Debunked: Chang'e-2 photos of Alien Base on Moon [Hoax]

Tony_Sigel

New Member
Watching video about ufo on nasa Apollo landing now I knew of some stuff like landing was staged "supposedly" but why what happen.? The video about secret moon base actual NASA documents. Why hasn't NASA been back on foot which is strange.... Help me someone http://www.conspiracyclub.co/2015/05/05/moon-alien-base-china-releases-image/

[post edited to add relevant claims]
upload_2015-5-5_19-58-16.png
upload_2015-5-5_19-59-51.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
I've edited your post to include the claims and what little evidence they provide for them. When you make a thread you should always include all the information you can.
But this is really just someone saying something and not really offering much reason to believe them.
I would avoid that site and others like it as they don't even put much effort into offering evidence, they just are interested in getting traffic.

The photo's a little bit interesting, but digital artifacts should be the first thing that is ruled out before jumping to conlcusions like these.
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
The image is not a picture from the Chinese orbiter at all. It is an edited version of a photo from NASA's Lunar Orbiter 3, taken in February 1967!

Original pic: https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMirrorCache/ed4ec513292b374ec0a022c92d4d40b0.jpg




The area in question is at the back right of the prominent flat plain in the centre, close to where the vertical stitching artifact crosses it.

Comparison, created by user "duhdiggitydan" on AboveTopSecret, here: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread811295/pg25#pid13535928



The field of view in those two comparison shots isn't a very good match. I'm sure someone here could knock up a better overlay comparison, but I don't have time right now.
 
Last edited:

BombDr

Senior Member.
Why hasn't NASA been back on foot which is strange....
Hi Tony,

Not strange at all really: It is very very expensive.

After Apollo finished with Apollo 17, the US government felt they had achieved their aim in beating the Soviets to the moon. Pairs of Astronauts rummaging around for moon rocks did not really achieve very much after the first couple of times except to capture the imagination. The risks of these missions was also incredibly high so perhaps they thought to quit while they were ahead.

Skylab was next, and was considerably cheaper and lower risk, followed by the Space Shuttle. The Space Shuttle was intended to be a cost effective method of space exploration and was commercialised to launch satellites. It didn't quite turn out to be commercially viable, but relatively reliable.

Its pretty much all a matter of funding, political motivation and risk.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
It's an exact match for the older image, just a bit of blur and contrast, and then the structures added digitally.


The story has been kicking around various sites for a while (since Feb 2012), some attribute it to "The Canadian", which is actually just a news aggregator site that anyone can "publish" on:
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/ufo_extraterrestrials/2012/02/23/3060.html
This particular "The Canadian" story was "compiled" by Scott Waring, and, as seen above it uses as a source Scott Waring, and the link now redirects to his site "UFO Sightings Daily"
http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/2012/02/alien-moon-base-captured-by-change-2.html

Which in turn references a video by "Alien Disclosure Group (UK)",

There is no "report", the quoted text is just from the description of the YouTube video, which was later updated to also say:
 
Last edited:

Sagittarius

Member
Tony, if there really were an 'alien base' on the far side of the Moon, don't you think the LRO would have spotted it long before now, with its superb images, the best of which have a resolution of 0.5m/pixel?
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Tony, if there really were an 'alien base' on the far side of the Moon, don't you think the LRO would have spotted it long before now, with its superb images, the best of which have a resolution of 0.5m/pixel?
This is a very good point.

That Lunar Orbiter photo was frame 3085: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/frame/?3085

The principal point location is:

You can put these coordinates into the LROC Quickmap viewer: http://target.lroc.asu.edu/q3/

and quickly find the relevant area.

This is the place where the "base" has been added on the LO photo:

upload_2015-5-5_19-53-43.png

and this is the same area on the LROC map. Obviously the perspective is different but you can see the same features, including the line of three craters at the left and the horizontal ridge with a crater on top, in the foreground in front of the hills. Note that this view is at 64 metres per pixel (may be slightly rescaled on your screen).


upload_2015-5-5_19-55-39.png


Zooming in further on the exact location of the "base", we can get right down to 50cm per pixel and find nothing but craters and rocks:

upload_2015-5-5_19-59-20.png


Link to location on LROC: http://target.lroc.asu.edu/q3/?proj...c_bw_v1_par,F,100;wac_bw_v1_plus_nacs,T,100;=
 

Attachments

Hevach

Senior Member.
Why hasn't NASA been back on foot which is strange
BombDr touched on this, but the big problem with Cold War era space exploration is that both countries governments were on different pages than their space programs, but everybody seems to think they were on the same page which none of them actually were.

The US government was in it for national pride - they wanted to beat the Soviets to something. Anything, really, the moon was convenient but they'd settle for less if they could or shoot for more if they couldn't. Science was expensive but pride was priceless.
The US space program wanted to do manned and robotic interplanetary exploration.

The Soviet government mainly wanted weapon delivery systems and intelligence.
The Soviet space program wanted orbital construction and long term sustainable presence.

In a way, both programs were a product of the German rocketry program, which had the same disconnect. The German government wanted long range terror weapons, while the program runners wanted space travel and advanced aircraft.


The problem all around is that when the desires of the government are met or change the support level for the program suddenly evaporates, and as budgets are redrawn year to year that money goes to other programs. Only the Russian program survived that process, and even there just barely - their unmanned programs gutted as badly as NASA's manned ones, their interplanetary programs delayed into the distant maybe just like NASA's, etc.
 

NoParty

Senior Member.
Milton Cooper, a Naval Intelligence Officer tells us that not only does the Alien Moon Base exist but the U.S. Naval Intelligence Community refers to the Alien Moon Base as “Luna,” [/EX]
Okay, I'm plenty cheesed-off, but not because our stupid government did this behind our backs,
or that we got troll'd by a 48 year-old photo.

No, I'm mostly mad because our fancy-pants (remember their ritzy $640 toilet seats?) "Military Intelligence"
wizards dreamt up "Luna" for our alien moon base! :rolleyes: Seriously guys? How about a little creative effort
when you're subverting democracy?!? It's like naming your new puppy: "Dog." Unacceptable!



Any truth to the rumor that "Nutz Over Chocolate" is the name of the most popular gay Luna Bar?
 
Apologies for the thread necromancy but I came across this while researching a debunk post for someone who has recently posted a video making this claim at infowars.

The Lunar Orbiter photograph in question appears in 'The moon as viewed by lunar orbiter', of which I have an actual copy dating from 1970.

This is the relevant part of the image from my copy:



I also have two lunar atlases from the same period that mostly consisted of images taken by terrestrial telescopes, and no factories can be found in there either!

China's actual data are now available as detailed here:

http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs/2016/01221450-china-invites-public-on-board.html
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 1
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 13
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Obama called Michelle "Michael" in a speech. (Referring to Michael Mullen Jr) Quotes Debunked 0
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
Rory Debunked: The Lunar Cycle affects birth rates Health and Quackery 26
Rory Debunked: Study shows link between menstrual cycle and the moon Health and Quackery 30
novatron Debunked: California Wildfires Match the Exactly Path of the Proposed Rail System Wildfires 3
Rory Debunked: "You must love yourself before you love another" - fake Buddha quote Quotes Debunked 7
W Debunked: Qanon claims there have been 51k sealed indictments filed this year. Current Events 11
K Debunked: Audio of David Rockefeller "leaked" speech in 1991 [Audio Simulation] General Discussion 2
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
Mick West Debunked: XYO Device Replacing GPS, Saving $2 Million a Day General Discussion 23
Mick West Debunked: "Tip Top" as a QAnon Clue from Trump [He's said it before] Conspiracy Theories 3
Whitebeard Debunked: Nibiru FOUND? Mysterious gigantic rogue planet spotted lurking outside our solar system Science and Pseudoscience 1
Mick West Debunked: "There Exists a Shadowy Government" — Daniel Inouye Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: Delta Lambda Compression General Discussion 16
MisterB Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
JFDee Debunked: Wernher von Braun confirmed that rockets can't leave earth Conspiracy Theories 23
Mick West Debunked: Missing $21 Trillion / $6.5 Trillion / $2.3 Trillion - Journal Vouchers Conspiracy Theories 33
MikeG Debunked: Obamacare Article 54 (Satire FB Page) General Discussion 2
Mick West Debunked: "Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth’s Surface:" [Stray Light] Contrails and Chemtrails 30
Astro Debunked: Apollo Lunar Module Hatch Too Small for Spacesuit Science and Pseudoscience 0
Mick West Debunked: NIST's Lack of Explanation for WTC7 Freefall [They Have One - Column Buckling] 9/11 38
Jedo Debunked: WTC7 was the only building not on the WTC block that had a fire on 9/11 9/11 0
Mick West Debunked: Thermite Slag on WTC beams [Oxy Cutting Slag] 9/11 2
Mick West Debunked: The WTC 9/11 Angle Cut Column. [Not Thermite, Cut Later] 9/11 137
Mick West Debunked: AE911Truth's Analysis of Slag Residue from WTC Debris 9/11 20
Dan Wilson Debunked: Steven Crowder: The AIDS epidemic was a hoax Health and Quackery 9
Dan Wilson Debunked: Infowars product damages sperm Health and Quackery 2
Mick West Debunked: Corbett Report Targeted by Google/Youtube Conspiracy Theories 37
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top