Debunked: Significant Increase in Volcano Eruptions

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member


The above chart is based on data from the Smithsonian Institution's Global Volcanism Program (GVP_ database of eruptions, it's a count of all the eruptions that started in each year, from 1945 to 2015. It shows about 35 new eruptions per year, but with a lot of variation from about 25 to 50 per year. The trend over the full period is basically flat, and while there was a slight increase on average from about 1997 to 2008, this is balanced by a decline in recent years.

This year, 2015, shows only 12 eruptions so far, if it continues at that rate we will have about 33 this year, a bit below average. The 12 confirmed eruptions are:
  • Tara, Batu
  • Tungurahua
  • Ubinas
  • Turrialba
  • Turrialba
  • Chikurachki
  • Fournaise, Piton de la
  • San Miguel
  • Karymsky
  • Pacaya
  • Soputan
  • Klyuchevskoy
So why then do we have stories like this:
http://www.infowars.com/40-volcanoe...ow-and-34-of-them-are-along-the-ring-of-fire/

Why is he saying there are 40 Volcanoes erupting right now, when the Smithsonian only lists 12 confirmed new eruptions so far?

The problem is that Snyder is comparing two very different things. "Eruptions per year, as counted by the Smithsonian's GVP" is not the same thing as "erupting right now, according to Volcano Discovery". He's comparing one measurement against a different measurement. His historical figures are actually accurate, as they use the same Smithsonian data. There were actually 35 per year, on average, from 1900 to 1999. But if you actually look at the most recent data from the same source then the average has actually dropped a bit, to 33 (from 1945 to 2015), and has been declining in recent years.

So what is this "40 volcanoes around the globe are erupting right now"? The figure comes from Volcano Discovery, a volcano tourism site that maintains a list of where there is volcanic activity, so people interested in visiting volcanos can find active volcanos. Volcano Discovery lists volcanoes that are either "erupting" (marked in red), or in a state of "unrest" (yellow), like this:


The difference here seems to be that the two sources have a different cut-off criteria for what constitutes an "eruption". The Smithsonian GVP notes:

Whereas Volcano Discovery seems to just include any report of activity that might be of interest to a Volcano tourist, and also includes the "more than a dozen" volcanos that have continuous activity.

When trying to determine if there has been a change, you have to compare like with like. If we look at the GVP data, we see no change. We can see that the GVP data is different to the VD data, but can we see if the VD data itself indicates any change? The VD data is from there page "What's Erupting", which has been operating in this form since January 2012, as can be seen on the Internet Archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120118231502/http://www.volcanodiscovery.com/erupting_volcanoes.html

Which shows 31 erupting volcanoes, however 21 of them are volcanos that are still listed as "erupting" in May 2015 (I've marked them with green in the image above). If we then go forward to Jun 22 2014, we again have 31, but now 19 of them were listed in both 2012 and 2015.

There's not enough data to determine any trend from VD, but what we can say is that the majority of volcanoes that they list are not new activity at all, and are simply volcanoes that show some activity pretty much every year.

The bottom line - looking at the actual Smithsonian data shows no increase. The Volcano Discovery is a different data set aimed at tourists, which you can't directly compare with the Smithsonian. Even then, the VD data does not show an increase that not within normal variations.

One final thing, Snyder says "34 of them are on the Ring of Fire". Well that's hardly surprising, seeing as the Ring of Fire spans the entire world, and contains 75% of the worlds active and dormant volcanoes.



Link to raw Smithsonian data: https://www.metabunk.org/sk/GVP_Eruption_Results.xls (38MB file)
 
Last edited:

Henk001

Senior Member.
Thanks. I often encounter claims like these. This is very helpful in rebutting them. Likewise the increase in the number of earthquakes, sinkholes, etc., supposedly indicating the imminent arrival of Nibiru, the end of the world, the return of Jesus, or whatever.
I tried to figure out what was true about the earthquakes claim a few years ago:
upload_2015-5-16_6-47-40.png
source: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/
 

David Coulter

Senior Member.
Similar claims have popped up over the last year in geologic discussion groups on LinkedIn (and other places); the primary one being that a cataclysmic eruption of the Yellowstone Caldera was imminent. It got so annoying that the scientists at the Yellowstone Volcanic Observatory (YVO) responded:

 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
There's an old GVP FAQ on the topic:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090730080558/http://www.volcano.si.edu/faq/index.cfm?faq=06



Note their chart shows active volcanoes, not new eruptions, which is what the top chart measures.
 

Chew

Senior Member.
Likewise the increase in the number of earthquakes, sinkholes, etc., supposedly indicating the imminent arrival of ...
And meteors. Don't forget meteors. :D

During the height of the Nibiru hysteria there were numerous fearmongers claiming an increase in meteor activity. I graphed the number of meteors detected per day by NASA's Fireballs Network all-sky cameras to show there hadn't been any increase. It is only for cameras 1 through 4; they add more cameras from time to time so I just used those cameras. Here is an updated graph. The red line is the linear trend.

fireballs as of 2015-05-14.png
 

Henk001

Senior Member.
And meteors. Don't forget meteors. :D

During the height of the Nibiru hysteria there were numerous fearmongers claiming an increase in meteor activity. I graphed the number of meteors detected per day by NASA's Fireballs Network all-sky cameras to show there hadn't been any increase. It is only for cameras 1 through 4; they add more cameras from time to time so I just used those cameras. Here is an updated graph. The red line is the linear trend.
Thanks again. Useful as well. Nice to see the Perseids and Geminids peak every year. I still have a question. The vertical axis says "meteors per day". But when I spend a night watching Perseids I see a few dozen per hour. So I wonder if this is about all meteors or just fireballs?
 

croy153

New Member
Quakesstacked2.png
Thanks. I often encounter claims like these. This is very helpful in rebutting them. Likewise the increase in the number of earthquakes, sinkholes, etc., supposedly indicating the imminent arrival of Nibiru, the end of the world, the return of Jesus, or whatever.
I tried to figure out what was true about the earthquakes claim a few years ago:
View attachment 12881
source: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/
Hey,
I noticed what you did until I added all other magnitudes from 4.0 and up. Sorry the chart is a little busy. What do You think?
 

Henk001

Senior Member.
View attachment 12934
Hey,
I noticed what you did until I added all other magnitudes from 4.0 and up. Sorry the chart is a little busy. What do You think?
I think Hama Neggs is right. From the USGS:
A bit more info from http://alabamaquake.com/education.html
 
Last edited:

croy153

New Member
I think Hama Neggs is right. From the USGS:
A bit more info from http://alabamaquake.com/education.html

Thanks for this detailed response. The information is really helpful in regards understanding what's really happening and how to interrupt the data.
 

DeWild1

New Member
There has been more 4.0 and above lately than ever before recoded. This is just sleep fuel. Never mind the active volcanoes and Mt. St. Hellen getting ready to pop again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Spectrar Ghost

Senior Member.
There has been more 4.0 and above lately than ever before recoded.
Source?
Never mind the active volcanoes
Which ones? What about them?

...and Mt. St. Hellen getting ready to pop again.
Source?

 

Mark Holtz

New Member


The above chart is based on data from the Smithsonian Institution's Global Volcanism Program (GVP_ database of eruptions, it's a count of all the eruptions that started in each year, from 1945 to 2015. It shows about 35 new eruptions per year, but with a lot of variation from about 25 to 50 per year. The trend over the full period is basically flat, and while there was a slight increase on average from about 1997 to 2008, this is balanced by a decline in recent years.
Link to raw Smithsonian data: https://www.metabunk.org/sk/GVP_Eruption_Results.xls (38MB file)
Do you happen to have a link to that chart at the top of your post? I'm in a debate with some conspiracy theorists who insist that volcanic activity is through the roof the last several years, and you can't tell them otherwise, because last year there were two volcanoes erupting at the same time on different parts of the globe and that's never happened before in all of history so THERE!!! If I could link that chart, it would be a boon, but I can't find it on the website you linked.

Thanks...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mark Holtz

New Member
Ah, OK... thanks. As it is, they seem to have accepted the chart without a link - or at least, didn't challenge it. Kinda scurried away from it, to be honest... I just hate posting data without cites, but in this case it appears to have worked out OK.

Apparently, earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, and storms are at an all time high. For some mysterious reason, nobody can provide any supporting data for that, but it just is. And that's that! :-D
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
It looks like you can download to a spreadsheet format.
Okay I figures it out again, so I'll write it down this time :)

From Smithsonian Institution's Global Volcanism Program (GVP_ database of eruptions), I selected "Confirmed eruptions", then "Check all (countries)". Then on the next page, "Download Results to Excel".

I then made a column of the numbers 1945 to 2018, then an adjacent column with the formula:

=COUNTIF($I$3:$I$100000,Z2)

(Where the I column is the year per eruption, and Z is the new year column)

This gives:


Metabunk 2018-12-30 22-52-19.jpg

and I've added a chart just by selecting the two new columns. Then pretty it up, and add a trend line.

This one is to 2018, and there's really been no change.
Metabunk 2018-12-30 22-54-14.jpg
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Obama called Michelle "Michael" in a speech. (Referring to Michael Mullen Jr) Quotes Debunked 0
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
Rory Debunked: The Lunar Cycle affects birth rates Health and Quackery 26
Rory Debunked: Study shows link between menstrual cycle and the moon Health and Quackery 30
novatron Debunked: California Wildfires Match the Exactly Path of the Proposed Rail System Wildfires 3
Rory Debunked: "You must love yourself before you love another" - fake Buddha quote Quotes Debunked 7
W Debunked: Qanon claims there have been 51k sealed indictments filed this year. Current Events 11
K Debunked: Audio of David Rockefeller "leaked" speech in 1991 [Audio Simulation] General Discussion 2
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
Mick West Debunked: XYO Device Replacing GPS, Saving $2 Million a Day General Discussion 23
Mick West Debunked: "Tip Top" as a QAnon Clue from Trump [He's said it before] Conspiracy Theories 3
Whitebeard Debunked: Nibiru FOUND? Mysterious gigantic rogue planet spotted lurking outside our solar system Science and Pseudoscience 1
Mick West Debunked: "There Exists a Shadowy Government" — Daniel Inouye Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: Delta Lambda Compression General Discussion 16
MisterB Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
JFDee Debunked: Wernher von Braun confirmed that rockets can't leave earth Conspiracy Theories 23
Mick West Debunked: Missing $21 Trillion / $6.5 Trillion / $2.3 Trillion - Journal Vouchers Conspiracy Theories 33
MikeG Debunked: Obamacare Article 54 (Satire FB Page) General Discussion 2
Mick West Debunked: "Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth’s Surface:" [Stray Light] Contrails and Chemtrails 30
Astro Debunked: Apollo Lunar Module Hatch Too Small for Spacesuit Science and Pseudoscience 0
Mick West Debunked: NIST's Lack of Explanation for WTC7 Freefall [They Have One - Column Buckling] 9/11 38
Jedo Debunked: WTC7 was the only building not on the WTC block that had a fire on 9/11 9/11 0
Mick West Debunked: Thermite Slag on WTC beams [Oxy Cutting Slag] 9/11 2
Mick West Debunked: The WTC 9/11 Angle Cut Column. [Not Thermite, Cut Later] 9/11 137
Mick West Debunked: AE911Truth's Analysis of Slag Residue from WTC Debris 9/11 20
Dan Wilson Debunked: Steven Crowder: The AIDS epidemic was a hoax Health and Quackery 9
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top