Debunked: Chang'e-2 photos of Alien Base on Moon [Hoax]

Tony_Sigel

New Member
Watching video about ufo on nasa Apollo landing now I knew of some stuff like landing was staged "supposedly" but why what happen.? The video about secret moon base actual NASA documents. Why hasn't NASA been back on foot which is strange.... Help me someone http://www.conspiracyclub.co/2015/05/05/moon-alien-base-china-releases-image/

[post edited to add relevant claims]
upload_2015-5-5_19-58-16.png
upload_2015-5-5_19-59-51.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
I've edited your post to include the claims and what little evidence they provide for them. When you make a thread you should always include all the information you can.
But this is really just someone saying something and not really offering much reason to believe them.
I would avoid that site and others like it as they don't even put much effort into offering evidence, they just are interested in getting traffic.

The photo's a little bit interesting, but digital artifacts should be the first thing that is ruled out before jumping to conlcusions like these.
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
The image is not a picture from the Chinese orbiter at all. It is an edited version of a photo from NASA's Lunar Orbiter 3, taken in February 1967!

Original pic: https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMirrorCache/ed4ec513292b374ec0a022c92d4d40b0.jpg




The area in question is at the back right of the prominent flat plain in the centre, close to where the vertical stitching artifact crosses it.

Comparison, created by user "duhdiggitydan" on AboveTopSecret, here: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread811295/pg25#pid13535928



The field of view in those two comparison shots isn't a very good match. I'm sure someone here could knock up a better overlay comparison, but I don't have time right now.
 
Last edited:

BombDr

Senior Member.
Why hasn't NASA been back on foot which is strange....

Hi Tony,

Not strange at all really: It is very very expensive.

After Apollo finished with Apollo 17, the US government felt they had achieved their aim in beating the Soviets to the moon. Pairs of Astronauts rummaging around for moon rocks did not really achieve very much after the first couple of times except to capture the imagination. The risks of these missions was also incredibly high so perhaps they thought to quit while they were ahead.

Skylab was next, and was considerably cheaper and lower risk, followed by the Space Shuttle. The Space Shuttle was intended to be a cost effective method of space exploration and was commercialised to launch satellites. It didn't quite turn out to be commercially viable, but relatively reliable.

Its pretty much all a matter of funding, political motivation and risk.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
It's an exact match for the older image, just a bit of blur and contrast, and then the structures added digitally.


The story has been kicking around various sites for a while (since Feb 2012), some attribute it to "The Canadian", which is actually just a news aggregator site that anyone can "publish" on:
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/ufo_extraterrestrials/2012/02/23/3060.html
This particular "The Canadian" story was "compiled" by Scott Waring, and, as seen above it uses as a source Scott Waring, and the link now redirects to his site "UFO Sightings Daily"
http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/2012/02/alien-moon-base-captured-by-change-2.html

Which in turn references a video by "Alien Disclosure Group (UK)",

There is no "report", the quoted text is just from the description of the YouTube video, which was later updated to also say:
 
Last edited:

Sagittarius

Member
Tony, if there really were an 'alien base' on the far side of the Moon, don't you think the LRO would have spotted it long before now, with its superb images, the best of which have a resolution of 0.5m/pixel?
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Tony, if there really were an 'alien base' on the far side of the Moon, don't you think the LRO would have spotted it long before now, with its superb images, the best of which have a resolution of 0.5m/pixel?
This is a very good point.

That Lunar Orbiter photo was frame 3085: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/frame/?3085

The principal point location is:

You can put these coordinates into the LROC Quickmap viewer: http://target.lroc.asu.edu/q3/

and quickly find the relevant area.

This is the place where the "base" has been added on the LO photo:

upload_2015-5-5_19-53-43.png

and this is the same area on the LROC map. Obviously the perspective is different but you can see the same features, including the line of three craters at the left and the horizontal ridge with a crater on top, in the foreground in front of the hills. Note that this view is at 64 metres per pixel (may be slightly rescaled on your screen).


upload_2015-5-5_19-55-39.png


Zooming in further on the exact location of the "base", we can get right down to 50cm per pixel and find nothing but craters and rocks:

upload_2015-5-5_19-59-20.png


Link to location on LROC: http://target.lroc.asu.edu/q3/?proj...c_bw_v1_par,F,100;wac_bw_v1_plus_nacs,T,100;=
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-5-5_19-55-11.png
    upload_2015-5-5_19-55-11.png
    517.4 KB · Views: 372

Hevach

Senior Member.
Why hasn't NASA been back on foot which is strange
BombDr touched on this, but the big problem with Cold War era space exploration is that both countries governments were on different pages than their space programs, but everybody seems to think they were on the same page which none of them actually were.

The US government was in it for national pride - they wanted to beat the Soviets to something. Anything, really, the moon was convenient but they'd settle for less if they could or shoot for more if they couldn't. Science was expensive but pride was priceless.
The US space program wanted to do manned and robotic interplanetary exploration.

The Soviet government mainly wanted weapon delivery systems and intelligence.
The Soviet space program wanted orbital construction and long term sustainable presence.

In a way, both programs were a product of the German rocketry program, which had the same disconnect. The German government wanted long range terror weapons, while the program runners wanted space travel and advanced aircraft.


The problem all around is that when the desires of the government are met or change the support level for the program suddenly evaporates, and as budgets are redrawn year to year that money goes to other programs. Only the Russian program survived that process, and even there just barely - their unmanned programs gutted as badly as NASA's manned ones, their interplanetary programs delayed into the distant maybe just like NASA's, etc.
 

NoParty

Senior Member.
Milton Cooper, a Naval Intelligence Officer tells us that not only does the Alien Moon Base exist but the U.S. Naval Intelligence Community refers to the Alien Moon Base as “Luna,” [/EX]

Okay, I'm plenty cheesed-off, but not because our stupid government did this behind our backs,
or that we got troll'd by a 48 year-old photo.

No, I'm mostly mad because our fancy-pants (remember their ritzy $640 toilet seats?) "Military Intelligence"
wizards dreamt up "Luna" for our alien moon base! :rolleyes: Seriously guys? How about a little creative effort
when you're subverting democracy?!? It's like naming your new puppy: "Dog." Unacceptable!



Any truth to the rumor that "Nutz Over Chocolate" is the name of the most popular gay Luna Bar?
 
Apologies for the thread necromancy but I came across this while researching a debunk post for someone who has recently posted a video making this claim at infowars.

The Lunar Orbiter photograph in question appears in 'The moon as viewed by lunar orbiter', of which I have an actual copy dating from 1970.

This is the relevant part of the image from my copy:



I also have two lunar atlases from the same period that mostly consisted of images taken by terrestrial telescopes, and no factories can be found in there either!

China's actual data are now available as detailed here:

http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs/2016/01221450-china-invites-public-on-board.html
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 8
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 75
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 8
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: "Nancy Pelosi's long time Chief of Staff is a key executive at Dominion Voting" Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: Wisconsin Turnout 89% Impossible High [Actually 72%] Election 2020 1
Mick West Debunked: Video of Poll Worker "Filling In" Ballots. Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top