Debunked: Fake Snow, Burning Snow.

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
I feed the squirrels in my yard GMO crops. They are all 2 and 1/2 feet tall and seem to be making stone tools. Some of the younger ones hang around in groups and make the older ones nervous. I'm not about to try and set one on fire.
All my neighborhood has are nano-squirrels.
 

ralph Leo

Member
Has anyone collected and tested the melted snow? Seems like if it had weird non solubles or organic film on top or bottom it would even be visible without testing? I guess once they proclaim it so no proof is needed?
 

Bill

Senior Member.
Has anyone collected and tested the melted snow? Seems like if it had weird non solubles or organic film on top or bottom it would even be visible without testing? I guess once they proclaim it so no proof is needed?
Mine has giant squirrels in it. I'm leaving it alone.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Has anyone collected and tested the melted snow? Seems like if it had weird non solubles or organic film on top or bottom it would even be visible without testing? I guess once they proclaim it so no proof is needed?

They will just claim the fake nano-toxic-whatever has vaporised. Directly into their lungs presumably to give them cancer or make them infertile or wire them up for constant transmission.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
So this lady is lying?

"Geoengineering Whistleblower ~ Ex-Military ~ Kristen Meghan, Hauppauge, NY, January 18th, 2014"
She's certainly mistaken about a large number of things. I'm not sure if she's lying. She accuses me of being a paid shill, which is false.

And snow in Norway melts different than snow in the USA?

"How melting snow with a lighter looks like in Norway"
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=snow not melting norway&sm=12

No. It melts the same. In the norway example the lighter is held above the snow, and for a longer period, and the snow already looks rather wet.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
She's certainly mistaken about a large number of things. I'm not sure if she'd lying. She accuses me of being a paid shill, which is false.



No. It melts the same. In the norway example the lighter is held above the snow, and for a longer period, and the snow already looks rather wet.
you gotta click the "Norway follow up" under the first one. he makes a little seahorse.

seahirse.JPG
 

Attachments

  • upload_2014-2-12_18-15-22.png
    upload_2014-2-12_18-15-22.png
    91.6 KB · Views: 207

Lode

Member
She's certainly mistaken about a large number of things. I'm not sure if she'd lying. She accuses me of being a paid shill, which is false.

No. It melts the same. In the norway example the lighter is held above the snow, and for a longer period, and the snow already looks rather wet.

She might be mistaken about you being a paid shill -I sure give you the benefit of the doubt- but if she is not lying about her job and what she discovered, and about how she was treated... maybe she did discover that they are indeed spraying the air with chemicals. I would give her the benefit of the doubt also.

Besides that, I just found these 2 videos that show the difference. In one of the videos the "snow" doesn't melt into water while being filmed, while the ice does, and in the other just one drop comes of the "snow" after more than 6 minutes held above a hot stove, while another sample scraped from an ice box begins to melt almost right away: first drop at 11 seconds.

"The Day the Snow Wouldn't Melt"

"Shouldn't Snowballs Melt?!?"

I find that strange.

I had posted on YouTube shorty after that documentary came out called "What on Earth are They Spaying?" that it must be a mistake. Otherwise, why had not one single pilot or handler of the chemicals come forth an blow the whistle on it. I even referred to this site:

"Contrail Science"
http://contrailscience.com/

But now after hearing that ex-military lady I send the maker of that documentary an email apologizing for having called him naive in our email exchange.

So I can say still I'm not 100% convinced, but it does look like "something" is out of the ordinary.
 
Last edited:

deirdre

Senior Member.
She might be mistaken about you being a paid shill -I sure give you the benefit of the doubt- but if she is not lying about her job and what she discovered, and about how she was treated... maybe she did discover that they are indeed spraying the air with chemicals. I would give her the benefit of the doubt also.

Besides that, I just found these 2 videos that show the difference. In one videos the "snow" doesn't melt into water while being filmed, in the other just one drop after many minutes held above a hot stove, while another sample scraped from an ice box begins to melt right awa
y.
you should maybe read through the thread. those videos have already been discussed. and theres a whole thread on Kristen Meghan already. https://www.metabunk.org/threads/kr...-force-whistle-blower.1066/page-19#post-88639
 

MikeC

Closed Account
"Shouldn't Snowballs Melt?!?"

They do melt - what they do not always do is DRIP - most of the space in "snow" is actually air - so as they melt the liquid fills in the airspaces.

Check out the snowball in the pan at 4 minutes in this:

 

Lode

Member
OK, so the water is absorbed by the snow. Makes sense. It proves that those claims of "plastic snow" etc. were mistaken. But it does not prove that no chemicals are being sprayed, and/or that no geo-engineering is taking place. Unless all those claims of found chemicals etc. in lab tests of rainwater, snow and soil samples are mistaken too. Or made up.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
OK, so the water is absorbed by the snow. Makes sense. It proves that those claims of "plastic snow" etc. were mistaken. But it does not prove that no chemicals are being sprayed, and/or that no geo-engineering is taking place. Unless all those claims of found chemicals etc. in lab tests of rainwater, snow and soil samples are mistaken too. Or made up.

Generally mistaken. See, eg,
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-shasta-snow-and-water-aluminum-tests.137/
and
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/what-are-the-normal-levels-of-barium-in-soil-and-water.247/

If you've got a specific test in mind, have a search, and then start a new thread if you can't find it, and think it proves something. Read a few of the debunking thread first though, so you understand the science.
 

Lode

Member
Thanks Mick.

I much prefer chemtrails being just contrails of course. As anyone in his sane mind does.

I noticed that my post on using psychological knowledge about the masses and how it is being used was deleted. (It was off topic, I admit.) But since it is so well documented I find it important, and so might many others here. Can I start a new thread on that just posting the video, and if so, where would be an appropriate place?

Kristen Meghan doesn't strike me as dishonest, so she might be mistaken and misinterpreted things. But until I'm 100% sure of that I give her the benefit of the doubt. We know that there are many things governments and corporations do that they hide -or try to hide, until a whistle blower spills the beans- from the masses. And at least some of it is not exactly in the best interest of the people, to put it mildly...
 
Last edited:

MikeC

Closed Account
OK, so the water is absorbed by the snow. Makes sense. It proves that those claims of "plastic snow" etc. were mistaken. But it does not prove that no chemicals are being sprayed, and/or that no geo-engineering is taking place. Unless all those claims of found chemicals etc. in lab tests of rainwater, snow and soil samples are mistaken too. Or made up.

no - but given that there is no evidence of any of that stuff ACTUALLY EXISTING, why bother believing it??

There are numerous cases of "mistaken" evidence (as per Micks post above) - but there are also cases of outright deliberate lying - one recent one is Rady Ananda of ThePeoplesVoice.com
Writing an article titled IPCC warns not to stop chemtrailing Rady states this:
Trouble is he has cherry picked from a longer paragraph:
- taken from the version that TPV has archived for itself as linked in the article.
Here you can clearly see that the IPCC is saying that IF SM is started then it would have to be maintained lest any gains achieved were rapidly lost.
You may or may not agree that global warming exists, or is "man made" or has a "man made" component - but everyone should be able to see that this guy has been blatantly dishonest with his cherry picking here!
then there are the experiments he lists -
I am unsure what the Indians have "admitted to", but the 2 other experiments listed -
Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment home page - a quick look at the platforms (aircraft and satellites) used shows that this "experiment" consists of MEASURING aerosols.
The European Integrated project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality interactions (EUCAARI) is similarly measurement -
Apparently Rady is stuck in high school mode where "experiment" can only mean pouring chemicals into and out of beakers and test tubes!
 

MikeC

Closed Account
Here's another piece of rubbish - Global Skywatch has published something that I am sure they think is the definitive http://gsw.bz/contrails]Truth about Contrails[/url], but the truth about this is that it serves only as an illustration of how many "facts" can someone get wrong in a short bit of writing!
there is no such thing as "high vacuum" - perhaps he means "low pressure"? And of course that is wrong- contrails will form at sea level if the humidity and temperature are suitable - hence "ice fog" in Alaska!
Actually this is more-or-less correct - albeit in a pidgin-technical manner - denser air such as that compressed by a turbo fan will hold more moisture. As long as it remains denser of course....which isn't very long once it leaves the engine!
lol - and that is why the contrails do not form at the output of the turbine, and why they form some distance behind - when the pressure is rapidly reducing - thus also rapidly reducing the temperature!
There is no lack of fuel "in this ratio" - all jet engines seek a "perfect" mixture, which IIRC is about 14:1 air to fuel - some get closer than others, but there is always fuel!!
Using less fuel does not render them "incapable" even by his own reasoning - it should render them less LIKELY by simplistic reasoning - however other considerations actually make it MORE likely- put simply the higher the efficiency of the engine, the higher the temperature at which contrails can form, and so the more likely they are to do so - the math is in the link if you want to examine it closely.
simply said this guy is ignorant, or a liar - ignorant if he actually believes this rubbish and has not been told otherwise, or a liar if he has.
WATER VAPOR IS INVISIBLE - YOU NEVER SEE IT!!
Sorry for shouting, but the level of ignorance or disinfo in just this short piece is appalling!
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I noticed that my post on using psychological knowledge about the masses and how it is being used was deleted. (It was off topic, I admit.) But since it is so well documented I find it important, and so might many others here. Can I start a new thread on that just posting the video, and if so, where would be an appropriate place?

No. See posting guidelines.
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/posting-guidelines.2064/
 

Lode

Member
MikeC,

it does make sense that those in charge would not want to be sprayed themselves -nor their families etc.- with harmful chemicals and compounds, so unless they would believe spraying is harmless -or harmless enough to outweigh the benefits- they would be against it. Still that does not prove it's not happening. Even though some might make false claims and selectively present texts out of context.

But I'm not going to have sleepless nights over it. And I'm glad to see the "fake snow" hype debunked.
 

Lode

Member
Mick, these are the main rules as you know (you might even have written them):

1. To find and expose bunk
2. To prevent bunk from forming and spreading.
3. To develop and promote efficient methods of finding, exposing, and preventing bunk
4. To create re-usable debunkings (antibunk)

On this website many issues that have been presented to the public as true are being debunked. So a very well documented report about how the corporations are telling the public things that aren't so in an effort to get that public to accept things that are not true, in order that the interest of those corporations are served, in many cases to the detriment of the wellbeing of people, would certainly deserve a little niche on a Maga-Debunking website. Especially because the documentary is showing the scientific methods used by the corporations, based on decades of psychological research. Posting it on this website would help alert debunkers to recognize bunk spread by those who do so on a literally massive scale.
 

Lode

Member
Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the claimants though? I hear this a lot and wonder...

Yes, of course it should. They are convinced -or believe it, which is their right- but to convince others might take a lot more... which is understandable.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Mick, these are the main rules as you know (you might even have written them):

1. To find and expose bunk
2. To prevent bunk from forming and spreading.
3. To develop and promote efficient methods of finding, exposing, and preventing bunk
4. To create re-usable debunkings (antibunk)

On this website many issues that have been presented to the public as true are being debunked. So a very well documented report about how the corporations are telling the public things that aren't so in an effort to get that public to accept things that are not true, in order that the interest of those corporations are served, in many cases to the detriment of the wellbeing of people, would certainly deserve a little niche on a Maga-Debunking website. Especially because the documentary is showing the scientific methods used by the corporations, based on decades of psychological research. Posting it on this website would help alert debunkers to recognize bunk spread by those who do so on a literally massive scale.

There are other guidelines. Feel free to start a thread if you think you can conform to the guidelines.
 

MikeC

Closed Account
MikeC,

it does make sense that those in charge would not want to be sprayed themselves -nor their families etc.- with harmful chemicals and compounds, so unless they would believe spraying is harmless -or harmless enough to outweigh the benefits- they would be against it. Still that does not prove it's not happening.

Indeed - however it is also a logical fallacy to claim that - known as argument from ignorance - it is quite common to encounter it.

However the way to counter it is to not claim that there is no spraying - but to claim that there is not evidence that there is spraying, and since there is no such evidence the claims that it IS happening (not that it COULD BE happening) can be characterized as myth and legend.

And that is exactly what I do - if someone says to me "well you don't know that it isn't happening" then I reply exactly like that - indeed I do not know that - but there's no evidence that it IS happening so why bother about it.

Also relevant is evidence of absence - any such spraying MUST leave some evidence. There is no such evidence....therefore it is reasonable to conclude there is no such spraying.
 

Hama Neggs

Senior Member.
maybe she did discover that they are indeed spraying the air with chemicals. I would give her the benefit of the doubt also.

If she did discover that, where does she talk about how she made the discovery or show any specific evidence of it?
 

Hama Neggs

Senior Member.
Thanks Mick.

I much prefer chemtrails being just contrails of course. As anyone in his sane mind does.

I noticed that my post on using psychological knowledge about the masses and how it is being used was deleted. (It was off topic, I admit.) But since it is so well documented I find it important, and so might many others here. Can I start a new thread on that just posting the video, and if so, where would be an appropriate place?

Kristen Meghan doesn't strike me as dishonest, so she might be mistaken and misinterpreted things. But until I'm 100% sure of that I give her the benefit of the doubt. We know that there are many things governments and corporations do that they hide -or try to hide, until a whistle blower spills the beans- from the masses. And at least some of it is not exactly in the best interest of the people, to put it mildly...

The element of "doubt" in her story is because she does't provide any actual evidence to support her claims. She claimed to have done testing, but refused to show the testing methods or results. Why?
 

Lode

Member
If my memory serves me well, she talks about discovering large amounts of specific substances without the regular data referring to those substances while she worked in the military, in her function of overseeing safety issues.

But -again- I don't know if she misinterpreted her findings o not. I hope she did, so it isn't true. That's all.
 

cloudspotter

Senior Member.
If my memory serves me well, she talks about discovering large amounts of specific substances without the regular data referring to those substances while she worked in the military, in her function of overseeing safety issues.

But -again- I don't know if she misinterpreted her findings o not. I hope she did, so it isn't true. That's all.

All of that is discussed in this thread https://www.metabunk.org/threads/kristen-meghan-former-us-air-force-whistle-blower.1066/

If you have any more comments about Kristens evidence you should post them there, prevent this snow thread drifitng
 

Trigger Hippie

Senior Member.
In the continuing "fake snow" saga, Aircrap.org is now attempting to make a connection with superabsorbent polymers; Specifically Insta-Snow Powder from Steve Spangler Science. Of course, except for the color, SAP does not even remotely resemble snow.

EDIT: For me, this claim is so ridiculous on so many levels, it's hard to figure out where to begin debunking it. It's 'not even wrong' or maybe 'wronger that wrong' or just plain wrong.

sp_snow.jpg
 
Last edited:

deirdre

Senior Member.
In the continuing "fake snow" saga, Aircrap.org is now attempting to make a connection with superabsorbent polymers; Specifically Insta-Snow Powder from Steve Spangler Science. Of course, except for the color, SAP does not even remotely resemble snow.

EDIT: For me, this claim is so ridiculous on so many levels, it's hard to figure out where to begin debunking it. It's 'not even wrong' or maybe 'wronger that wrong' or just plain wrong.

oh yea that looks a lot less messy then real snow.

88452cd133931afad2cf806e87fc9ab363a1ebfc.jpg on an upnote its non toxic.
http://www.vat19.com/dvds/instasnow.cfm
 

Balance

Senior Member.
Yeah but what if one of those kiddies saw mummy or daddy burning snow once and junior knows where the lighters are kept?
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
I bet insta-snow doesn't melt the the same as snow does either. Or look and taste like water after you melt it.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Mother nature is stranger than we think:

Not really stranger, just more varied than people generally think.

 

NoParty

Senior Member.
Okay, so we all had a lot of fun in February as the science-challenged demanded
to be heard re. their declarations of non-melting "fake" snow.

It's early September now...I haven't seen retractions or apologies,
so I presume the fake snow is still blanketing Atlanta, etc. (?)

Screen Shot 2014-09-04 at 10.14.23 AM.png
 

Hevach

Senior Member.
It's early September now...I haven't seen retractions or apologies,
so I presume the fake snow is still blanketing Atlanta, etc. (?)
Some of them are still insisting they were right because reasons.

One of the reasons is a giant snow pile in Winnipeg that's still 60 feet tall and probably won't melt on its own before they start piling this year's snow on top.

Of course, most of that snow has melted (the pile was a lot bigger originally), and what melted deposited all the dirt and debris that was picked up with it into a thick insulating layer on top of the snow. Winnipeg has had this problem five times in ten years, and know how to deal with it, like breaking up the pile and spreading it out or spraying it from fire hydrants. They're confident they'll have it all melted by the end of September.

THEN we'll get those retractions and apologies. Right?
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: A Snow Test for Signs of Geoengineering, Portland Oregon Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 3
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Rory Debunked: "You must love yourself before you love another" - fake Buddha quote Quotes Debunked 7
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
FlightMuj Debunked: Lack of fingernail bruise injury proves Apollo 17 fake Conspiracy Theories 23
deirdre Debunked: Lights chasing each other carving holes in clouds (fake video, fallstreak holes) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 17
Mick West Debunked: CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: ‘We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11’ [HOAX] 9/11 12
Mick West Debunked: "Fake" live chat from the International Space Station (ISS) with Boise State Flat Earth 10
Mick West Debunked: Cargo Plane Carrying "Nukes" to Korea [French Air Display] General Discussion 5
Mick West Debunked: Donald Trump Promises to Reopen 9/11 Probe [Fake News] 9/11 4
Spiemel Fontus - self-filling water bottle (indiegogo scam campaign?) Science and Pseudoscience 185
Georgie G Debunked: SpaceX Rocket Crash Landing Anomalies General Discussion 21
Mick West Debunked: English Young Father Assaulted by Muslim Mob in Baildon, UK [White Youths] General Discussion 12
Mick West Debunked: Furious American Citizens In San Bernardino Burn Down Radical Islamic Mosque General Discussion 20
deirdre Debunked: Medical Examiner 'caught' setting up fake crime scene Sandy Hook 4
Graham2001 Debunked: 'First' FEMA Camp opens in Arizona Conspiracy Theories 7
E Debunked: Virginia Shooting Hoax Claims - Lack of visible shell casings mean fake gun Conspiracy Theories 22
Mick West Debunked: Chattanooga shooting victim fake Conspiracy Theories 6
Mick West Debunked: CyberBerkut Video Supposedly Showing Staged ISIS beheading of Foley Conspiracy Theories 37
Graham2001 Debunked: FVX Research [Fake Web Site] Conspiracy Theories 1
Mick West Debunked: The latest ISIS video of two Japanese men is a fake, shadows wrong [Perspective] Conspiracy Theories 109
Redwood Debunked: Google photos show Ottawa Parliament bullet holes are fake Conspiracy Theories 115
Mick West Debunked: Paramagnetic Paint - Color Changing Cars [Hoax: After Effects Fake] Science and Pseudoscience 13
Max Debunked: Stonehenge fake?? [Patched with concrete in the 1950s] Conspiracy Theories 66
Jason Debunked: MH17: Supposed satellite video of missile launch [Fake] Flight MH17 14
Mick West Debunked: Tail Sprayers & Fake Infrared [Contrail Gaps and Photoshop] Contrails and Chemtrails 75
Svartbjørn Debunked: Orlando Roller Coaster Fatalities [Stock Fake Photo, Swedish Coaster] General Discussion 7
derwoodii [Debunked] Jeff Rothschild. In order to finalize the New World Order we need a 3rd world war [Fake] Quotes Debunked 6
Balance Debunked: MH370 Passenger Philip Wood sends Photo/Text from Diego Garcia [Fake EXIF GPS Data] Flight MH370 142
Lode Debunked: Fake City / "US Army Trains for Martial Law In US." General Discussion 168
Mick West Debunked: CNNs Fake News Broadcasts - Charles Jaco and the Fake Live Gulf War Reports Conspiracy Theories 222
CalPolyFan Debunked: Obama Certificate of Live Birth- So Fake It Hurts Conspiracy Theories 21
Mick West Debunked: Fake photo of triangle UFO and contrail Contrails and Chemtrails 4
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 8
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 75
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top