Claim: Correlations Between Media Preference and Coronavirus Infection Rates

Critical Thinker

Senior Member.
Throughout Metabunk are references to the importance of having reliable sources of information and that various outlets like Infowars, NaturalNews, RussiaToday, Sputnik and others often make false claims to support a political narrative. Within the US people have responded differently to the Coronavirus pandemic based upon where they get their News from, that often is a reflection of their political alignment.

The local perspectives on the Coronavirus re-openings and the compliance with measures recommended by the scientific community in one of the studies cited in the article below found:

The authors used anonymous location data from millions of cellphones to explore how the popularity of Fox News in a given Zip code related to social distancing practices there. By March 15, they found, a 10 percent increase in Fox News viewership within a Zip code reduced its residents’ propensity to stay home, in compliance with public health guidelines, by about 1.3 percentage points.

From the WashingtonPost: New research explores how conservative media misinformation may have intensified the severity of the pandemic

In recent weeks, three studies have focused on conservative media’s role in fostering confusion about the seriousness of the coronavirus. Taken together, they paint a picture of a media ecosystem that amplifies misinformation, entertains conspiracy theories and discourages audiences from taking concrete steps to protect themselves and others.


The end result, according to one of the studies, is that infection and mortality rates are higher in places where one pundit who initially downplayed the severity of the pandemic — Fox News’s Sean Hannity — reaches the largest audiences.


“We are receiving an incredible number of studies and solid data showing that consuming far-right media and social media content was strongly associated with low concern about the virus at the onset of the pandemic,” said Irene Pasquetto, chief editor of the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, which published one of the studies.
Excerpts linking to the studies:

Misinformation and conspiracy theories
In April, Kathleen Hall Jamieson of the Annenberg Public Policy Center and Dolores Albarracin of the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign published a peer-reviewed study examining how Americans’ media diets affected their beliefs about the coronavirus.

Beliefs lead to actions
A working paper posted by the National Bureau of Economic Research in May examined whether these incorrect beliefs affected real-world behavior.
How conservative media consumers’ behavior could worsen the pandemic
Another recent working paper, by economists at the University of Chicago and other institutions, similarly finds that Fox News viewers are less likely to comply with public health guidelines than consumers of other media. But their paper takes the analysis two steps further: It finds that Fox viewers aren’t a monolith, with fans of some media personalities acting distinctly from others. It also provides evidence that those behavioral differences are contributing to the spread of the coronavirus and mortality rate of covid-19 the disease it causes, in certain areas.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
By March 15,
at the onset of the pandemic,” said Irene Pasquetto, chief editor of the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, which published one of the studies.
is that infection and mortality rates are higher in places where one pundit who initially downplayed the severity of the pandemic
Considering the blue west coast got hit first, then the blue Tri-state (NY,NJ, CT),Boston... and had crazy high numbers (higher than current numbers).. This article smells fishy. Although i guess it is possible the minorities in NYC and the rich socialites in Westport and the peoples of NJ prefer to watch Hannity, but i doubt it.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
hhmmm...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ariels...news-slams-findings-as-reckless/#32e93ae579fb

another tid bit regarding the University of Chicagos working paper:
https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/BFI_WP_202044.pdf
page 6
Tucker didnt see it differently. That's not what Conservatives meant by the coronavirus hoax.
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/democratic-ad-twists-trumps-hoax-comment/





Don't get me wrong, i do believe Tucker's fear mongering and conspiracy theories likely made his viewers more paranoid, i just know that University of Chicago paper didn't actually prove anything (as they say in the paper itself).
There are too many reasons "why" for me to get into, and wouldn't want to rob others of the fun of analysis... besides, the OP doesnt actually give any claims of evidence. Just claims. So ... that which is presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
* the very first quote sort of gives data as evidence, but since WP is behind a paywall and i have no idea which "authors" that quote refers to, not the University of Chicago- i did try that one-, I'm too bored now to look for it now. That university of chicaco working paper is insanely long!




Hannity was actually fairly reasonable, giving accurate facts and Tucker was inciting hate against China.

Hannity as quoted in the paper https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/BFI_WP_202044.pdf
true.
true



Tucker:

https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-ne...us-theory-which-his-medical-expert-guest-shot



article written by Tucker March 12
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-racist-chinese-coronavirus-identity-politics
 

Critical Thinker

Senior Member.
The mod created this thread with the name "Claim: Correlations Between Media Preference and Coronavirus Infection Rates". The Washington Post article is titled, " New research explores how conservative media misinformation may have intensified the severity of the pandemic ".

I fail to see where you have debunked the claim. I do see you [removed for politeness] discounted these studies as not being evidence. You could look at the studies; the methodology, the data collected, how they analyzed the data, and what conclusions they have drawn from that study... and if there is a flaw, you should let the researchers and the World know of your own research that debunks the studies so that they can retract them from the scientific journals where they are published.

the OP doesnt actually give any claims of evidence. Just claims. So ... that which is presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Landru

Moderator
Staff member
The mod created this thread with the name "Claim: Correlations Between Media Preference and Coronavirus Infection Rates". The Washington Post article is titled, " New research explores how conservative media misinformation may have intensified the severity of the pandemic ".

I fail to see where you have debunked the claim. I do see you cavalierly discounted these studies as not being evidence. You could look at the studies; the methodology, the data collected, how they analyzed the data, and what conclusions they have drawn from that study... and if there is a flaw, you should let the researchers and the World know of your own research that debunks the studies so that they can retract them from the scientific journals where they are published.
I'm going to step into this conversation to reiterate a point. Be polite. Adjectives such as cavalierly stray from that principle. This applies to everyone.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
The mod created this thread with the name "Claim: Correlations Between Media Preference and Coronavirus Infection Rates". The Washington Post article is titled, " New research explores how conservative media misinformation may have intensified the severity of the pandemic ".

I fail to see where you have debunked the claim. I do see you [removed for politeness] discounted these studies as not being evidence. You could look at the studies; the methodology, the data collected, how they analyzed the data, and what conclusions they have drawn from that study... and if there is a flaw, you should let the researchers and the World know of your own research that debunks the studies so that they can retract them from the scientific journals where they are published.
i only looked at the University of Chicago study. they already know enough of their flaws and state them in the working paper.
as far as a 'debunk' of that paper, we all know correlation (and that word is used ALOT in that paper) does not equal causation. so what's to debunk really?
they also don't give us any of the data we would need to check their "conclusions". it's a silly premise anyway... people in nursing homes (the highest fatality rates in the early epidemic) without proper PPE had no choice in the matter even if they did watch Hannity.

just saying...
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
I do see you [removed for politeness] discounted these studies as not being evidence.
oh and you are welcome to give me the evidence from that study that i might have missed. i wasnt able to find any raw data. i wasnt even able to find an "n" number for Hannity watchers vs "n" numbers for Tucker watchers. vs "n" numbers for CNN watchers etc. I also didnt see any locations they used or mortality figures.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
ok the first quote in OP isnt from the first paper either. the only "peer reviewed" paper.
note: apparently Harvard Kennedy School started their own journal in january 2020. https://shorensteincenter.org/announcing-hks-misinformation-review/

add: this paper actually gives needed data and numbers.

but doesn't seem like alot of people were anti-handwashing social distancing. (survey taken between March 3-March 8, roughly 475 conservatives and 475 liberals)

I didnt even start social distancing until March 3rd and we had the Westchester outbreak near by. and all my friends (lib and conservative) thought i was being paranoid. which maybe i was as they went on as normal till mid march at least and none of them got sick.
DiBlasio (NY Dem)was telling people mid-march go to the bar, go to the movies. <the movie thing was March 2nd

I'm actually surprised so many people responded positively to that question.

1593553950433.png


and according to that paper
getting news from Google News, or Yahoo News, is worse than listenign to Rush Limbaugh as far as handwashing and social distancing. and FB and twitter are better than reading liberal media. so that's all a bit weird and surprising.



edit add: o_O
 
Last edited:

Mechanik

Active Member
I was preparing a post on all three papers and the Washington Post article, but apparently I used up my WaPo views and can no longer see the article without signing up. Since I can’t prove that particular point, I’ll instead post this study:
Pew Research Study On Media Bias
The Washington Post is (or was, since I haven’t seen a more recent update) almost in exact balance with Fox News around the average with regards to conservative vs. liberal. The facts of the OP studies may, or may not, be robust, but the WaPo conclusions are not necessarily unbiased.

Please don’t mistake my intent here, wish I could quote WaPo directly, but let me just say that relying on WaPo for unbiased reporting is somewhat akin to relying on Fox. By the way, I deliberately linked to the WaPo article about the Pew study instead of the base study.

If you disagree with me, please quote the exact words you disagree with.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
but let me just say that relying on WaPo for unbiased reporting
You can tell how biased the papers are too if you read them. esp the 2nd and third linked in OP. The quotes they chose make no sense in the timeframe they were uttered and ignore liberal media personalities saying the exact same stuff (or Fauchi saying the exact same stuff).

for instance the 2nd paper there says on March 10th laura Ingalls says:
how is that echoing a sentiment of low risk?

it says of CNN (even though i posted above Cooper Anderson calling it a flu long after Hannity did!
Fox had all those guys on too.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
M Claim: UFO performs sharp maneuver after laser pointer directly hits craft UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 17
L Claim: NASA is doctoring an image [Scanner Dirt] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 7
Z.W. Wolf Claim: Martin Gugino Was Using a "Police Tracker." Conspiracy Theories 42
Rory Claim: A dog in Manchester could sense its owner's return by unknown means UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 21
jarlrmai Claim: UFO following jet into landing at JFK on 11/11/19 UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 15
Dingo Claim: U.S. Covid-19 Deaths are being Artificially Inflated Coronavirus COVID-19 38
W Claim: The Heart Is Not A Pump Health and Quackery 6
J Another sun path claim Flat Earth 4
J Claim sun paths prove flat earth Flat Earth 41
R Claim: Apollo 15-17 Live TV Feed - Antenna signal would be interrupted from all the violent shaking when Astronauts touch the buggy General Discussion 26
Rory Claim: Spanish flu caused by radio waves Coronavirus COVID-19 3
J [False] Claim that Scale Model of 2017 Eclipse Disproves the Heliocentric Model Flat Earth 29
Rory Claim: UK Coronavirus Bill (HC Bill 122) means "bad things" Coronavirus COVID-19 9
Mick West Claim: China Mobile loses 8.116 Million subscribers because of Coronavirus Coronavirus COVID-19 2
Agent K Claim: Harvey Weinstein has coronavirus Coronavirus COVID-19 9
Mick West Claim: Julian Assange offered pardon to "Lie" for Trump Current Events 20
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Wiggles Claim: Distant Objects Being Obscured Is Due To the "Mirror Blocking" Effect of Inferior Mirages Flat Earth 7
Mick West Claim: Section 13.1 on Vaccine Inserts Removed to Hide that Vaccines not Tested to Cause Cancer Conspiracy Theories 7
Rory Claim: footage of Great South Bay Bridge supports flat earth Flat Earth 11
mudr0 Claim: Australia was not visible from the moon for Apollo 11 Broadcasts Conspiracy Theories 7
Z.W. Wolf Claim: Moon Passing The Meridian Disproves Globe Earth Flat Earth 0
Z.W. Wolf Claim: Seeing The Same Stars All Year Disproves Globe Earth Flat Earth 20
Mick West Claim: Fertility Clinics are a new thing (David Icke) Conspiracy Theories 12
Rory Claim: Nasa' in Hebrew means "to deceive" Flat Earth 11
Leifer Claim: magnetic dust on cars proves chemtrail fallout Contrails and Chemtrails 11
Neil Obstat Claim: zooming in on setting sun proves flat earth Flat Earth 23
Marin B Claim: Passenger luggage limited to make room for chemical tanks Contrails and Chemtrails 15
MikeG Claim: DC officials are "flocking" to "Doomsday Camps" Conspiracy Theories 4
StarGazer Convex Earth Claim: Ships Disappear Below The Horizon Due To A Optical Phenomena Flat Earth 3
Nth Claim: 146 Mile Microwave Transmission Proves Flat Earth Flat Earth 26
FlightMuj Apollo 12 photo analysis shows Sun as bulb [claim] Conspiracy Theories 19
inkwell American Airlines Flight 77 Missing from Bureau of Transportation Departure Report 9/11 12
ConfusedHominid Need Debunking (Claim): Metabunk Curve Calculator Does Not Calculate for Angular Size Flat Earth 13
derwoodii Claim Melania Trump has a double, will the real 1st lady please stand up Conspiracy Theories 11
StarGazer Claim: First Image of Space Taken from V-2 Rocket Proves the Earth is Flat Flat Earth 17
Z.W. Wolf Claim: The Moon's Shadow During The Solar Eclipse Disproves Sphere Earth Flat Earth 97
B Claim: Flu vaccine from multi-dose vials Use Too Much Mercury Health and Quackery 19
SR1419 Claim: 757s cant dump fuel. (True) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
ki_cz Claim: Satellite imagery showing 'sheet' of contrails Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Mick West AE911 Truth Forced to Claim Plasco Collapse is an Inside Job 9/11 336
vaccine papers Claim: flu vaccine increases risk of non-influenza infection Health and Quackery 8
Rory Claim: Japanese man puts animals to sleep with chi UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 23
MikeC Claim: FAA conspiring with Police to limit news access to Black Rock General Discussion 3
derwoodii Claim The seabed around Kaikoura, New Zealand has risen by up to 1.8 m earthquake General Discussion 20
Abishua Claim: water in moonlight cools faster than water not in moonlight [False] Science and Pseudoscience 160
MikeC Claim: New Zealand quakes man made...... Conspiracy Theories 4
TEEJ Claim of "UFO" interacting with "Chemtrail", Paris, France, 28th September 2016 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 2
Provemewrong Explained: Why flying isn't impossible on a globe Flat Earth 106
S Claim: Russian radar would have picked up MH17 missile Flight MH17 15
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top