Debunked: Vimeo Video Proves Sandy Hook Was Preplanned

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
So the theory is that since the video is dated Nov 10th 2012, and the attack was on Dec 14th 2012, then this "proves" the attack was preplanned:

 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Ah, it looks like in Vimeo you can replace an older video with a different file, and then edit the name, and it keeps the date of the original video as the upload date. So the explanations are:

A) It was deliberately back-dated as a hoax,
B) It was inadvertently back-dated as Ametrano did something like overwrite an old video to save space
C) Some bug

 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Looks like the original was Dec 17th, according to his comment on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCokgkHOhGk


 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
He's just updated the video with an explanation, which is B.

https://vimeo.com/53220123



 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
The original upload was done on Nov 10th, auto-tweeted:



https://twitter.com/bacmaster/status/267326143923904512

So it must have been some unimportant video that he overwrite later so as not to pay for bandwidth. Vimeo is limited to 500MB per week, so if you create a lot of movies in one week, then the only way to upload them all without paying extra is to overwrite old movies.
 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
He's made his Vimeo account and Twitter feed private now. He seemed quite upset by the attention.
 

FreiZeitGeist

Senior Member.
Great Debunking by Mick but a real bad story if this will end in a closing of the originated Channels.

What do you think our friends with the tinfoil-caps would think about this?

"The Video isn´t visible anymore! There is a Conspirancy running!!!!"
 
A

adac

Guest
The problem is still the twitter post https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/737508_488942644491498_215912594_o.jpg .
Because you can post a vimeo link on twitter and then on saving immediately the title and the description of the video is fetched and saved on twitter.

When you now exchange the video on vimeo that doesn't seem to affect the old previously fetched twitter title and description from the old video. See: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...7073092.106418.296574443728320&type=1&theater

Can you try to explain and debunk that?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
The problem is still the twitter post https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/737508_488942644491498_215912594_o.jpg .
Because you can post a vimeo link on twitter and then on saving immediately the title and the description of the video is fetched and saved on twitter.

When you now exchange the video on vimeo that doesn't seem to affect the old previously fetched twitter title and description from the old video. See: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...7073092.106418.296574443728320&type=1&theater

Can you try to explain and debunk that?

yes:


In the image above, the black rectangle with the Vimeo video is linked directly to Vimeo, so it's always current (technically it's an "iframe" element). But the text below it is stored and fetched in twitter, so it's not as current as the direct Vimeo video. It will only get updated when (and if) Twitter re-reads the description.

So, it looks like the change is not immediate. The old description seems to stay there for a while. I suspect this is because Twitter is caching the old description to avoid having to re-read it from Vimeo every time the tweet is displayed. This saves bandwidth, and is a cost and performance optimization.

https://twitter.com/dutchsinse/status/288902138724245504


So the question would be how the cache gets updated. There seem to be three possible things going on:

A) The cache is updated only when someone views the media attached to the tweet, then it's "stuck" on that version
B) The cache is updated periodically, say every 24 or 48 hours, after it expires.
C) The cache is updated only when it's viewed after the cache has been flushed

If A is the case, then the description is not going to change, and the reason the Ametrano video has the new description is that nobody viewed that original "My Video" tweet's Vimeo media until after the title had been changed, so it got stuck on the second version. Another experiment would confim if this is the case (you'd need a twitter account that had no followers, to ensure nobody looked at the tweet's media).

I suspect B is most likely, as caches usually work with an expiration time. So we just have to wait a day or two, and the dutchsinse tweet will eventually refresh with the new description (assuming dutch does not realize this, and takes it down to hide this). It might take longer though, as media titles are things that are unlikely to change, so the cache time-out might be set for a week or more.
 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Okay, I created a test account, tweeted a link to the video, and it got the new description:

https://twitter.com/MickWest6/status/289498860135518208


More importantly, when I looked at dutch's twitter feed, it was now updated to the new description, proving twitter vimeo descriptions can be updated after the initial tweet:

as of 2:20PM Jan 10 2012
https://twitter.com/dutchsinse/status/288902138724245504


Hence, it was just being cached on Twitter, and either my new tweeting of the video flushed the cache, or it just expired naturally.

Either way, it's debunked.
 
Last edited:
A

adac

Guest
Thank you.

my first thought also was about a cache that is periodically updated with title and description. In the meanwhile dutch'es vimeo tweet has been (automagically) refetched and new title is there. So this looks like as if it is debunked.

However what we not know for sure: Did twitter always do update the cached that before today ;-)
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Dutch has deleted his posts about this, seeming to claim that the Twitter post had been retroactively changed.



In reality NOTHING changed in the tweet. The tweet is exactly as it was. All that changed was the description of the video that the tweet linked to, and that was simply not updated immediately, as it was cached.
 
Last edited:

Anonymous012

Closed Account
Did anyone do this debunking as well? The reason I posted in here because you guys were talking about the dates, so this is like one of them even though it's different subject!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn848Pd_xMQ&list=FLSYEEnTsfvmSRHY-F0NxRAg&index=3
Sandy Hook "Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!" BUSTED! PART 2/2

It has other stuff in the video, but this guy shows that Union Way of Western Connecticut was scamming people for donations because their link was posted on December 11, 2012. I think Google fixed it by now, but the nay-sayers still believe it's a "cover up."
United Way of Western Youtube Clip.jpg


Here's the donation page: https://newtown.uwwesternct.org/ When I was investigating, I had to click on Facebook, and found this reply, a few days ago. 01.08.2013

Here's their Facebook response:
UntitledWay of Western Connecticut Facebook Response.jpg
Source: https://www.facebook.com/pages/United-Way-of-Western-Connecticut/44789157732?ref=hl
It looked like an issue was from Google's problem, and not the United Way of Western Connecticut.

And here's another one that can be debatable, it's from the same guy who upload the video one I've posted up top.
Youtube Video Screen Shot.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JgnpKR1-jg
Sandy Hook "Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!" BUSTED! PART 1/2

On video 0:44, he's talkin about a lady name Desaree Juarez who had a GoFundMe site, and she put down asking for donation for the victims of Sandy Hook; however, it was created on 12.13.2012.

Here's the Google Search I did:

Desaree Juarez Google Search.jpg

Edit on picture: *The day I view the video....

The page is no longer available; however, there's always Google cache:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...y-hook-victims-fund+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

In her defense: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Bay-Area-Responds-to-26Acts-of-Kindness-183989591.html
She left a comment about why her GoFundMe page was made on 12.13.2012
Desaree Juarez Response.jpg

However, I don't know how legit she is, but just saying that because GoFundMe can have legit people or have scammers. Her GoFundMe page was down, but it's either due to harassment, or it was due to something else. And if GoFundMe allows you to replace pages and keep the same date, this could be debunked as well. :confused: However, the first one is more understandable as it was Google's fault, and I'm pretty sure both sides keep their e-mail as proof of evidence.
 

jvnk08

Senior Member.
Did anyone do this debunking as well? The reason I posted in here because you guys were talking about the dates, so this is like one of them even though it's different subject!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn848Pd_xMQ&list=FLSYEEnTsfvmSRHY-F0NxRAg&index=3
Sandy Hook "Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!" BUSTED! PART 2/2

It has other stuff in the video, but this guy shows that Union Way of Western Connecticut was scamming people for donations because their link was posted on December 11, 2012. I think Google fixed it by now, but the nay-sayers still believe it's a "cover up."
United Way of Western Youtube Clip.jpg


Here's the donation page: https://newtown.uwwesternct.org/ When I was investigating, I had to click on Facebook, and found this reply, a few days ago. 01.08.2013

Here's their Facebook response:
UntitledWay of Western Connecticut Facebook Response.jpg
Source: https://www.facebook.com/pages/United-Way-of-Western-Connecticut/44789157732?ref=hl
It looked like an issue was from Google's problem, and not the United Way of Western Connecticut.

Google has trouble with dynamic pages. You can check out this search on google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=san...=cdr:1,cd_min:1/1/2012,cd_max:12/10/2012&tbm=

Note the 4th link down, discussing the supposed foreknowledge of the event itself.....on Dec 2nd.
 

Anonymous012

Closed Account
Google has trouble with dynamic pages. You can check out this search on google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=sandy+hook+massacre&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1366&bih=677&sa=X&ei=Pr71UOabMKLV0QW28YCYBg&ved=0CB0QpwUoBg&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2012%2Ccd_max%3A12%2F10%2F2012&tbm=

Note the 4th link down, discussing the supposed foreknowledge of the event itself.....on Dec 2nd.

Thank you for this! lol! Oh wow on the dated links! Here's the 4th link if this is the one you're refering to: http://philosophers-stone.co.uk/wor...-massacre-evidence-of-official-foreknowledge/ The person wrote it on December 21. In a joking way, Google's mix-match of incorrect dates; it's like they can predict things before they even happen! Google sees all! :D
 

methinks

New Member
Good job. I debunked this one in less then 5 minutes after YouTube hoaxter "MaxMalone" went nuts over it. Glad to see others actually do more then watch the YouTube videos before joining the chorus.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Theferäl [Debunked] Object Seen From Airplane Above Canberra: 04 Apr 2012 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 8
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 75
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 8
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: "Nancy Pelosi's long time Chief of Staff is a key executive at Dominion Voting" Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: Wisconsin Turnout 89% Impossible High [Actually 72%] Election 2020 1
Mick West Debunked: Video of Poll Worker "Filling In" Ballots. Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 4
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top