Debunked: Geoengineering Map by ETC Group

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
ETC Group just publish this map of what they claim is geoengineering around the world for the past 50 years.

http://www.etcgroup.org/content/world-geoengineering


Full sized image: https://www.metabunk.org/files/geoEmap_v17_mock.jpeg

Looks like a lot. However the map is very misleading. The majority of the points on the map are things that even the ETC group admits are not really geoengineering. Most of the remainder are things that are still in the very early theoretical, or research stages.

Specifically:

These are LOCAL manipulations. They just increase or decrease the precipitation (rain or snow) for a very short period of time, and in a limited area. They are not geoengineering, which is a manipulation of the climate, and not the weather. Even ETC agrees with this, on the same map!


Note they also say the same about Biochar.

Biochar could be considered geoengineering, as it locks in the carbon underground, so decreases the net amount of carbon in the atmosphere. However notice all those Biochar projects in Africa?

Who knew African countries were so interested in Geoengineering? Well, they are not. The vast majority of biochar projects (which are all very small scale) are done because of the benefits to crop yields, and not for their carbon benefits.


Two forms of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). But as they note, that's not considered geoengineering either. CCS is simply a way of reducing carbon emissions, usually from power stations. If reducing carbon emissions is geoengineering, then you'll want to include electric cars, and LED lightbulbs as well.


The problem with this category is that these things do not exist, except as proposals, and some research projects. There is no commercial deployment of artificial trees or carbon suckers. And it's really just a less direct form of CCS.


Again, none of these ideas has been deployed, or even got to the stage of field experiments. The closest thing to an artificial volcano that is out there is the SPICE project, which got to the stage of proposing a scale test of a balloon and hose system, which has not yet happened.
The only thing that might fall into this category is the white roof initiative. But that's more of an energy saving proposal than geoengineering.


These are things that are very much in the theoretical and small-stage experiment stage.

The ETC group raises some very valid concerns about geoengineering. These concerns are largely shared by the scientists working in the field. There is a huge amount of uncertainty as to what will happen to the planet under any of the geoengineering proposals, if they are put into practice. That is why there is practically zero going on in the world that could be considered active geoengineering. It's all very much theoretical, and small scale experiments.

Unfortunately this map gives the opposite impression. It makes it seem like geoengineering is a widespread activity that has being going on for 50 years. That impression is highly misleading, and will only serve to provide fodder to those who are motivated by fear and conspiracy theories. Now they have a map where they can say "Geoengineering finally admitted!" when the reality is nothing like the picture.
 
Last edited:

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
I decided to write them, perhaps some of the organization is not aware of what this map really is saying. I suggest that everyone should write.



joelle@etcgroup.org
jim@etcgroup.org
kjo@etcgroup.org
veronica@etcgroup.org
silvia@etcgroup.org
neth@etcgroup.org
kirubel@etcgroup.org

Subject: ETC's Misleading Map of Geoengineering

Dear Sirs/Madam,
Today I became aware of a map which ETC group has put out supposedly depicting what you call "large-scale manipulation of earth or climate systems".

However, the majority of what you show on the map doesn't qualify at all as geoengineering, as succinctly pointed out by Mick West here:

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/549-Debunked-Geoengineering-Map-by-ETC-Group

I suggest you peruse Mick's polite and accurate criticism of what you have put out and ask yourselves if you indeed feel that your map is an accurate way to depict the subject.

In my opinion, it is not accurate at all

Sincerely,
Jay Reynolds.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
That was me, thanks Craig! rbutr looks quite interesting. I saw it on Tim Farley's site.
 
J

JRR

Guest
Update/correction:


100 tonnes of iron sulphate dumped into the Pacific

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/15/pacific-iron-fertilisation-geoengineering
http://www.timescolonist.com/business/Haida+Gwaii+have+created+life+there/7396120/story.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/17/canada-geoengineering-pacific?intcmp=122


and-also:


(Near_Future USA) US geoengineers to spray sun-reflecting chemicals from balloon
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jul/17/us-geoengineers-spray-sun-balloon?intcmp=239
http://www.egu.eu/home/geoengineering-could-disrupt-rainfall-patterns
 
U

Unregistered

Guest
search 'weather modification'. it's been going on for decades with many companies in the US all over the world. weather mod is geoengeneering
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
search 'weather modification'. it's been going on for decades with many companies in the US all over the world. weather mod is geoengeneering

Weather modification (cloud seeding) is generally NOT considered geoengineering, however it is on the map. See the first post where I discuss this.

Cloud seeding has never been secret.
 

MikeC

Closed Account
Rather than mail bomb them I've enquired through their website what their sources are for ascribing Ocean Fertilisation, Algae Schemes, Reduced Precipitation and Biochar to New Zealand - I've not heard of an of these being done here - except some complaints that chemtrails causing drought ...but then that same site complains that chemtrails cause rain.......... it's kinda hard to follow sometimes :rolleyes:
 

FreiZeitGeist

Senior Member.
Update/correction:

100 tonnes of iron sulphate dumped into the Pacific

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/15/pacific-iron-fertilisation-geoengineering

This was done by a private company that seems to do it without asking any gouverment.

And much more important:

Simular Experiments where done twice by german Researche-Ship "Polarstern". The idea is to feed PLankton while they are blooming, so the plankton makes more poll then usal and the unused poll with bound Co2 on it will sink to the ground.

These experiments called "Lohaflex" and "Eisenex" both failed, because the polls where eaten by other creatures like crabs and they growed in population too.

see http://www.awi.de/en/news/press_rel...dioxide/?tx_list_pi1[mode]=6&cHash=ffd0b4deee

This seems to be a useless way to control the climate. If a private company do this to "save our world" it´s a risky play by them and officials should check out legal methodes against it.


And this seems to be a second try for Project Spice - a tethered balloon flying in the higth of 20 Kilometers with a pipeline to the ground, pumping water or aerosols into that high. A testfield-Project for Spice with a balloon in 1 KM altitude was often delayed and finally canceled in Great Britain. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_Particle_Injection_for_Climate_Engineering#Project_status

Testbed configuration:



The Concept of the whole project would be a fleet of about 20 Ships/Balloons



... that would be really impossible to hide and can´t be done secretly!

Remember, these Balloons should fly in an altitude of 20 Kilometers. Some weeks ago FElix Baumgartner jumped from an Altitude of 39 Kilometers. Just to imagine of what an altitude they are thinking about.

This is a View from 22 Kilometers Altitude from a test-Jump by Felix Baumgartner:



Interesting, that Chemtrail-believers allways posting what they found about Geo-Engineering. No matter if it was too high for planes (Stratosphere) or too deep - And even some Experiments with Plankton under Water are used as evidence for chemtrails...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

SR1419

Senior Member.
Unfortunately this map...makes it seem like geoengineering is a widespread activity that has being going on for 50 years. That impression is highly misleading, and will only serve to provide fodder to those who are motivated by fear and conspiracy theories. Now they have a map where they can say "Geoengineering finally admitted!" when the reality is nothing like the picture.

This map is used by our friend Jim Lee (REZN8R) as "proof" of on going Geo-engineering projects and is used by him to stoke the fear and hype of all things Weather Mod/geo-engineering/Chemtrails

Its unfortunate that when one points out that a laboratory experiment that tries to turn algae into fuel is hardly globally implemented "geoengineering" one is met with cries of "shill" and censorship.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
skephu Debunked: Dutch Government Admit Chemtrails Exist Contrails and Chemtrails 7
mrfintoil Debunked: CIA Director admits chemtrails, geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection Contrails and Chemtrails 24
MikeG Debunked: Geoengineering Killing Great Barrier Reef Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Mick West Debunked: A Snow Test for Signs of Geoengineering, Portland Oregon Contrails and Chemtrails 7
skephu Debunked: Geoengineering And The Ozone Layer Recovery Lie Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Trailblazer Debunked: "Top climate scientist Tim Lenton admits to ongoing geoengineering" Contrails and Chemtrails 23
Mick West Debunked: Strontium as Footprint of Geoengineering Proposals or Patents [There is none] Contrails and Chemtrails 24
Mick West Debunked: J. Marvin Herndon's "Geoengineering" Articles in Current Science (India) and IJERPH Contrails and Chemtrails 355
3 Debunked: Fort Lauderdale Passes Resolution Banning Aerial Aerosol Dispersement General Discussion 6
derrick06 Debunked: HAARP ELF waves causing a earthquake Contrails and Chemtrails 12
Mick West Debunked: The Science Claims of Global March Against Chemtrails and Geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Mick West Debunked: Geoengineering Watch's confirmation of "Record Shattering UV Levels" Contrails and Chemtrails 73
mrfintoil Debunked: SKYSCRATCH - The Geoengineering/Chemtrail Cover Up Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Mick West Debunked: Aerosol Geoengineering Film Footage Reality [Fuel Dumps] Contrails and Chemtrails 54
Mick West Debunked: Ice Boulders on Great Lakes Caused by Geoengineering [Natural but Rare Ball Ice] General Discussion 11
Mick West Debunked: Patents. As Evidence of Chemtrails, Geoengineering, Existence, Operability, or Intent Contrails and Chemtrails 62
Mick West Debunked: Rosalind Peterson "Leaker" Addressing UN about Chemtrails and Geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 85
Mick West Debunked: Obama Geoengineering April Fools Joke on Huffington Post Contrails and Chemtrails 2
solrey Debunked: Weatherwar101-Geoengineering ice storm Cleon HAARP 10
Mick West Debunked: Shade, The Motion Picture - Chemtrails and Geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 24
Mick West Debunked: Global Dimming vs. Global Brightening, as evidence for Geoengineering or Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 66
Mick West Debunked: CIA studying Geoengineering, Climate Engineering, Weather Warfare Contrails and Chemtrails 67
Mick West Debunked: Geoengineering Terminated Worldwide at Worldwide Geoengineering Conference Contrails and Chemtrails 25
HappyMonday DEBUNKED: David Lim - Public talks on geoengineering / chemtrails in the UK Contrails and Chemtrails 159
Jay Reynolds Debunked: Ship Trails Over the Pacific are Geoengineering "Chemtrails" Contrails and Chemtrails 37
Jay Reynolds Debunked- Dane Wigington's 10 "bullet" points regarding geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 34
Jay Reynolds Debunked: Geoengineering over Maui, Hawaii Contrails and Chemtrails 25
Jay Reynolds Debunked: Suffolk County, NY Geoengineering Law Contrails and Chemtrails 68
Mick West Debunked: Holdren admits Obama Administration is performing Geoengineering Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: Alex Jones, PJ Watson, Geoengineering: Our Environment Under Attack Contrails and Chemtrails 12
Mick West Debunked: CFR Admits "Millions Spent to Confuse Public About Geoengineering" Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: "Geoengineering is like free-riding on our Grandkids" Quotes Debunked 5
Mythic Suns [Debunked] Viral internet meme indirectly claiming that Greenland has already fully melted. Science and Pseudoscience 6
T AiG Debunked: Fossils Fail to Find Major Transition From Dinosaurs to Birds Science and Pseudoscience 10
Rory Debunked: UK undertaker's claim that Covid vaccine is responsible for spike in deaths Coronavirus COVID-19 7
Marc Powell Debunked: 9/11 truth experts are knowledgeable professionals and their judgments are to be trusted 9/11 195
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosions preparatory to demolition of the WTC North Tower are visible as Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower 9/11 7
Mick West Debunked: Pfizer Developing a Twice-Per-Day COVID Pill, Taken Alongside Vaccines Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition “squib” is visible at top of WTC North Tower before Flight 11 crash 9/11 67
Marc Powell Debunked: Construction worker Philip Morelli experienced an explosion in the sub-basement of the North Tower 9/11 0
Marc Powell Debunked: ABC News correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported an explosion in the subway 9/11 1
Marc Powell Debunked: Debris from twin towers was projected upward by explosives 9/11 13
Marc Powell Debunked: Government officials revealed having foreknowledge of Building 7’s collapse 9/11 58
Marc Powell Debunked: NIST computer simulation of Building 7 collapse is inaccurate 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: FEMA reported finding evidence that steel had melted. 9/11 47
Marc Powell Debunked: VP Dick Cheney ordered a standdown of jet fighters on 9/11 9/11 16
Oystein Debunked: Claim that Bobby McIlvaine's injuries ("lacerations") are best explained as result of glass shards and debris from bombs 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: World Trade Center should not have collapsed due to 9/11 fires 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Firefighter reports of secondary explosions 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Steel was hurled hundreds of feet by explosives 9/11 4
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top