By definition, you cannot see anything 'nano' with you eyes.
More stuff from old threads:
http://www.aafp.org/afp/2001/1215/p1981.html
http://www.txid.org/?page_id=23
https://picasaweb.google.com/morgellonswatch/NotMorgellons?fgl=true&pli=1&fgl=true
http://morgellonswatch.com/2006/04/11/fibers-are-everywhere/
http://conniehwangdesign.com/proj_artmuseum.php
Please note that Mr carnicom has no idea what he is doing in regards to science, or anything really.
his page of cell cultures is nothing more than non sterile dishes of various undocumented bacteria and bread mold, subjected to arbitrary tests which are conducted in an unscientific manner. ive taken his data to several groups of professional and amateur chemists and mycologists and they wouldnt even help debunk it because it was so awful.. i was told three times they didnt see it a good use of time because it was so obviously flawed and didnt see the point. clearly they didnt expect anyone to ever take it seriously.
qualified professionals acting as moderators at sciencemadness told me it was bellow the quality of work they see when dealing with 'clandestine' chemists on their forum. i would have to agree.
--
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/424-What-is-Carnicom-Doing-here?highlight=carnicom,+lab
you can tell from his obvious lack of control units, environmental/contamination controls, reproducible tests, and experiment quality that he is not performing science. Nothing else really matters beyond that. if the method is flawed, nothing he has to say about it matters. all the spectroscope stuff is hogwash. he only takes spectrum data when the sky is flooded with the color of light he is looking for. all things a true researcher would predict and control for....
now aside from what little there is to show of what he actually does, there is ALOT of words, words that seem to say alot, but actually dont. they sound complicated and sciencey, hell he has some pages in there that for a moment seem beyond my grasp(until you notice it is being used out of context), but to the informed, they mean nothing and sound childish and out of touch. this is intentional on his part id have to say. He is skipping whole swaths of the scientific method.
i am trying not to be overly critical or insulting in this post but its just really hard not to be when the quality of his 'work' is just so poor and the text he produces has about as much correlation to his 'tests' as a fairy tale. I wouldnt let him grow tomatoes or shitakes for me, nor would i let him brew me an ale.. all hobbies of mine, and task in which i employ tighter variable and contamination control than he does in his 'research'......
id please ask you to refer to the
www.morgellonswatch.com website for info on MGD(not the comments...), and to just ignore anything Mr carnicom has to say. nearly every bit if info you will come across has already been talked about and covered and is probably on that site. to repost it all here would do you a disservice when its already in one nice place.