A good (unintended) question from a chemtrail believer

TWCobra

Senior Member.
From Madisonstar Moons page, an awesome photo of a Russian Air Force Bison bomber being air to air refuelled, most probably from an IL76.

Both are con trailing heavily. The question asked, rather eloquently, from one of Madison's followers should give all chemtrail believers pause. See below.

image.jpg

Why indeed would a pilot sit directly behind another as it dumped "toxic" chemicals, or compounds like aluminium oxide which would abrade their own aircraft? Why indeed?
 
From Madisonstar Moons page, an awesome photo of a Russian Air Force Bison bomber being air to air refuelled, most probably from an IL76.

Both are con trailing heavily. The question asked, rather eloquently, from one of Madison's followers should give all chemtrail believers pause. See below.

image.jpg

Why indeed would a pilot sit directly behind another as it dumped "toxic" chemicals, or compounds like aluminium oxide which would abrade their own aircraft? Why indeed?
How old is that photo, is that recent because the plane looks a bit outdated?
 
How old is that photo, is that recent because the plane looks a bit outdated?
http://englishrussia.com/2013/07/22/russian-bear-in-the-air/
The Tupolev Tu-95 (NATO reporting name: Bear) is a large, four-engine turboprop-powered strategic bomber and missile platform. First flown in 1952, the Tu-95 entered service with the Soviet Union in 1956 and is expected to serve the Russian Air Force until at least 2040.
Content from External Source




The tanker here is an IL-76. Notice the middle fuel line is offset, matching what we see in the photos.

 
Last edited:
Is it typical to have condensation on the window like that at that altitude. Shouldn't water freeze up there?

It very well could be fuel, when we refuel with our centerline drogue it is common to get fuel on the air refueling compartment's sighting window since the receiver's probe doesn't always get a good seat in the basket.
 
Yes Bear not Bison. My mistake. They are not the actual names, but NATO code words. B for bomber.
 
From Madisonstar Moons page, an awesome photo of a Russian Air Force Bison bomber being air to air refuelled, most probably from an IL76.

Both are con trailing heavily. The question asked, rather eloquently, from one of Madison's followers should give all chemtrail believers pause. See below.

image.jpg

Why indeed would a pilot sit directly behind another as it dumped "toxic" chemicals, or compounds like aluminium oxide which would abrade their own aircraft? Why indeed?

That's a heck of good question. That photo contains great anti-chemtrail evidence, but apparently that goes right over their heads.
 
That's a heck of good question. That photo contains great anti-chemtrail evidence, but apparently that goes right over their heads.

Another great question to ask (And I can't speak for a turboprop like the Bear) but for jet airliners, not only pressurization but also air conditioning is provided from…the ambient air! Speaking for my aircraft, ambient air is drawn through the engines, most of it being used in the engines' combustion, but some is bled from the engines, cooled at the pre cooler, and supercooled by air conditioning packs, and routed through ducts in the aircraft into the cabin to provide pressurization and air conditioning. Since airliners are flying quite frequently through contrails left by other airliners, if there WERE poisonous chemtrails in the air, these airliners would be falling out of the sky due to the fact that not only the passengers would perish, the pilots would as well, since they all would be breathing to same toxic "chemtrails" ingested through the engines and distributed through the air conditioning ducts. You can couple that with the study shown on a previous thread concerning tests run on air conditioning ducts in airliners.
 
Last edited:
It very well could be fuel, when we refuel with our centerline drogue it is common to get fuel on the air refueling compartment's sighting window since the receiver's probe doesn't always get a good seat in the basket.
Makes sense KC but wouldn't the spray end up on the plane that's receiving the fuel due to the speed and direction the planes are moving.
 
Makes sense KC but wouldn't the spray end up on the plane that's receiving the fuel due to the speed and direction the planes are moving.

It does sometimes, I have had some slow leaks, and some that cover the window so badly that refueling must be discontinued. It looks like the windows in your home on a rainy day:) The slow leaks will just trickle down the window, and you will know either way because the smell of fuel fumes in the aircraft is quite noticeable.
 
Back
Top