mick West Explained: Jet Chasing UFO: X-45A and F/A-18B Formation Flight Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 6
Trailblazer Explained: video of concentric circular "chemtrails" (E-3 Sentry AWACS plane, Feb 1 2019) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 3
Rory Explained: How Mount Rainier helps demonstrate the shape of the globe Flat Earth 38
creatonez Explained: Why the Earth does not look oblate in photos from space Flat Earth 0
MikeG Explained: EU Army Deployed to Paris Conspiracy Theories 1
Mick West Explained: Unexplained Green Light During Thunderstorm Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Mick West Explained: Flashes of Light During the World Trade Center Collapse 9/11 5
Mick West Explained: House "Cut in Half", Tubbs Fire, Santa Rosa, Coffey Park Wildfires 0
Mick West Explained: Burnt Cars on California Beach [TV Set] Wildfires 1
Mick West Explained: Unknown Brewing Company UFO UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: Why Kavanaugh's Calendar PDF looks Edited [OCR] Current Events 0
Mick West Explained: Mysterious Red Planet Like Object Filmed Next To The Moon. Atglen [Reflection] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: Podesta 14 + Fish [Promotional Tweet for UN Global Sustainability Goals] Conspiracy Theories 7
Mick West Explained: Dark Streak UFO Photo - Barn Swallow + Motion Blur UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: DEW Energy Beam Starting Forest Fires - Dirty Lens, Light Streak Conspiracy Theories 13
Mick West Explained: A Dozen Or More Southern Valley UFOs UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: Floating Triangle UFO in Buenos Aires Google Maps [Bridge] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Rory Explained: Space Shuttle Footage Reflection of Face [Shot Through Window] Conspiracy Theories 5
Mick West Explained: Washington State Island "Mystery missile" - Helicopter Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 49
Andrew Gillett Explained: Squares in the sky? [Reflection of lights in a window] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 18
Mick West Explained: Mysterious lights over Milwaukee [Seagulls, Night Exposure Trails] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 27
Mick West Explained: Why Some Marjory Stoneman Douglas Shooting Google Search Results Predate the Event Conspiracy Theories 1
Priyadi Explained: Why We Don't See Satellites in Photos Taken From The ISS Flat Earth 1
Trailblazer Explained: Vatican "chemtrail spraying" coin [part of set depicting Pope's travels] Contrails and Chemtrails 4
deirdre Explained: Mysterious burning crater in Mexico spurs UFO crash speculation (Garbage pit) UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Benjamin Moore Explained: Why Earth Has A Magnetic Core Even Though the core is Molten Metal Flat Earth 2
FlightMuj Explained: Photo from ISS shows "open window" [Scratch Cover] Flat Earth 2
Mick West Explained: "Smoke Trails" On 9/11 World Trade Center Falling Debris [Dust/Powder] 9/11 10
Mick West Explained: Roy Moore Two Color Yearbook Signature [Depth of Field Chromatic Aberration] Conspiracy Theories 34
Mick West Explained: Why Planes Get Dented Nosecones - It's Mostly Birds General Discussion 4
Mick West Explained: Unburned trees next to burned down structures as evidence of secret "energy weapons" Wildfires 120
Mick West Explained: Photo of "UFO" Used in Connection with Nimitz Incident [Balloon] UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 8
Mick West Explained: Mexico City Earthquake Lights [Power Line Arcing and Transformer Explosions] Science and Pseudoscience 30
Mick West Explained: Cloud Seeding Weather Modification in Texas before Hurricane Harvey Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Bunkmeister Explained: Coast Guard Geographic Range Table promoted by flat earthers Flat Earth 15
Mick West Explained: Charlottesville Car Attack License Plates - Ohio GVF 1111 (and GVF 1122) Conspiracy Theories 2
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top