Einstein: "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance"

Ray Von Geezer

Senior Member.
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" - Albert Einstein

I've seen this quote variously around the Interwebs, and more recently in a member's signature here, and wondered where it actually came from. It really doesn't sound like the kind of thing a scientist would say, at least not in the context it's commonly finding itself used nowadays.

Initial investigation (Googl'ing) soon showed that there's no evidence of Einstein (amongst several others) having said it. Looking a little further I found the source is much, much older, and it's had a pretty fascinating journey; from the original author, an 18th century clergyman, to its contemporary (mis)quoting - visiting with homeopathy, Alcoholics Anonymous, Freemasonry and the Jehovah's Witnesses along the way.

"The Survival of a Fitting Quotation" By Michael StGeorge, 2005



Ray Von
 
Last edited:

deirdre

Senior Member.
neat. The book "Paley's Evidences of Christianity" 1839?1854 . not sure i would agree it is only a skeletal resemblance, sounds pretty much the same to me except for maybe "height of".
Capture.PNG


https://books.google.com/books?id=BjQ3AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA455&dq="evidences+of+christianity"+"contempt+prior+to+examination"&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwil8ve2lqfJAhUE2R4KHVsBBT4Q6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q="evidences of christianity" "contempt prior to examination"&f=false

edit add: well wait, i have to read the dang thign to see if that is from Paley himself as it seems our "editor" Charles Murray Narnes, added notes from himself and others. :) either way its in this book before Einstein was born.
 
Last edited:

deirdre

Senior Member.
i love this thread topic @Ray Von Geezer . Not only is the original context of this "quote" completely different then what i assumed it was about based on the "einstein" tag.

But its a great example of something i often ponder. Does a "quote" belong to the person who said it exactly (or very close to exactly), or does a quote belong to the person who came up with the original idea behind the quote.
 

Ray Von Geezer

Senior Member.
i love this thread topic @Ray Von Geezer . Not only is the original context of this "quote" completely different then what i assumed it was about based on the "einstein" tag.

But its a great example of something i often ponder. Does a "quote" belong to the person who said it exactly (or very close to exactly), or does a quote belong to the person who came up with the original idea behind the quote.
It's interesting to see how it's been taken from its original meaning and evolved in over two centuries, particularly how it seems to have regularly been appropriated to justify belief in "woo".

I think for me some quotes are so good they can stand up on their own, so it barely matters who really said it. Like the old "The definition of insanity....", another "Einstein" truism... (or not...).

This one though.... I can see how it makes sense in the original context, but "If you don't take any old tosh that I care to throw at you seriously, then you're a fool. Einstein sez." is pretty ridiculous, even if he had said the original quote. I guess it's a fictional response to something like Brian Cox saying "The problem with today’s world is that everyone believes they have the right to express their opinion AND have others listen to it....."

Ray Von
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
This one though.... I can see how it makes sense in the original context, but "If you don't take any old tosh that I care to throw at you seriously, then you're a fool. Einstein sez." is pretty ridiculous
oh yea, i didnt mean einstein of course in regards to attribution of that quote. i meant more do we attribute it to Paley or maybe "Narnes" whose paraphrase is alot closer. Attributing it to einstein at all, without a reference that he ever actually said it anywhere, is dirty pool because people think Einstein was super smart so must be right.

from above pdf.. more 'smart' people who supposedly said it. Googlable for verification says the PDF author.
all.PNG
 
Last edited:
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Edward Current Needs Debunking: That the GPS does not implement time corrections from Einstein's relativity Science and Pseudoscience 7
lee h oswald Galileo - Descartes - Newton - Darwin - The Quantum mechanics - Bohr/Einstein - ? General Discussion 90
lotek Cannabis Cures Cancer.... An experiment in public self condemnation... Science and Pseudoscience 67
SkepticSteve Assuming you are an ET: How would you identify nuclear technologies without direct knowledge? UFOs and Aliens 8
chrono117 How to Debunk Flat Earth Without Relying on NASA or Photos Flat Earth 42
John85 How could the interior collapse in WTC7 Move West Without More Visible Exterior Damage 9/11 63
E** Claim: TSA allowing illegals to fly without verifiable ID General Discussion 0
Mick West How to Reply - With and Without Quoting other Posts How To 0
Mick West Debunked: UN: "The World Won't Cool Without Chemtrails" IPCC Contrails and Chemtrails 9
Alchemist Debunked: Michael Hastings Cremated Without Family's Permission Conspiracy Theories 1
Mattnik 'Passenger jet flies 800 kilometres without a pilot' New Scientist Contrails and Chemtrails 8
Trigger Hippie Debunked: "We will bury you without firing a shot" Quotes Debunked 7
cheeple Americans can now be killed without due process Conspiracy Theories 1
Mick West Debunked: Honey without pollen Science and Pseudoscience 18

Related Articles

Top