Artemis Moon Mission 2026

1776331760957.jpeg


The hatch isn't on the same side as the docking windows (which are facing away from the camera here, in the slightly wider gap between the top balloons). It also has an inflatable ring around the base and five airbags around the docking tunnel to keep it upright and improve visibility.
 
Additionally, based on the widely circulated video (BBC, New York Times, MSN etc.) of the opening of the hatch from the perspective of the extraction team, there are other issues, not yet mentioned, too.
bbc.co.uk/news/videos/clyxxnz97wxo
Artemis recovery.jpg


fake.jpg


  • Grab rails that don't exist.
  • Hatch opening the wrong way (hinge on left instead of the right).
  • Surface material looking nothing like the real thing.

It looks like an AI image largely based on an Apollo capsule, such as that of Apollo 11 here in the National Air and Space Museum, that includes very similar features to the image circulating, that don't appear on the Orion capsule.
ids.si.edu/ids/deliveryService?id=NASM-NASM2022-05013-000003&max_w=900
NASM-NASM2022-05013-000003.jpg


Editing this post to say that looking at the Apollo capsule and the posted image, it might not even be an AI generated image, but just Photoshopped.
 
Last edited:
Additionally, based on the widely circulated video (BBC, New York Times, MSN etc.) of the opening of the hatch from the perspective of the extraction team, there are other issues, not yet mentioned, too.
bbc.co.uk/news/videos/clyxxnz97wxo
View attachment 89709

View attachment 89710

  • Grab rails that don't exist.
  • Hatch opening the wrong way (hinge on left instead of the right).
  • Surface material looking nothing like the real thing.

It looks like an AI image largely based on an Apollo capsule, such as that of Apollo 11 here in the National Air and Space Museum, that includes very similar features to the image circulating, that don't appear on the Orion capsule.
ids.si.edu/ids/deliveryService?id=NASM-NASM2022-05013-000003&max_w=900
View attachment 89711

Editing this post to say that looking at the Apollo capsule and the posted image, it might not even be an AI generated image, but just Photoshopped.
In which case I take back my comment about the grab rail - the Apollo designers made the same blunder!

1776337675124.png
 
Most of the command modules have a handle there - all of them from 9 forward have it, but 7 and 8 do not. It's present on recovery pictures as well so it wasn't added for display.

Not sure why it was omitted from 7 and 8, as it was on the drop test module, which just had dead weights inside instead of equipment and didn't even have a working hatch. I can't find images of the hatch side of Apollo 1 except during assembly and one image taken after it was disassembled - the photo of the interior just barely includes the hatch frame, the handle it it's there would be out of frame. NASA has always been extremely secretive about the wreckage of CM-12, only the hatch has been displayed to the public and there was even talk of entombing the entire thing in concrete at LC-34.

Anyway, that panel wasn't meant to be removed. Apollo didn't really do serviceable parts - if something broke it stayed broke and they had to hope it wasn't too important to get home.
 
Back
Top