I work in So. Louisiana, and showed John Massaria's responses to a born Cajun. He said, "Dat guoy really is crawfishin'." What he saw is what all of us and anyone else can see. John has been caught doing something dishonest. He is crawfishin', the term comes from actions a crawfish makes to escape, he moves backwards.
We have seen a performance from John seen time and time again. Once confronted with facts which don't agree with what the chemtrail promoter was trying to say, he starts backpedaling, crawfishin'. He stops claiming anything at all like he did before, he starts complaining about ordinary stuff, not the global conspiracy he did before . He thinks we won't notice. He actually thinks we won't notice. We noticed, John.
Then he acts all innocent, speaking about passenger jet pollution when all the while in his video Dane Wigington is claiming that MILITARY jets are spraying. Dane has NEVER said that passenger jets sprayed anything, to my knowledge. Why did you show passenger jets then, John? Where are all the military jets Dane is speaking about?
You thought we wouldn't notice? We noticed, John.
So then John tries the cigarette smoking gambit, a distraction away from his slide show. Cigarette smoking is bad for you, right? He thins this makes his case stronger, maybe he can at least say something true, huh?
You thought we wouldn't notice? We noticed, John.
So then John brings out the Case Orange paper, written by the anonymous whomever. Yes we read it, John, almost three years ago, probably before you did, John. It tries to use the same stale tactics you are using. It says that "spraying" is happening, but then goes on to speak of almost nothing but ordinary contrails.
It would be very funny to see them crawfish like you do except that they got caught out citing a couple of hoaxes like the "Ontario Weather Service", which is a
joke site run by a 20-something make-believe meteorologist who never got past high school. You thought Case Orange was something new John? No, it is something very old, John. Pointing towards it might seem to give you a veneer of credibility, but once seen in its entirety, it is clear that the Case Orange report contains no support at all for the idea of the white lines as "chemtrails spraying", only for contrails.
You thought we wouldn't notice? We noticed, John.
What is really noticeable about the way you behaved here is that we can clearly see you aren't ready to admit that you were wrong to make the video the way you did. But you did in every way possible dilute down everything in an effort to avoid responsibility for doing it. You weakened it all so far down that it became a farce, a joke, a laugh. Nothing you said here bears any resemblance to support of "chemtrails spraying" If this is the way an "Indigo Child" behaves, you've got a lot of growing up to do.
BTW, Mick's questions deserve answers, because he was always polite to the extreme, and his questions really got down to the meat and bones of the issue.
Give them a try, please.
Just to let you know where Dane Wigington has really gone wrong, here is what you need to know, if you have any dispute withwhat is in these two threads, bring it on:
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/61...ot-points-regarding-geoengineering?highlight=
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/89...et-Snow”-Is-Now-Often-The-Norm?highlight=dane
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/137-Debunked-Shasta-Snow-and-Water-Aluminum-Tests?highlight=dane